Raynell
- Last seen for girls in 2023 at #13,462
- Last seen for boys in 2018 at #8,819
- Given to girls 62.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1948 · 18 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 716since 1925
Raynell over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | #8,819 | 8 | |
| 2017 | — | #10,775 | 6 | |
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | #8,781 | 8 | |
| 2013 | — | #8,118 | 9 | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | #7,009 | 11 | |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | #6,802 | 12 | |
| 2008 | — | #7,698 | 10 | |
| 2007 | — | #9,788 | 7 | |
| 2006 | — | #7,427 | 10 | |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | #6,138 | 12 | |
| 2003 | — | #6,715 | 10 | |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2001 | — | #10,556 | 5 | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #6,652 | 13 | #6,128 | 8 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #7,271 | 6 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #4,167 | 13 |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #3,705 | 13 |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,459 | 13 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | #3,805 | 11 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #3,459 | 12 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #4,532 | 16 | #3,030 | 14 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #3,256 | 13 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #3,357 | 12 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #4,069 | 17 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #3,223 | 10 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #3,344 | 9 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | #4,230 | 6 |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #3,733 | 12 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #3,379 | 15 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #3,336 | 15 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #3,305 | 7 |
| 1961 | #3,793 | 12 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #2,989 | 17 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | #3,619 | 6 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | #3,275 | 7 |
| 1957 | #3,489 | 12 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #2,622 | 19 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #3,967 | 9 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,714 | 9 | — | |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,329 | 18 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,061 | 12 | — | |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | — | |
| 1945 | #3,132 | 9 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | — | |
| 1943 | #4,196 | 6 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,738 | 7 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | #2,424 | 12 | — | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | — | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #2,424 | 12 | — | |
| 1933 | #3,406 | 7 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | #3,226 | 8 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 | — | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1925
The first year at least five girls were named Raynell! It came in at #4,028, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1926–1929, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Raynell is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Raynell in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Raynell
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
Rise & fade · girls
23 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1925
- Peaked 1948 at #2,329 (18 births)
- Births halved by 1951, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 87,019
- Highest: 1 in 87,019 girls born in 1934 were named Raynell (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,430 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #2,329 in 1948, was only 1 in 94,328 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 18.0% of all girls named Raynell (129) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2023
- Mostly boys until 2022, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 7 | #4,028 (1925) | #4,028 |
| 1930s | 49 | #2,424 (1934) | #3,227 |
| 1940s | 94 | #2,329 (1948) | #3,261 |
| 1950s | 114 | #2,622 (1956) | #3,520 |
| 1960s | 129 | #2,937 (1966) | #3,796 |
| 1970s | 96 | #4,069 (1977) | #5,508 |
| 1980s | 129 | #4,532 (1981) | #5,594 |
| 1990s | 76 | #6,652 (1992) | #10,657 |
| 2000s | 16 | #10,246 (2002) | #11,024 |
| 2010s | 0 | — | — |
| 2020s | 6 | #13,462 (2023) | #13,462 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Raynell ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: