Rashawn
Last seen for girls in 2001 at #15,352 · #3,240 for boys in 2025, 36 births
Given to boys 90.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1993 · 243 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,408since 1967
Rashawn over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,240 | 36 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,045 | 40 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,474 | 33 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,438 | 57 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,552 | 51 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,419 | 54 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,736 | 46 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,101 | 67 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,065 | 67 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,365 | 55 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,780 | 85 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,063 | 68 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,782 | 81 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,697 | 89 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,476 | 110 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,316 | 130 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,413 | 119 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,233 | 141 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,287 | 135 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,058 | 169 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,105 | 149 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,231 | 123 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,155 | 130 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,119 | 129 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #876 | 181 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #842 | 190 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #896 | 168 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #708 | 235 |
| 1997 | #5,626 | 17 | #767 | 194 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #769 | 191 |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 | #665 | 248 |
| 1994 | #4,376 | 23 | #718 | 213 |
| 1993 | #3,585 | 30 | #658 | 243 |
| 1992 | #3,419 | 32 | #687 | 226 |
| 1991 | #3,540 | 30 | #697 | 211 |
| 1990 | #3,714 | 28 | #722 | 199 |
| 1989 | #3,330 | 31 | #778 | 163 |
| 1988 | #3,039 | 33 | #769 | 150 |
| 1987 | #2,852 | 34 | #793 | 136 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #698 | 170 |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 | #839 | 114 |
| 1984 | #4,737 | 15 | #891 | 96 |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | #878 | 100 |
| 1982 | #4,167 | 18 | #871 | 104 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | #1,029 | 78 |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 | #927 | 92 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #858 | 102 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | #841 | 104 |
| 1977 | #2,909 | 27 | #853 | 101 |
| 1976 | #2,546 | 31 | #1,067 | 61 |
| 1975 | #3,637 | 18 | #1,238 | 47 |
| 1974 | #3,313 | 20 | #1,269 | 44 |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 | #1,871 | 23 |
| 1972 | #2,976 | 22 | #1,871 | 23 |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | #2,203 | 18 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rashawn! It came in at #3,231, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1968–1969, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Rashawn is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Ohio#552 · 1 in 4,296
- South Carolina#677 · 1 in 4,601
- Louisiana#691 · 1 in 4,191
- New Jersey#696 · 1 in 5,698
- North Carolina#755 · 1 in 6,190
Best ever in a state: #196 in New Jersey, 1977.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | #552 | 15 | 1 in 4,296 |
| South Carolina | #677 | 5 | 1 in 4,601 |
| Louisiana | #691 | 6 | 1 in 4,191 |
| New Jersey | #696 | 8 | 1 in 5,698 |
| North Carolina | #755 | 9 | 1 in 6,190 |
| Pennsylvania | #759 | 9 | 1 in 7,096 |
| New York | #844 | 15 | 1 in 7,274 |
| Florida | #932 | 12 | 1 in 8,376 |
| Michigan | #947 | 6 | 1 in 8,567 |
| Illinois | #999 | 8 | 1 in 9,344 |
| Georgia | #1,119 | 6 | 1 in 10,198 |
| California | #2,246 | 6 | 1 in 42,362 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rashawn
- 195 spots since 2024 (#3,045 → #3,240)
- 821 spots since 2020 (#2,419 → #3,240)
- 1,460 spots since 2015 (#1,780 → #3,240)
- Biggest jump: 214 spots in 1977 (#1,067 → #853)
- Biggest drop: 243 spots in 2002 (#876 → #1,119)
- Debuted 1967
- Peaked 1993 at #658 (243 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 1982–2001
- Highest: 1 in 7,676 boys born in 1995 were named Rashawn (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 47,447 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #658 in 1993, was only 1 in 8,071 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 33.2% of all boys named Rashawn (2,128) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1971, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12 | #3,231 (1967) | #3,818 |
| 1970s | 530 | #841 (1978) | #1,591 |
| 1980s | 1,203 | #698 (1986) | #847 |
| 1990s | 2,128 | #658 (1993) | #729 |
| 2000s | 1,466 | #842 (2000) | #1,132 |
| 2010s | 798 | #1,316 (2010) | #1,938 |
| 2020s | 271 | #2,419 (2020) | #2,861 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rashawn in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 14,469 of them was named Rashawn, which outranked 91.6% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,227Jeff142
- #1,227Lester142
- #1,227Lucca142
- #1,233Rashawn141
- #1,233Aarush141
- #1,233Fidel141
- #1,233Freddie141
- #1,240Baylor140
- #1,240Broden140
- #1,240Colter140
Tied with 6 names at #1,233; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.