Raylee
#1,163 for girls in 2025, 199 births · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to girls 98.2% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 312 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,037since 1988
Raylee over time
Rank among girls' names. Raylee has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,163 | 199 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,250 | 186 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,217 | 195 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,120 | 219 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,072 | 234 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,089 | 224 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #1,087 | 230 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,021 | 254 | — | |
| 2017 | #877 | 312 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #1,026 | 258 | #10,744 | 6 |
| 2015 | #1,018 | 262 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #1,030 | 252 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,037 | 240 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #936 | 273 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #1,096 | 224 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #1,082 | 230 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,132 | 223 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #1,521 | 153 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #1,702 | 123 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #1,950 | 98 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #2,229 | 79 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,187 | 79 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,352 | 68 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,844 | 51 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,854 | 50 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #3,569 | 34 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,497 | 34 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,370 | 24 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 | — | |
| 1995 | #4,217 | 24 | — | |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Raylee! It came in at #11,798, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1988–1989, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Raylee is popular in 2003
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#566 · 1 in 2,773
- Texas#1,170 · 1 in 8,320
Best ever in a state: #176 in Oklahoma, 2017.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #566 | 6 | 1 in 2,773 |
| Texas | #1,170 | 19 | 1 in 8,320 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raylee
- 87 spots since 2024 (#1,250 → #1,163)
- 74 spots since 2020 (#1,089 → #1,163)
- 145 spots since 2015 (#1,018 → #1,163)
- Biggest jump: 160 spots in 2012 (#1,096 → #936)
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 2018 (#877 → #1,021)
- Debuted 1988
- Peaked 2017 at #877 (312 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · 2012–2017
- Highest: 1 in 5,534 girls born in 2017 were named Raylee (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,077 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 50.3% of all girls named Raylee (2,535) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | #11,798 (1988) | #11,798 |
| 1990s | 161 | #3,497 (1998) | #6,972 |
| 2000s | 1,079 | #1,132 (2009) | #2,026 |
| 2010s | 2,535 | #877 (2017) | #1,021 |
| 2020s | 1,257 | #1,072 (2021) | #1,152 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raylee in 2003
Top girls' names in 2003
More about 2003
girls
1,827,145 girls got a published name in 2003; 1 in 23,128 of them was named Raylee, which outranked 88.1% of the 18,439 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,167Torie80
- #2,167Viktoria80
- #2,167Yael80
- #2,187Raylee79
- #2,187Azul79
- #2,187Cami79
- #2,187Dymond79
- #2,203Alaysha78
- #2,203Alesha78
- #2,203Anayeli78
Tied with 15 names at #2,187; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.