Rayden
- Last seen for girls in 2024 at #11,122
- #832 for boys in 2025, 297 births
- Given to boys 94.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2015 · 383 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,570since 1991
Rayden over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #832 | 297 | |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #757 | 336 |
| 2023 | #8,486 | 12 | #752 | 346 |
| 2022 | #6,464 | 18 | #682 | 398 |
| 2021 | #6,967 | 16 | #699 | 379 |
| 2020 | #7,969 | 13 | #730 | 336 |
| 2019 | #6,698 | 17 | #728 | 334 |
| 2018 | #6,010 | 20 | #684 | 358 |
| 2017 | #4,695 | 29 | #682 | 367 |
| 2016 | #6,401 | 19 | #738 | 331 |
| 2015 | #4,725 | 29 | #670 | 383 |
| 2014 | #5,456 | 24 | #680 | 372 |
| 2013 | #6,729 | 18 | #749 | 304 |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #757 | 302 |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | #828 | 262 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | #928 | 217 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #1,004 | 196 |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | #1,002 | 195 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #1,246 | 141 |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | #1,417 | 110 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #1,442 | 102 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 | #1,671 | 77 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #1,561 | 81 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #1,620 | 74 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #2,386 | 41 |
| 2000 | — | #2,256 | 43 | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #2,608 | 33 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #2,394 | 36 |
| 1997 | — | #2,546 | 31 | |
| 1996 | — | #2,838 | 26 | |
| 1995 | — | #2,556 | 29 | |
| 1994 | — | #4,290 | 14 | |
| 1993 | — | #7,638 | 6 | |
| 1992 | — | #7,422 | 6 | |
| 1991 | — | #6,519 | 7 | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five boys were named Rayden! It came in at #6,519, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1991–1993, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Rayden is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #487 | 9 | 1 in 2,126 |
| Arizona | #559 | 12 | 1 in 2,727 |
| Michigan | #571 | 14 | 1 in 2,871 |
| Alabama | #573 | 8 | 1 in 2,690 |
| Minnesota | #586 | 8 | 1 in 3,062 |
| Wisconsin | #618 | 7 | 1 in 3,347 |
| Tennessee | #672 | 10 | 1 in 3,677 |
| New York | #692 | 21 | 1 in 4,020 |
| Oklahoma | #698 | 5 | 1 in 3,536 |
| Maryland | #702 | 6 | 1 in 3,816 |
| New Jersey | #766 | 8 | 1 in 4,971 |
| California | #776 | 33 | 1 in 5,317 |
| Massachusetts | #789 | 5 | 1 in 5,404 |
| Virginia | #798 | 8 | 1 in 4,657 |
| Florida | #809 | 18 | 1 in 5,307 |
| Texas | #809 | 33 | 1 in 5,305 |
| Georgia | #853 | 10 | 1 in 5,022 |
| Missouri | #869 | 5 | 1 in 5,562 |
| North Carolina | #873 | 9 | 1 in 5,719 |
| Indiana | #949 | 5 | 1 in 6,333 |
| Washington | #999 | 5 | 1 in 6,560 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,004 | 7 | 1 in 7,466 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rayden
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 102 spots since 2020 (#730 → #832)
- Biggest jump: 100 spots in 2011
- Biggest drop: 75 spots in 2025
Rise & fade · boys
24 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2015 at #670 (383 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 16 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 16 yrs · run 2010–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 4,387
- Highest: 1 in 4,387 boys born in 2022 were named Rayden (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,751 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #670 in 2015, was only 1 in 5,005 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 49.2% of all boys named Rayden (3,230) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 188 | #2,394 (1998) | #4,312 |
| 2000s | 1,060 | #1,002 (2008) | #1,561 |
| 2010s | 3,230 | #670 (2015) | #744 |
| 2020s | 2,092 | #682 (2022) | #742 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Rayden ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: