Rileigh
- #5,099 for girls in 2025, 25 births
- Last seen for boys in 2012 at #10,770
- Given to girls 98.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2004 · 207 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,832since 1991
Rileigh over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Rileigh has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,099 | 25 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,454 | 31 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,295 | 33 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,674 | 64 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,779 | 59 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,651 | 65 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,302 | 79 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,236 | 84 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,667 | 128 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,711 | 123 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,684 | 125 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,273 | 186 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,425 | 160 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #1,204 | 199 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #1,165 | 208 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,146 | 221 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #1,165 | 220 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #1,257 | 196 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #1,299 | 180 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #1,173 | 196 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,102 | 207 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #1,105 | 199 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,197 | 170 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,368 | 139 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,542 | 116 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,636 | 102 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,721 | 92 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,138 | 65 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #3,093 | 38 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,585 | 30 | — | |
| 1994 | #4,845 | 20 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,100 | 25 | — | |
| 1992 | #7,512 | 11 | — | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five girls were named Rileigh! It came in at #13,147, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1991, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Rileigh is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Rileigh in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Rileigh
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 2,320 spots since 2020 (#2,779 → #5,099)
Rise & fade · girls
13 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2004 at #1,102 (207 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,313
- Highest: 1 in 8,313 girls born in 2009 were named Rileigh (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 64,291 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,102 in 2004, was only 1 in 8,871 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 48.1% of all girls named Rileigh (1,844) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 388 | #1,636 (1999) | #4,642 |
| 2000s | 1,844 | #1,102 (2004) | #1,235 |
| 2010s | 1,357 | #1,165 (2010) | #1,732 |
| 2020s | 243 | #2,674 (2021) | #3,962 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Rileigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: