Ray
#6,116 for girls in 2025, 19 births · #791 for boys in 2025, 319 births
Given to boys 97.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1891 · 360 births
- Debut · boys
- 142 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 69 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 204,701since 1880
Ray over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,116 | 19 | #791 | 319 |
| 2024 | #4,772 | 28 | #777 | 323 |
| 2023 | #4,999 | 26 | #763 | 338 |
| 2022 | #4,671 | 29 | #760 | 332 |
| 2021 | #4,833 | 27 | #840 | 283 |
| 2020 | #5,487 | 22 | #724 | 343 |
| 2019 | #6,698 | 17 | #735 | 328 |
| 2018 | #5,785 | 21 | #726 | 330 |
| 2017 | #5,821 | 21 | #767 | 306 |
| 2016 | #5,985 | 21 | #750 | 324 |
| 2015 | #10,148 | 10 | #712 | 349 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | #728 | 329 |
| 2013 | #9,612 | 11 | #665 | 363 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #719 | 327 |
| 2011 | — | #678 | 347 | |
| 2010 | — | #659 | 364 | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #669 | 366 |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #651 | 374 |
| 2007 | — | #633 | 384 | |
| 2006 | — | #556 | 451 | |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | #563 | 420 |
| 2004 | — | #577 | 391 | |
| 2003 | — | #617 | 336 | |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #578 | 377 |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #573 | 360 |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #516 | 435 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #513 | 414 |
| 1998 | — | #489 | 446 | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #483 | 443 |
| 1996 | — | #483 | 445 | |
| 1995 | — | #454 | 495 | |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 | #405 | 564 |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #412 | 562 |
| 1992 | #7,067 | 12 | #394 | 582 |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #349 | 695 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #328 | 755 |
| 1989 | #7,449 | 10 | #326 | 722 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #305 | 744 |
| 1987 | #5,074 | 15 | #283 | 769 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #284 | 738 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #271 | 768 |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #273 | 766 |
| 1983 | #5,148 | 13 | #272 | 764 |
| 1982 | #4,527 | 16 | #254 | 866 |
| 1981 | #6,323 | 10 | #255 | 855 |
| 1980 | #6,319 | 10 | #261 | 843 |
| 1979 | #4,052 | 18 | #258 | 824 |
| 1978 | #3,196 | 24 | #255 | 793 |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | #251 | 807 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | #238 | 850 |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 | #228 | 895 |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | #220 | 955 |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | #207 | 1,046 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | #197 | 1,178 |
| 1971 | #2,665 | 27 | #196 | 1,267 |
| 1970 | #2,705 | 26 | #186 | 1,462 |
| 1969 | #2,704 | 24 | #182 | 1,522 |
| 1968 | #2,538 | 24 | #170 | 1,593 |
| 1967 | #2,963 | 18 | #165 | 1,616 |
| 1966 | #2,249 | 28 | #155 | 1,825 |
| 1965 | #2,464 | 24 | #147 | 2,092 |
| 1964 | #2,600 | 23 | #142 | 2,280 |
| 1963 | #1,738 | 44 | #131 | 2,581 |
| 1962 | #2,031 | 33 | #132 | 2,675 |
| 1961 | #2,070 | 32 | #126 | 2,920 |
| 1960 | #2,013 | 32 | #121 | 3,079 |
| 1959 | #1,596 | 46 | #121 | 3,219 |
| 1958 | #1,512 | 50 | #121 | 3,188 |
| 1957 | #1,652 | 42 | #111 | 3,410 |
| 1956 | #1,453 | 53 | #113 | 3,230 |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 | #113 | 3,070 |
| 1954 | #1,540 | 43 | #118 | 2,976 |
| 1953 | #1,389 | 49 | #115 | 2,815 |
| 1952 | #1,540 | 39 | #113 | 2,690 |
| 1951 | #1,450 | 42 | #114 | 2,678 |
| 1950 | #1,653 | 32 | #110 | 2,636 |
| 1949 | #1,452 | 40 | #109 | 2,710 |
| 1948 | #1,327 | 48 | #100 | 3,134 |
| 1947 | #1,545 | 37 | #97 | 3,379 |
| 1946 | #1,239 | 48 | #95 | 3,169 |
| 1945 | #1,261 | 40 | #92 | 2,740 |
| 1944 | #1,153 | 46 | #86 | 2,904 |
| 1943 | #1,228 | 43 | #84 | 3,063 |
| 1942 | #1,137 | 48 | #84 | 3,067 |
| 1941 | #1,310 | 34 | #83 | 2,695 |
| 1940 | #1,046 | 47 | #77 | 2,795 |
| 1939 | #1,066 | 45 | #74 | 2,709 |
| 1938 | #1,079 | 44 | #72 | 2,881 |
| 1937 | #1,002 | 49 | #71 | 2,725 |
| 1936 | #847 | 64 | #64 | 2,939 |
| 1935 | #785 | 74 | #64 | 3,070 |
| 1934 | #815 | 68 | #63 | 3,177 |
| 1933 | #808 | 68 | #62 | 3,032 |
| 1932 | #801 | 72 | #59 | 3,263 |
| 1931 | #740 | 83 | #60 | 3,161 |
| 1930 | #679 | 102 | #57 | 3,254 |
| 1929 | #648 | 116 | #57 | 3,174 |
| 1928 | #724 | 95 | #57 | 3,248 |
| 1927 | #702 | 108 | #60 | 3,253 |
| 1926 | #660 | 120 | #57 | 3,409 |
| 1925 | #750 | 97 | #64 | 3,219 |
| 1924 | #673 | 122 | #60 | 3,369 |
| 1923 | #678 | 120 | #61 | 3,161 |
| 1922 | #742 | 96 | #65 | 3,051 |
| 1921 | #643 | 133 | #67 | 3,075 |
| 1920 | #605 | 138 | #67 | 3,086 |
| 1919 | #624 | 126 | #69 | 2,722 |
| 1918 | #556 | 162 | #69 | 2,763 |
| 1917 | #592 | 133 | #74 | 2,426 |
| 1916 | #584 | 132 | #73 | 2,334 |
| 1915 | #576 | 126 | #67 | 2,365 |
| 1914 | #536 | 108 | #74 | 1,657 |
| 1913 | #628 | 67 | #73 | 1,328 |
| 1912 | #639 | 60 | #77 | 1,050 |
| 1911 | #522 | 63 | #71 | 602 |
| 1910 | #543 | 56 | #67 | 545 |
| 1909 | #535 | 50 | #66 | 475 |
| 1908 | #567 | 43 | #67 | 446 |
| 1907 | #601 | 38 | #60 | 475 |
| 1906 | #515 | 44 | #60 | 421 |
| 1905 | #519 | 43 | #60 | 424 |
| 1904 | #629 | 30 | #55 | 432 |
| 1903 | #558 | 34 | #55 | 397 |
| 1902 | #502 | 40 | #57 | 391 |
| 1901 | #795 | 17 | #59 | 338 |
| 1900 | #589 | 35 | #55 | 457 |
| 1899 | #514 | 33 | #61 | 315 |
| 1898 | #581 | 31 | #56 | 394 |
| 1897 | #440 | 44 | #51 | 397 |
| 1896 | #499 | 35 | #50 | 426 |
| 1895 | #565 | 28 | #56 | 380 |
| 1894 | #442 | 40 | #57 | 379 |
| 1893 | #449 | 35 | #56 | 378 |
| 1892 | #434 | 38 | #57 | 385 |
| 1891 | #413 | 36 | #49 | 360 |
| 1890 | #378 | 44 | #56 | 349 |
| 1889 | #439 | 30 | #54 | 355 |
| 1888 | #458 | 29 | #63 | 331 |
| 1887 | #471 | 22 | #66 | 258 |
| 1886 | #476 | 21 | #67 | 271 |
| 1885 | #413 | 25 | #74 | 237 |
| 1884 | #425 | 22 | #77 | 232 |
| 1883 | #615 | 10 | #78 | 202 |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | #82 | 195 |
| 1881 | #503 | 11 | #86 | 148 |
| 1880 | #628 | 8 | #95 | 142 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ray was already there! It came in at #95, and was given to 142 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 210 boys a year got the name.
Where Ray is popular in 1931
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#19 · 1 in 101
- Idaho#25 · 1 in 111
- Kentucky#29 · 1 in 154
- West Virginia#31 · 1 in 149
- Montana#33 · 1 in 146
Best ever in a state: #12 in Idaho, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #19 | 47 | 1 in 101 |
| Idaho | #25 | 31 | 1 in 111 |
| Kentucky | #29 | 161 | 1 in 154 |
| West Virginia | #31 | 109 | 1 in 149 |
| Montana | #33 | 26 | 1 in 146 |
| North Carolina | #39 | 161 | 1 in 196 |
| Arkansas | #40 | 78 | 1 in 210 |
| Tennessee | #41 | 112 | 1 in 217 |
| Oklahoma | #43 | 112 | 1 in 193 |
| Wyoming | #44 | 10 | 1 in 156 |
| Alabama | #45 | 109 | 1 in 237 |
| Colorado | #45 | 46 | 1 in 184 |
| Washington | #46 | 49 | 1 in 189 |
| California | #47 | 161 | 1 in 226 |
| Ohio | #50 | 182 | 1 in 264 |
| Georgia | #51 | 95 | 1 in 287 |
| South Carolina | #51 | 65 | 1 in 253 |
| Arizona | #52 | 21 | 1 in 193 |
| Indiana | #52 | 91 | 1 in 262 |
| Virginia | #56 | 79 | 1 in 267 |
| Texas | #57 | 202 | 1 in 273 |
| Florida | #58 | 43 | 1 in 261 |
| Louisiana | #58 | 77 | 1 in 239 |
| Missouri | #59 | 98 | 1 in 277 |
| New Mexico | #62 | 20 | 1 in 227 |
| Pennsylvania | #63 | 201 | 1 in 380 |
| Kansas | #68 | 53 | 1 in 271 |
| Michigan | #71 | 115 | 1 in 339 |
| Nebraska | #73 | 40 | 1 in 284 |
| Illinois | #74 | 135 | 1 in 399 |
| Oregon | #75 | 17 | 1 in 318 |
| South Dakota | #78 | 19 | 1 in 293 |
| Iowa | #82 | 49 | 1 in 387 |
| North Dakota | #82 | 19 | 1 in 307 |
| Minnesota | #88 | 50 | 1 in 398 |
| Wisconsin | #93 | 50 | 1 in 471 |
| Mississippi | #95 | 39 | 1 in 465 |
| District of Columbia | #96 | 6 | 1 in 585 |
| Vermont | #96 | 5 | 1 in 504 |
| New Hampshire | #98 | 5 | 1 in 600 |
| Maryland | #99 | 18 | 1 in 646 |
| Maine | #115 | 11 | 1 in 573 |
| New York | #125 | 86 | 1 in 1,049 |
| New Jersey | #129 | 23 | 1 in 1,179 |
| Massachusetts | #145 | 16 | 1 in 1,859 |
| Connecticut | #161 | 6 | 1 in 1,781 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ray
- 14 spots since 2024 (#777 → #791)
- 67 spots since 2020 (#724 → #791)
- 79 spots since 2015 (#712 → #791)
- Biggest jump: 80 spots in 2022 (#840 → #760)
- Biggest drop: 116 spots in 2021 (#724 → #840)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1891 at #49 (360 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 69 yrs · run 1880–1948
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 281 boys born in 1896 were named Ray (0.36%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,354 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #49 in 1891, was only 1 in 281 (0.36%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 15.7% of all boys named Ray (32,045) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,371 | #54 (1889) | #74 |
| 1890s | 3,763 | #49 (1891) | #55 |
| 1900s | 4,256 | #55 (1900) | #59 |
| 1910s | 17,792 | #67 (1915) | #71 |
| 1920s | 32,045 | #57 (1926) | #62 |
| 1930s | 30,211 | #57 (1930) | #65 |
| 1940s | 29,656 | #77 (1940) | #91 |
| 1950s | 29,912 | #110 (1950) | #115 |
| 1960s | 22,183 | #121 (1960) | #147 |
| 1970s | 10,077 | #186 (1970) | #224 |
| 1980s | 7,835 | #254 (1982) | #278 |
| 1990s | 5,401 | #328 (1990) | #431 |
| 2000s | 3,894 | #516 (2000) | #593 |
| 2010s | 3,367 | #659 (2010) | #714 |
| 2020s | 1,938 | #724 (2020) | #776 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ray in 1931
Top girls' names in 1931
Top boys' names in 1931
More about 1931
girls
1,064,728 girls got a published name in 1931; 1 in 12,828 of them was named Ray, which outranked 85.1% of the 4,979 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,039,665 boys got a published name in 1931; 1 in 329 of them was named Ray, which outranked 98.6% of the 4,321 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.