Rhea

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1893 · 56 births
Debut · girls
7 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
19,737
since 1882

Rhea over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Rhea has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank18801900192019401960198020002020peak #360, 1893girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#639452—
2024#613487—
2023#527577—
2022#600500—
2021#614485—
2020#625464—
2019#703411—
2018#756360—
2017#860318—
2016#947289—
2015#994271—
2014#1,092233—
2013#1,111219—
2012#1,096225—
2011#1,189202—
2010#1,165208—
2009#1,174214—
2008#1,250201—
2007#1,147223—
2006#1,167208—
2005#1,305170—
2004#908266#11,3565
2003#1,126195—
2002#1,008217—
2001#1,170176—
2000#1,168172—
1999#1,304139—
1998#1,520111—
1997#1,327130—
1996#1,78083—
1995#1,439112—
1994#1,58396—
1993#1,258136—
1992#1,274134—
1991#1,453109—
1990#1,307124—
1989#1,250126—
1988#1,376103—
1987#1,195121—
1986#1,219113—
1985#1,109130—
1984#1,059132—
1983#1,005141—
1982#1,221109—
1981#1,025140—
1980#1,087129—
1979#1,184111—
1978#1,014134—
1977#1,079120—
1976#1,145102#4,9356
1975#1,119104#5,4645
1974#1,28483—
1973#1,23185—
1972#1,32576—
1971#1,22192—
1970#1,29383—
1969#1,16991—
1968#978113—
1967#1,10389—
1966#1,022102#3,5376
1965#1,05599—
1964#1,091100#3,6016
1963#970120—
1962#1,006114#3,6406
1961#1,014114—
1960#1,009113#3,3377
1959#904133—
1958#829150—
1957#865138#3,5526
1956#944114#2,9698
1955#849131#3,8865
1954#910112—
1953#826126#3,1437
1952#836120#2,8758
1951#840113#2,8448
1950#827111#2,5809
1949#779123#3,0197
1948#686146#3,3166
1947#751130#3,0967
1946#716127#2,6908
1945#81087#2,7437
1944#77198#2,4679
1943#736110#2,5639
1942#678121#2,7128
1941#674109—
1940#74186#2,6718
1939#674101—
1938#75684#1,97613
1937#624118#2,9057
1936#611116#3,5495
1935#660100—
1934#656104#3,2776
1933#637106—
1932#606117—
1931#602121#2,10113
1930#619125#2,60910
1929#582139#2,9808
1928#575151#2,27013
1927#643125#2,12115
1926#557162#2,30213
1925#565160#2,01216
1924#594155#2,22914
1923#633135#2,22414
1922#530177#2,34713
1921#529179#2,50212
1920#515184#2,05216
1919#510177#2,15214
1918#529174#3,3687
1917#490181#2,56210
1916#497169#2,7309
1915#469172#2,8298
1914#504123—
1913#468115—
1912#49792—
1911#43089—
1910#52860—
1909#46864—
1908#48855—
1907#45163—
1906#44758—
1905#48549—
1904#46949—
1903#50440#1,0096
1902#41655—
1901#38558—
1900#47551—
1899#37161—
1898#42054—
1897#39753—
1896#37756#1,1015
1895#44041—
1894#40448—
1893#36056—
1892#40144—
1891#52424—
1890#40639—
1889#43031—
1888#55820—
1887#60814—
1886#63313—
1885#65811—
1884#58313—
1883#6928—
1882#7407—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Rhea! It came in at #740, and was given to 7 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1883, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.

Where Rhea is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNHWashington: #478 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,061 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #659 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,068 girlsMNIllinois: #709 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,410 girlsILWisconsin: #791 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,052 girlsWIMichigan: #519 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,382 girlsMINew York: #758 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 3,730 girlsNYMassachusetts: #353 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,502 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedRIOregon: #298 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,088 girlsORNevada: #374 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,314 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedINOhio: #462 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,970 girlsOHPennsylvania: #515 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,334 girlsPANew Jersey: #618 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,958 girlsNJConnecticut: #459 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,917 girlsCTCalifornia: #516 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 2,527 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedUTColorado: #456 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,944 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedWVVirginia: #606 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,812 girlsVAMaryland: #840 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,997 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDEArizona: #632 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,822 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedARTennessee: #813 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,009 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #659 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,099 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #688 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,048 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #619 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,463 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedMSAlabama: #716 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,053 girlsALGeorgia: #611 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,659 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Rhea, so not publishedHITexas: #742 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 4,014 girlsTXFlorida: #768 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 4,132 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Oregon#298 · 1 in 1,088
  2. Massachusetts#353 · 1 in 1,502
  3. Nevada#374 · 1 in 1,314
  4. Colorado#456 · 1 in 1,944
  5. Connecticut#459 · 1 in 1,917

Best ever in a state: #75 in Wyoming, 1921.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Oregon#298121 in 1,088
Massachusetts#353161 in 1,502
Nevada#37471 in 1,314
Colorado#456121 in 1,944
Connecticut#45961 in 1,917
Ohio#462241 in 1,970
Washington#478141 in 2,061
Pennsylvania#515201 in 2,334
California#516641 in 2,527
Michigan#519151 in 2,382
Virginia#606121 in 2,812
Georgia#611171 in 2,659
New Jersey#618121 in 2,958
Oklahoma#61961 in 2,463
Arizona#632101 in 2,822
Minnesota#65971 in 3,068
North Carolina#659151 in 3,099
South Carolina#68861 in 3,048
Illinois#709131 in 3,410
Alabama#71661 in 3,053
Texas#742401 in 4,014
New York#758211 in 3,730
Florida#768211 in 4,132
Wisconsin#79151 in 4,052
Tennessee#81381 in 4,009
Maryland#84051 in 3,997
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Rhea
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 14 spots since 2020 (#625 → #639)
  • 355 spots since 2015 (#994 → #639)
  • Biggest jump: 218 spots in 2004
  • Biggest drop: 397 spots in 2005
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1893 at #360 (56 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 92 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1882–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,781
  • Highest: 1 in 2,781 girls born in 2023 were named Rhea (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 3,556 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
  • Its best rank, #360 in 1893, was only 1 in 3,802 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
  • 15.0% of all girls named Rhea (2,965) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s117#430 (1889)#613
1890s476#360 (1893)#410
1900s542#385 (1901)#459
1910s1,352#430 (1911)#492
1920s1,567#515 (1920)#572
1930s1,092#602 (1931)#645
1940s1,137#674 (1941)#734
1950s1,248#826 (1953)#863
1960s1,055#970 (1963)#1,042
1970s990#1,014 (1978)#1,190
1980s1,244#1,005 (1983)#1,155
1990s1,174#1,258 (1993)#1,425
2000s2,042#908 (2004)#1,142
2010s2,736#703 (2019)#991
2020s2,965#527 (2023)#603

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Rhea ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: