Riley
#48 for girls in 2025, 4,441 births · #207 for boys in 2025, 1,666 births
Given to girls 57.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2016 · 7,159 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 24 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 141,960since 1923
Riley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #48 | 4,441 | #207 | 1,666 |
| 2024 | #42 | 4,657 | #229 | 1,573 |
| 2023 | #43 | 4,643 | #223 | 1,632 |
| 2022 | #39 | 4,914 | #225 | 1,600 |
| 2021 | #37 | 5,225 | #245 | 1,452 |
| 2020 | #33 | 5,339 | #257 | 1,368 |
| 2019 | #30 | 5,712 | #263 | 1,374 |
| 2018 | #28 | 6,010 | #250 | 1,470 |
| 2017 | #25 | 6,368 | #252 | 1,471 |
| 2016 | #22 | 7,159 | #224 | 1,728 |
| 2015 | #35 | 5,739 | #194 | 2,094 |
| 2014 | #47 | 4,800 | #174 | 2,448 |
| 2013 | #45 | 4,941 | #157 | 2,559 |
| 2012 | #47 | 4,833 | #133 | 2,890 |
| 2011 | #47 | 5,045 | #111 | 3,462 |
| 2010 | #40 | 5,543 | #105 | 3,649 |
| 2009 | #38 | 5,637 | #107 | 3,791 |
| 2008 | #39 | 5,774 | #106 | 4,132 |
| 2007 | #52 | 5,212 | #109 | 3,973 |
| 2006 | #56 | 5,056 | #101 | 4,396 |
| 2005 | #54 | 5,127 | #106 | 4,110 |
| 2004 | #58 | 4,982 | #106 | 4,110 |
| 2003 | #72 | 4,243 | #104 | 4,077 |
| 2002 | #77 | 3,906 | #99 | 3,959 |
| 2001 | #106 | 3,044 | #105 | 3,653 |
| 2000 | #131 | 2,552 | #109 | 3,421 |
| 1999 | #138 | 2,312 | #127 | 2,970 |
| 1998 | #166 | 1,877 | #128 | 3,013 |
| 1997 | #184 | 1,669 | #135 | 2,833 |
| 1996 | #246 | 1,150 | #146 | 2,393 |
| 1995 | #287 | 969 | #170 | 1,919 |
| 1994 | #349 | 756 | #194 | 1,588 |
| 1993 | #453 | 553 | #218 | 1,379 |
| 1992 | #555 | 424 | #266 | 1,067 |
| 1991 | #726 | 286 | #297 | 865 |
| 1990 | #822 | 238 | #311 | 814 |
| 1989 | #1,014 | 169 | #342 | 675 |
| 1988 | #1,210 | 124 | #378 | 529 |
| 1987 | #1,470 | 88 | #398 | 476 |
| 1986 | #1,327 | 99 | #431 | 403 |
| 1985 | #1,760 | 64 | #473 | 334 |
| 1984 | #3,613 | 22 | #547 | 252 |
| 1983 | #2,516 | 36 | #562 | 225 |
| 1982 | #2,645 | 35 | #611 | 198 |
| 1981 | #3,340 | 25 | #635 | 180 |
| 1980 | #4,148 | 18 | #678 | 164 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | #671 | 162 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #651 | 166 |
| 1977 | #5,888 | 10 | #793 | 116 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #809 | 106 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #808 | 106 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #867 | 85 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #839 | 90 |
| 1972 | — | #873 | 85 | |
| 1971 | — | #822 | 96 | |
| 1970 | — | #905 | 78 | |
| 1969 | — | #861 | 79 | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #765 | 94 |
| 1967 | — | #836 | 73 | |
| 1966 | — | #757 | 93 | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #859 | 73 |
| 1964 | — | #747 | 106 | |
| 1963 | — | #766 | 99 | |
| 1962 | — | #725 | 112 | |
| 1961 | — | #762 | 102 | |
| 1960 | — | #745 | 107 | |
| 1959 | — | #721 | 113 | |
| 1958 | — | #699 | 115 | |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #648 | 141 |
| 1956 | — | #655 | 134 | |
| 1955 | — | #648 | 130 | |
| 1954 | — | #573 | 166 | |
| 1953 | — | #551 | 164 | |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #546 | 163 |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | #566 | 146 |
| 1950 | — | #548 | 152 | |
| 1949 | — | #510 | 170 | |
| 1948 | — | #492 | 179 | |
| 1947 | #4,764 | 6 | #495 | 186 |
| 1946 | — | #501 | 166 | |
| 1945 | — | #507 | 139 | |
| 1944 | — | #467 | 171 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #473 | 171 |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | #492 | 157 |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | #446 | 174 |
| 1940 | — | #471 | 150 | |
| 1939 | — | #488 | 139 | |
| 1938 | — | #487 | 141 | |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | #481 | 139 |
| 1936 | — | #450 | 156 | |
| 1935 | — | #456 | 156 | |
| 1934 | — | #450 | 156 | |
| 1933 | — | #448 | 153 | |
| 1932 | — | #501 | 131 | |
| 1931 | — | #491 | 137 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #466 | 162 |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #461 | 163 |
| 1928 | — | #471 | 168 | |
| 1927 | — | #478 | 162 | |
| 1926 | — | #453 | 179 | |
| 1925 | — | #467 | 165 | |
| 1924 | — | #478 | 168 | |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | #465 | 174 |
| 1922 | — | #482 | 163 | |
| 1921 | — | #489 | 160 | |
| 1920 | — | #472 | 166 | |
| 1919 | — | #421 | 194 | |
| 1918 | — | #450 | 174 | |
| 1917 | — | #488 | 139 | |
| 1916 | — | #436 | 166 | |
| 1915 | — | #461 | 142 | |
| 1914 | — | #483 | 101 | |
| 1913 | — | #432 | 97 | |
| 1912 | — | #418 | 87 | |
| 1911 | — | #420 | 47 | |
| 1910 | — | #311 | 63 | |
| 1909 | — | #330 | 49 | |
| 1908 | — | #349 | 42 | |
| 1907 | — | #341 | 40 | |
| 1906 | — | #342 | 37 | |
| 1905 | — | #355 | 34 | |
| 1904 | — | #354 | 32 | |
| 1903 | — | #357 | 29 | |
| 1902 | — | #317 | 37 | |
| 1901 | — | #325 | 30 | |
| 1900 | — | #284 | 53 | |
| 1899 | — | #294 | 35 | |
| 1898 | — | #298 | 39 | |
| 1897 | — | #263 | 44 | |
| 1896 | — | #296 | 39 | |
| 1895 | — | #257 | 49 | |
| 1894 | — | #285 | 38 | |
| 1893 | — | #287 | 36 | |
| 1892 | — | #292 | 39 | |
| 1891 | — | #318 | 28 | |
| 1890 | — | #275 | 39 | |
| 1889 | — | #244 | 44 | |
| 1888 | — | #289 | 37 | |
| 1887 | — | #239 | 46 | |
| 1886 | — | #272 | 39 | |
| 1885 | — | #209 | 58 | |
| 1884 | — | #251 | 47 | |
| 1883 | — | #237 | 45 | |
| 1882 | — | #222 | 54 | |
| 1881 | — | #222 | 47 | |
| 1880 | — | #262 | 41 | |
First appearance
1923
The first year at least five girls were named Riley! It came in at #4,967, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1923–1928, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Riley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Pennsylvania#22 · 1 in 202
- Rhode Island#23 · 1 in 111
- Connecticut#24 · 1 in 158
- Kentucky#27 · 1 in 184
- Oregon#27 · 1 in 192
Best ever in a state: #6 in Hawaii, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #22 | 231 | 1 in 202 |
| Rhode Island | #23 | 22 | 1 in 111 |
| Connecticut | #24 | 73 | 1 in 158 |
| Kentucky | #27 | 94 | 1 in 184 |
| Louisiana | #27 | 75 | 1 in 218 |
| Oregon | #27 | 68 | 1 in 192 |
| New Hampshire | #29 | 29 | 1 in 131 |
| Virginia | #29 | 157 | 1 in 215 |
| Alabama | #31 | 79 | 1 in 232 |
| Delaware | #31 | 16 | 1 in 141 |
| Georgia | #31 | 173 | 1 in 261 |
| Colorado | #33 | 102 | 1 in 229 |
| District of Columbia | #34 | 15 | 1 in 135 |
| Tennessee | #35 | 130 | 1 in 247 |
| Hawaii | #36 | 13 | 1 in 165 |
| New Mexico | #37 | 24 | 1 in 195 |
| Ohio | #37 | 183 | 1 in 258 |
| Michigan | #40 | 139 | 1 in 257 |
| Massachusetts | #41 | 110 | 1 in 218 |
| Maryland | #44 | 73 | 1 in 274 |
| North Carolina | #44 | 173 | 1 in 269 |
| Mississippi | #45 | 35 | 1 in 254 |
| Missouri | #45 | 86 | 1 in 283 |
| South Carolina | #46 | 71 | 1 in 258 |
| Wisconsin | #46 | 80 | 1 in 253 |
| Arkansas | #47 | 42 | 1 in 252 |
| New Jersey | #48 | 144 | 1 in 247 |
| New York | #48 | 257 | 1 in 305 |
| Florida | #52 | 261 | 1 in 332 |
| Nevada | #53 | 33 | 1 in 279 |
| Washington | #53 | 95 | 1 in 304 |
| Kansas | #54 | 44 | 1 in 268 |
| West Virginia | #57 | 21 | 1 in 242 |
| Illinois | #58 | 132 | 1 in 336 |
| Minnesota | #58 | 73 | 1 in 294 |
| North Dakota | #58 | 13 | 1 in 208 |
| Alaska | #60 | 9 | 1 in 184 |
| Montana | #62 | 13 | 1 in 217 |
| Texas | #70 | 357 | 1 in 450 |
| California | #72 | 378 | 1 in 428 |
| Maine | #73 | 13 | 1 in 240 |
| Arizona | #74 | 76 | 1 in 371 |
| Idaho | #74 | 25 | 1 in 287 |
| Indiana | #83 | 71 | 1 in 393 |
| Oklahoma | #94 | 37 | 1 in 399 |
| Nebraska | #110 | 19 | 1 in 373 |
| Iowa | #111 | 28 | 1 in 420 |
| South Dakota | #139 | 8 | 1 in 381 |
| Utah | #139 | 32 | 1 in 534 |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Riley
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 6 spots since 2024 (#42 → #48)
- 15 spots since 2020 (#33 → #48)
- 13 spots since 2015 (#35 → #48)
- Biggest jump: 192 spots in 1990 (#1,014 → #822)
- Biggest drop: 7 spots in 2011 (#40 → #47)
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1923
- Peaked 2016 at #22 (7,159 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 24 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 24 yrs · run 2002–2025
- Top 1,000: 36 yrs · run 1990–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 248
- Highest: 1 in 248 girls born in 2016 were named Riley (0.40%)
- Latest: 1 in 362 girls born in 2025 (0.28%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 39.6% of all girls named Riley (56,150) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2003
- Mostly boys until 2002, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 11 | #4,053 (1929) | #4,510 |
| 1930s | 11 | #3,800 (1937) | #4,175 |
| 1940s | 21 | #4,420 (1941) | #4,624 |
| 1950s | 18 | #4,483 (1952) | #5,091 |
| 1960s | 11 | #5,817 (1965) | #6,417 |
| 1970s | 72 | #4,420 (1979) | #5,803 |
| 1980s | 680 | #1,014 (1989) | #2,304 |
| 1990s | 10,234 | #138 (1999) | #393 |
| 2000s | 45,533 | #38 (2009) | #68 |
| 2010s | 56,150 | #22 (2016) | #37 |
| 2020s | 29,219 | #33 (2020) | #40 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Riley in 2025
girls
#48
4,441 births · 1 in 362 girls
boys
#207
1,666 births · 1 in 1,025 boys
Top girls' names in 2025
Top boys' names in 2025
More about 2025
girls
1,607,267 girls got a published name in 2025; 1 in 362 of them was named Riley, which outranked 99.7% of the 17,297 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880).
Ranked beside Riley
Biggest movers since 2024
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,708,076 boys got a published name in 2025; 1 in 1,025 of them was named Riley, which outranked 98.5% of the 13,930 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880).