Rip

Peak · boys
2021 · 111 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
688
since 1938

Rip over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Rip has never cracked the top 1,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank19401960198020002020peak #1,565, 2021boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025#2,33259
2024#2,09871
2023#1,99976
2022#1,695101
2021#1,565111
2020#2,41954
2019#5,55516
2018—
2017#8,8408
2016—
2015—
2014—
2013—
2012—
2011—
2010—
2009—
2008—
2007—
2006—
2005#11,4725
2004—
2003—
2002—
2001—
2000—
1999—
1998—
1997—
1996#6,4968
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981#5,4686
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973#3,4459
1972#4,9865
1971#4,9075
1970#3,8367
1969#3,5957
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965#3,5376
1964—
1963#2,67310
1962#2,50411
1961#3,0978
1960#2,68510
1959#2,29513
1958#2,09315
1957#2,27413
1956#3,9425
1955#2,7649
1954#3,8275
1953#3,7985
1952—
1951#2,6629
1950#2,7708
1949#2,8028
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938#3,5345
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1938

The first year at least five boys were named Rip! It came in at #3,534, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1938–1948, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Rip is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Rip, so not publishedTXFlorida: #1,625 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 15,922 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Florida#1,625 · 1 in 15,922

Best ever in a state: #543 in Arkansas, 2021.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Florida#1,62561 in 15,922
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Rip
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 234 spots since 2024 (#2,098 → #2,332)
  • 87 spots since 2020 (#2,419 → #2,332)
Rise & fade · boys
83 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1938
  • Peaked 2021 at #1,565 (111 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 15,761
  • Highest: 1 in 15,761 boys born in 2021 were named Rip (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 28,950 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
  • 68.6% of all boys named Rip (472) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1930s5#3,534 (1938)#3,534
1940s8#2,802 (1949)#2,802
1950s82#2,093 (1958)#2,936
1960s52#2,504 (1962)#3,015
1970s26#3,445 (1973)#4,294
1980s6#5,468 (1981)#5,468
1990s8#6,496 (1996)#6,496
2000s5#11,472 (2005)#11,472
2010s24#5,555 (2019)#7,198
2020s472#1,565 (2021)#2,018

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Rip ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: