Riker

Peak · boys
2015 · 95 births
Debut · boys
6 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
1,258
since 1991

Riker over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Riker has never cracked the top 1,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank1990200020102020peak #1,657, 2015boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025#2,67648
2024#2,12070
2023#1,95479
2022#1,89283
2021#1,90380
2020#2,04669
2019#1,84981
2018#1,98174
2017#1,84480
2016#1,66395
2015#1,65795
2014#1,90776
2013#2,49249
2012#3,05937
2011#3,51030
2010#4,09924
2009#4,92219
2008#5,48716
2007#5,21017
2006#6,90411
2005#5,57814
2004#5,81313
2003#6,25811
2002—
2001#9,2436
2000#6,8399
1999#7,1398
1998—
1997#6,1009
1996#7,9716
1995#4,50813
1994#5,10911
1993#4,22714
1992#8,4355
1991#7,2716
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1991

The first year at least five boys were named Riker! It came in at #7,271, and was given to 6 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1998, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.

Where Riker is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedHITexas: #2,574 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 35,010 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Riker, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Texas#2,574 · 1 in 35,010

Best ever in a state: #560 in Utah, 2022.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Texas#2,57451 in 35,010
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Riker
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 630 spots since 2020 (#2,046 → #2,676)
Rise & fade · boys
24 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1991
  • Peaked 2015 at #1,657 (95 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 19,976
  • Highest: 1 in 19,976 boys born in 2016 were named Riker (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 35,585 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #1,657 in 2015, was only 1 in 20,176 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 51.0% of all boys named Riker (641) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1990s72#4,227 (1993)#6,345
2000s116#4,922 (2009)#6,250
2010s641#1,657 (2015)#2,406
2020s429#1,892 (2022)#2,099

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Riker ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: