Reed
- #7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births
- #417 for boys in 2025, 770 births
- Given to boys 97.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2014 · 1,096 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 36,056since 1881
Reed over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Reed has never cracked the top 300 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,491 | 14 | #417 | 770 |
| 2024 | #5,615 | 22 | #422 | 747 |
| 2023 | #5,248 | 24 | #430 | 725 |
| 2022 | #6,464 | 18 | #415 | 777 |
| 2021 | #4,833 | 27 | #415 | 740 |
| 2020 | #4,263 | 32 | #450 | 661 |
| 2019 | #4,773 | 28 | #402 | 777 |
| 2018 | #4,144 | 34 | #376 | 855 |
| 2017 | #6,044 | 20 | #379 | 862 |
| 2016 | #3,923 | 38 | #351 | 962 |
| 2015 | #3,989 | 37 | #330 | 1,045 |
| 2014 | #5,163 | 26 | #318 | 1,096 |
| 2013 | #5,317 | 25 | #322 | 1,032 |
| 2012 | #5,398 | 25 | #371 | 817 |
| 2011 | #4,244 | 34 | #367 | 809 |
| 2010 | #5,602 | 24 | #381 | 759 |
| 2009 | #6,091 | 22 | #419 | 687 |
| 2008 | #7,073 | 18 | #405 | 726 |
| 2007 | #8,098 | 15 | #450 | 617 |
| 2006 | #6,592 | 19 | #470 | 568 |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #472 | 530 |
| 2004 | #8,259 | 13 | #483 | 514 |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 | #508 | 478 |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 | #493 | 468 |
| 2001 | #5,174 | 22 | #472 | 501 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 | #449 | 529 |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | #423 | 558 |
| 1998 | #4,636 | 23 | #437 | 524 |
| 1997 | #3,815 | 29 | #445 | 504 |
| 1996 | #2,476 | 51 | #422 | 532 |
| 1995 | #3,780 | 28 | #414 | 550 |
| 1994 | #2,752 | 44 | #442 | 509 |
| 1993 | #3,585 | 30 | #481 | 437 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #528 | 367 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #615 | 276 |
| 1990 | — | #655 | 238 | |
| 1989 | — | #666 | 226 | |
| 1988 | — | #576 | 255 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #584 | 240 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #582 | 233 |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #578 | 230 |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | #592 | 204 |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #592 | 207 |
| 1982 | — | #586 | 217 | |
| 1981 | — | #610 | 196 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #620 | 198 |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #729 | 141 |
| 1978 | — | #603 | 191 | |
| 1977 | — | #706 | 145 | |
| 1976 | — | #697 | 141 | |
| 1975 | — | #730 | 129 | |
| 1974 | — | #668 | 147 | |
| 1973 | — | #683 | 136 | |
| 1972 | — | #724 | 121 | |
| 1971 | — | #727 | 129 | |
| 1970 | — | #619 | 172 | |
| 1969 | — | #641 | 154 | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #637 | 142 |
| 1967 | — | #615 | 148 | |
| 1966 | — | #601 | 153 | |
| 1965 | — | #610 | 157 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #581 | 185 |
| 1963 | — | #609 | 166 | |
| 1962 | — | #563 | 197 | |
| 1961 | — | #590 | 179 | |
| 1960 | — | #542 | 215 | |
| 1959 | — | #552 | 197 | |
| 1958 | — | #492 | 252 | |
| 1957 | — | #459 | 283 | |
| 1956 | — | #451 | 282 | |
| 1955 | — | #451 | 270 | |
| 1954 | — | #457 | 252 | |
| 1953 | — | #438 | 263 | |
| 1952 | — | #448 | 250 | |
| 1951 | — | #435 | 241 | |
| 1950 | — | #468 | 204 | |
| 1949 | — | #412 | 268 | |
| 1948 | — | #503 | 172 | |
| 1947 | — | #532 | 160 | |
| 1946 | — | #548 | 135 | |
| 1945 | — | #572 | 112 | |
| 1944 | — | #589 | 109 | |
| 1943 | — | #600 | 111 | |
| 1942 | — | #532 | 131 | |
| 1941 | — | #613 | 96 | |
| 1940 | — | #622 | 91 | |
| 1939 | — | #695 | 73 | |
| 1938 | — | #597 | 98 | |
| 1937 | — | #742 | 67 | |
| 1936 | — | #669 | 78 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #663 | 80 |
| 1934 | — | #642 | 87 | |
| 1933 | — | #624 | 86 | |
| 1932 | — | #632 | 89 | |
| 1931 | — | #565 | 108 | |
| 1930 | — | #584 | 105 | |
| 1929 | — | #557 | 112 | |
| 1928 | — | #558 | 120 | |
| 1927 | — | #592 | 109 | |
| 1926 | — | #506 | 144 | |
| 1925 | — | #588 | 114 | |
| 1924 | — | #613 | 108 | |
| 1923 | — | #572 | 119 | |
| 1922 | — | #537 | 136 | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #521 | 142 |
| 1920 | — | #551 | 123 | |
| 1919 | — | #587 | 104 | |
| 1918 | — | #541 | 123 | |
| 1917 | — | #509 | 127 | |
| 1916 | — | #574 | 100 | |
| 1915 | — | #562 | 101 | |
| 1914 | — | #622 | 66 | |
| 1913 | — | #523 | 67 | |
| 1912 | — | #635 | 43 | |
| 1911 | — | #562 | 29 | |
| 1910 | — | #512 | 30 | |
| 1909 | — | #679 | 16 | |
| 1908 | — | #613 | 18 | |
| 1907 | — | #591 | 18 | |
| 1906 | — | #523 | 19 | |
| 1905 | — | #507 | 20 | |
| 1904 | — | #538 | 17 | |
| 1903 | — | #451 | 21 | |
| 1902 | — | #460 | 21 | |
| 1901 | — | #637 | 11 | |
| 1900 | — | #680 | 14 | |
| 1899 | — | #714 | 9 | |
| 1898 | — | #452 | 20 | |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | — | #518 | 16 | |
| 1895 | — | #456 | 19 | |
| 1894 | — | #594 | 12 | |
| 1893 | — | #615 | 11 | |
| 1892 | — | #525 | 15 | |
| 1891 | — | #597 | 10 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | #549 | 12 | |
| 1888 | — | #505 | 15 | |
| 1887 | — | #921 | 5 | |
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | #836 | 6 | |
| 1884 | — | #663 | 9 | |
| 1883 | — | #720 | 7 | |
| 1882 | — | #652 | 9 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five boys were named Reed! It came in at #653, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1885–1887, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Reed is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Kentucky#144 · 1 in 540
- Delaware#168 · 1 in 491
- West Virginia#183 · 1 in 616
- South Dakota#192 · 1 in 549
- Oklahoma#220 · 1 in 842
Best ever in a state: #31 in Utah, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #144 | 38 | 1 in 540 |
| Delaware | #168 | 6 | 1 in 491 |
| West Virginia | #183 | 10 | 1 in 616 |
| South Dakota | #192 | 7 | 1 in 549 |
| Oklahoma | #220 | 21 | 1 in 842 |
| Montana | #227 | 5 | 1 in 753 |
| Idaho | #230 | 11 | 1 in 785 |
| Nebraska | #244 | 10 | 1 in 882 |
| Pennsylvania | #247 | 49 | 1 in 1,067 |
| Wisconsin | #262 | 22 | 1 in 1,065 |
| Louisiana | #278 | 18 | 1 in 1,063 |
| Arkansas | #284 | 12 | 1 in 1,049 |
| Iowa | #293 | 13 | 1 in 1,064 |
| Kansas | #297 | 12 | 1 in 1,171 |
| Maryland | #300 | 18 | 1 in 1,272 |
| Tennessee | #311 | 28 | 1 in 1,313 |
| Minnesota | #314 | 19 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Missouri | #318 | 21 | 1 in 1,324 |
| Indiana | #325 | 23 | 1 in 1,377 |
| Oregon | #326 | 12 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Utah | #327 | 14 | 1 in 1,405 |
| Ohio | #333 | 34 | 1 in 1,545 |
| Virginia | #351 | 23 | 1 in 1,620 |
| Georgia | #428 | 26 | 1 in 1,932 |
| Connecticut | #440 | 6 | 1 in 2,201 |
| Mississippi | #471 | 6 | 1 in 1,806 |
| New York | #481 | 34 | 1 in 2,483 |
| Alabama | #484 | 10 | 1 in 2,152 |
| Michigan | #487 | 17 | 1 in 2,364 |
| Illinois | #500 | 20 | 1 in 2,478 |
| South Carolina | #501 | 9 | 1 in 2,355 |
| Washington | #502 | 14 | 1 in 2,343 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 9 | 1 in 3,002 |
| North Carolina | #512 | 19 | 1 in 2,709 |
| New Jersey | #523 | 14 | 1 in 2,840 |
| Texas | #533 | 61 | 1 in 2,870 |
| Colorado | #571 | 9 | 1 in 2,983 |
| California | #683 | 40 | 1 in 4,387 |
| Florida | #704 | 22 | 1 in 4,342 |
| Arizona | #720 | 8 | 1 in 4,090 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Reed
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 33 spots since 2020 (#450 → #417)
- 87 spots since 2015 (#330 → #417)
- Biggest jump: 416 spots in 1888
- Biggest drop: 262 spots in 1899
Rise & fade · boys
133 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 2014 at #318 (1,096 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 145 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 145 yrs · run 1881–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,753
- Highest: 1 in 1,753 boys born in 2014 were named Reed (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,218 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 25.0% of all boys named Reed (9,014) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 76 | #505 (1888) | #718 |
| 1890s | 137 | #452 (1898) | #562 |
| 1900s | 175 | #451 (1903) | #568 |
| 1910s | 790 | #509 (1917) | #563 |
| 1920s | 1,227 | #506 (1926) | #560 |
| 1930s | 871 | #565 (1931) | #641 |
| 1940s | 1,385 | #412 (1949) | #552 |
| 1950s | 2,494 | #435 (1951) | #465 |
| 1960s | 1,696 | #542 (1960) | #599 |
| 1970s | 1,452 | #603 (1978) | #689 |
| 1980s | 2,206 | #576 (1988) | #599 |
| 1990s | 4,495 | #414 (1995) | #486 |
| 2000s | 5,618 | #405 (2008) | #462 |
| 2010s | 9,014 | #318 (2014) | #360 |
| 2020s | 4,420 | #415 (2022) | #425 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Reed ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: