Rayleigh
#1,443 for girls in 2025, 149 births · #5,608 for boys in 2025, 16 births
Given to girls 96.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 189 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,000since 1995
Rayleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Rayleigh has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,443 | 149 | #5,608 | 16 |
| 2024 | #1,441 | 153 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 2023 | #1,356 | 166 | #6,517 | 13 |
| 2022 | #1,288 | 184 | #5,445 | 17 |
| 2021 | #1,600 | 131 | #7,587 | 10 |
| 2020 | #1,264 | 177 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #1,247 | 187 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #1,233 | 189 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #1,263 | 187 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,456 | 158 | #12,185 | 5 |
| 2015 | #1,470 | 156 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,345 | 174 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,646 | 129 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,663 | 128 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,612 | 134 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,688 | 125 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,375 | 81 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,318 | 84 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,890 | 62 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,054 | 55 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,195 | 33 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,748 | 38 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,307 | 30 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,392 | 17 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,619 | 16 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #8,584 | 10 | — | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | — | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | — | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Rayleigh! It came in at #10,514, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1997, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Rayleigh is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#303 · 1 in 1,109
- Alabama#366 · 1 in 1,490
- Kentucky#385 · 1 in 1,660
- Indiana#675 · 1 in 3,366
- Louisiana#755 · 1 in 3,498
Best ever in a state: #242 in Mississippi, 2019.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #303 | 10 | 1 in 1,109 |
| Alabama | #366 | 13 | 1 in 1,490 |
| Kentucky | #385 | 11 | 1 in 1,660 |
| Indiana | #675 | 9 | 1 in 3,366 |
| Louisiana | #755 | 6 | 1 in 3,498 |
| Georgia | #788 | 12 | 1 in 4,004 |
| Tennessee | #844 | 7 | 1 in 4,434 |
| Ohio | #1,282 | 6 | 1 in 8,678 |
| Texas | #1,294 | 19 | 1 in 8,805 |
| Florida | #1,630 | 7 | 1 in 12,387 |
| California | #2,970 | 6 | 1 in 33,953 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rayleigh
- 2 spots since 2024 (#1,441 → #1,443)
- 179 spots since 2020 (#1,264 → #1,443)
- 27 spots since 2015 (#1,470 → #1,443)
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2018 at #1,233 (189 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 8,914 girls born in 2022 were named Rayleigh (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,787 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #1,233 in 2018, was only 1 in 9,000 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 52.2% of all girls named Rayleigh (1,567) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43 | #7,716 (1999) | #9,685 |
| 2000s | 430 | #2,318 (2008) | #4,306 |
| 2010s | 1,567 | #1,233 (2018) | #1,462 |
| 2020s | 960 | #1,264 (2020) | #1,399 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rayleigh in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
Top boys' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 11,215 of them was named Rayleigh, which outranked 92.3% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,446Lizeth159
- #1,446Marion159
- #1,446Nailah159
- #1,456Rayleigh158
- #1,456Dior158
- #1,456Harlie158
- #1,456Janie158
- #1,465Alanah157
- #1,465Carli157
- #1,465Dominique157
Tied with 8 names at #1,456; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,897,738 boys got a published name in 2016; 1 in 379,548 of them was named Rayleigh, which outranked 14.2% of the 14,207 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 2,022 names at #12,185; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.