Remi
#145 for girls in 2025, 2,023 births · #787 for boys in 2025, 323 births
Given to girls 84.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 2,392 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 22,881since 1963
Remi over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #145 | 2,023 | #787 | 323 |
| 2024 | #145 | 1,998 | #812 | 311 |
| 2023 | #127 | 2,180 | #817 | 300 |
| 2022 | #118 | 2,392 | #739 | 348 |
| 2021 | #122 | 2,298 | #719 | 360 |
| 2020 | #125 | 2,206 | #768 | 313 |
| 2019 | #153 | 1,861 | #913 | 241 |
| 2018 | #177 | 1,668 | #1,086 | 182 |
| 2017 | #249 | 1,278 | #1,052 | 190 |
| 2016 | #296 | 1,102 | #1,110 | 176 |
| 2015 | #502 | 635 | #1,703 | 91 |
| 2014 | #657 | 435 | #1,714 | 88 |
| 2013 | #837 | 315 | #2,044 | 66 |
| 2012 | #1,041 | 242 | #2,066 | 66 |
| 2011 | #1,090 | 225 | #1,968 | 70 |
| 2010 | #1,218 | 199 | #2,069 | 65 |
| 2009 | #1,450 | 160 | #2,035 | 68 |
| 2008 | #1,677 | 133 | #2,291 | 57 |
| 2007 | #1,770 | 121 | #2,533 | 49 |
| 2006 | #1,734 | 120 | #3,686 | 27 |
| 2005 | #2,088 | 89 | #2,752 | 39 |
| 2004 | #2,100 | 86 | #2,887 | 35 |
| 2003 | #2,048 | 87 | #3,443 | 26 |
| 2002 | #1,780 | 101 | #3,670 | 23 |
| 2001 | #2,075 | 80 | #2,429 | 40 |
| 2000 | #2,332 | 66 | #3,299 | 25 |
| 1999 | #1,707 | 96 | #3,834 | 19 |
| 1998 | #1,921 | 79 | #3,017 | 26 |
| 1997 | #1,828 | 81 | #2,823 | 27 |
| 1996 | #2,106 | 65 | #4,022 | 16 |
| 1995 | #2,788 | 43 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #2,797 | 43 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #3,108 | 37 | #2,943 | 23 |
| 1992 | #2,869 | 41 | #3,920 | 15 |
| 1991 | #3,036 | 37 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #4,230 | 23 | #3,166 | 19 |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 | #2,902 | 21 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #3,523 | 14 |
| 1987 | #5,074 | 15 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #4,130 | 10 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | #4,141 | 9 |
| 1982 | #5,209 | 13 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #3,030 | 14 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #4,403 | 8 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #3,614 | 10 |
| 1977 | #6,340 | 9 | #3,386 | 11 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #3,471 | 10 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #4,309 | 7 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #3,445 | 9 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #3,658 | 8 |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | #2,739 | 12 |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #2,861 | 10 |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 | #2,445 | 12 |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | — | #2,784 | 9 | |
| 1965 | — | #3,244 | 7 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #2,665 | 10 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1961 | — | #4,065 | 5 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,423 | 12 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #3,275 | 7 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #3,886 | 5 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,452 | 6 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,391 | 11 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,875 | 8 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,844 | 8 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,021 | 7 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #2,356 | 11 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,919 | 7 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | #3,560 | 5 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | #2,302 | 13 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #4,239 | 5 | |
| 1922 | — | #4,307 | 5 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #3,815 | 6 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #2,073 | 15 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Remi! It came in at #6,592, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963–1967, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Remi is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#39 · 1 in 209
- Montana#44 · 1 in 177
- Oklahoma#58 · 1 in 314
- South Dakota#66 · 1 in 220
- Iowa#71 · 1 in 329
Best ever in a state: #27 in North Dakota, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #39 | 77 | 1 in 209 |
| Montana | #44 | 14 | 1 in 177 |
| Oklahoma | #58 | 47 | 1 in 314 |
| South Dakota | #66 | 12 | 1 in 220 |
| Iowa | #71 | 35 | 1 in 329 |
| Washington | #72 | 75 | 1 in 388 |
| Louisiana | #75 | 52 | 1 in 356 |
| Idaho | #78 | 22 | 1 in 278 |
| Kentucky | #79 | 44 | 1 in 384 |
| North Dakota | #79 | 11 | 1 in 254 |
| Wyoming | #79 | 5 | 1 in 172 |
| Kansas | #81 | 32 | 1 in 358 |
| Oregon | #82 | 35 | 1 in 374 |
| Alaska | #84 | 8 | 1 in 239 |
| Alabama | #89 | 45 | 1 in 416 |
| Ohio | #90 | 107 | 1 in 448 |
| Delaware | #91 | 8 | 1 in 293 |
| Hawaii | #91 | 9 | 1 in 275 |
| Indiana | #93 | 60 | 1 in 467 |
| Missouri | #93 | 55 | 1 in 445 |
| Arizona | #95 | 58 | 1 in 477 |
| Nebraska | #96 | 18 | 1 in 395 |
| Mississippi | #99 | 24 | 1 in 423 |
| Colorado | #101 | 49 | 1 in 440 |
| Pennsylvania | #101 | 95 | 1 in 509 |
| Maine | #108 | 10 | 1 in 319 |
| North Carolina | #109 | 86 | 1 in 507 |
| Arkansas | #114 | 23 | 1 in 449 |
| West Virginia | #117 | 13 | 1 in 419 |
| Minnesota | #123 | 42 | 1 in 516 |
| Tennessee | #129 | 51 | 1 in 595 |
| Michigan | #134 | 61 | 1 in 621 |
| Wisconsin | #134 | 38 | 1 in 547 |
| California | #146 | 220 | 1 in 792 |
| South Carolina | #155 | 27 | 1 in 641 |
| Illinois | #161 | 64 | 1 in 762 |
| Virginia | #168 | 45 | 1 in 759 |
| Georgia | #173 | 57 | 1 in 780 |
| Florida | #175 | 96 | 1 in 838 |
| Texas | #175 | 171 | 1 in 894 |
| New Mexico | #201 | 8 | 1 in 644 |
| Maryland | #216 | 26 | 1 in 858 |
| New York | #220 | 77 | 1 in 1,034 |
| New Jersey | #221 | 35 | 1 in 995 |
| Massachusetts | #230 | 25 | 1 in 954 |
| Nevada | #260 | 10 | 1 in 975 |
| Connecticut | #264 | 11 | 1 in 1,023 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Remi
- Held #145 since 2024
- 20 spots since 2020 (#125 → #145)
- 357 spots since 2015 (#502 → #145)
- Biggest jump: 206 spots in 2016 (#502 → #296)
- Biggest drop: 18 spots in 2024 (#127 → #145)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2022 at #118 (2,392 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 2013–2025
- Highest: 1 in 686 girls born in 2022 were named Remi (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 794 girls born in 2025 (0.13%)
- 57.2% of all girls named Remi (13,097) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1989, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 54 | #2,205 (1968) | #5,485 |
| 1970s | 74 | #5,984 (1975) | #6,889 |
| 1980s | 108 | #5,049 (1989) | #6,005 |
| 1990s | 545 | #1,707 (1999) | #2,639 |
| 2000s | 1,043 | #1,450 (2009) | #1,905 |
| 2010s | 7,960 | #153 (2019) | #622 |
| 2020s | 13,097 | #118 (2022) | #130 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Remi in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 733 of them was named Remi, which outranked 99.3% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 5,515 of them was named Remi, which outranked 94.5% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #764Lance315
- #764Vicente315
- #767Louie314
- #768Remi313
- #768Ben313
- #768Lee313
- #771Valentin309
- #772Orlando307
- #773Benicio306
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.