Robert
- #14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births
- #92 for boys in 2025, 3,772 births
- #1 for boys 16 years in a row, 1924–1939 (17 years in all)
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1953 · 86,243 births
- Debut · boys
- 2,415 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 146 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,849,730since 1880
Robert over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | #92 | 3,772 |
| 2024 | — | #90 | 3,806 | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | #88 | 3,827 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #84 | 4,082 |
| 2021 | — | #79 | 4,436 | |
| 2020 | — | #80 | 4,402 | |
| 2019 | #13,799 | 6 | #76 | 4,853 |
| 2018 | — | #71 | 5,191 | |
| 2017 | — | #65 | 5,566 | |
| 2016 | — | #62 | 6,010 | |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #63 | 6,137 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | #60 | 6,660 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | #62 | 6,721 |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #60 | 6,963 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #62 | 6,984 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | #54 | 7,569 |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 | #55 | 7,842 |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | #49 | 8,841 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 | #47 | 9,388 |
| 2006 | #9,901 | 11 | #47 | 9,911 |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 | #37 | 10,166 |
| 2004 | #3,989 | 35 | #36 | 10,684 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | #35 | 11,399 |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | #34 | 12,031 |
| 2001 | #5,364 | 21 | #30 | 12,665 |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 | #29 | 13,739 |
| 1999 | #4,576 | 24 | #26 | 14,540 |
| 1998 | #4,023 | 28 | #23 | 15,527 |
| 1997 | #3,224 | 36 | #23 | 16,304 |
| 1996 | #3,149 | 37 | #23 | 17,676 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 | #22 | 18,586 |
| 1994 | #2,432 | 52 | #21 | 20,560 |
| 1993 | #1,985 | 70 | #17 | 22,447 |
| 1992 | #2,220 | 60 | #17 | 24,094 |
| 1991 | #1,832 | 77 | #13 | 26,839 |
| 1990 | #1,439 | 109 | #13 | 28,886 |
| 1989 | #1,250 | 126 | #10 | 30,072 |
| 1988 | #930 | 182 | #10 | 30,319 |
| 1987 | #798 | 219 | #10 | 30,237 |
| 1986 | #738 | 241 | #9 | 31,350 |
| 1985 | #723 | 238 | #8 | 32,094 |
| 1984 | #718 | 230 | #9 | 31,768 |
| 1983 | #671 | 255 | #10 | 32,745 |
| 1982 | #731 | 233 | #9 | 34,409 |
| 1981 | #722 | 228 | #9 | 34,395 |
| 1980 | #682 | 254 | #9 | 34,266 |
| 1979 | #680 | 252 | #8 | 34,015 |
| 1978 | #642 | 254 | #8 | 33,374 |
| 1977 | #664 | 238 | #6 | 34,214 |
| 1976 | #654 | 236 | #7 | 33,789 |
| 1975 | #635 | 245 | #6 | 35,306 |
| 1974 | #635 | 241 | #7 | 37,005 |
| 1973 | #618 | 249 | #7 | 38,698 |
| 1972 | #573 | 288 | #6 | 43,013 |
| 1971 | #585 | 298 | #5 | 50,634 |
| 1970 | #560 | 327 | #5 | 57,177 |
| 1969 | #538 | 335 | #5 | 58,300 |
| 1968 | #589 | 265 | #5 | 58,174 |
| 1967 | #598 | 254 | #5 | 56,369 |
| 1966 | #595 | 251 | #5 | 59,317 |
| 1965 | #606 | 255 | #5 | 63,106 |
| 1964 | #594 | 279 | #5 | 69,980 |
| 1963 | #633 | 255 | #5 | 70,007 |
| 1962 | #680 | 229 | #5 | 70,199 |
| 1961 | #592 | 289 | #5 | 72,977 |
| 1960 | #610 | 268 | #5 | 72,357 |
| 1959 | #653 | 235 | #5 | 74,542 |
| 1958 | #639 | 237 | #4 | 77,338 |
| 1957 | #611 | 255 | #4 | 81,765 |
| 1956 | #655 | 214 | #3 | 83,924 |
| 1955 | #607 | 232 | #4 | 83,758 |
| 1954 | #671 | 192 | #2 | 86,331 |
| 1953 | #586 | 228 | #1 | 86,243 |
| 1952 | #639 | 193 | #2 | 86,588 |
| 1951 | #595 | 210 | #2 | 86,353 |
| 1950 | #594 | 203 | #2 | 83,553 |
| 1949 | #584 | 202 | #2 | 83,873 |
| 1948 | #581 | 209 | #2 | 85,478 |
| 1947 | #549 | 237 | #2 | 91,655 |
| 1946 | #540 | 214 | #2 | 84,136 |
| 1945 | #515 | 198 | #2 | 69,947 |
| 1944 | #518 | 194 | #2 | 70,855 |
| 1943 | #468 | 250 | #2 | 74,892 |
| 1942 | #514 | 208 | #2 | 71,845 |
| 1941 | #498 | 196 | #2 | 64,247 |
| 1940 | #465 | 206 | #2 | 61,198 |
| 1939 | #465 | 208 | #1 | 59,666 |
| 1938 | #454 | 219 | #1 | 62,271 |
| 1937 | #441 | 223 | #1 | 61,842 |
| 1936 | #433 | 221 | #1 | 58,500 |
| 1935 | #426 | 231 | #1 | 56,527 |
| 1934 | #398 | 266 | #1 | 55,843 |
| 1933 | #391 | 273 | #1 | 54,221 |
| 1932 | #352 | 326 | #1 | 59,268 |
| 1931 | #345 | 343 | #1 | 60,519 |
| 1930 | #320 | 426 | #1 | 62,153 |
| 1929 | #314 | 441 | #1 | 59,807 |
| 1928 | #315 | 434 | #1 | 60,701 |
| 1927 | #332 | 411 | #1 | 61,674 |
| 1926 | #347 | 369 | #1 | 61,130 |
| 1925 | #364 | 350 | #1 | 60,895 |
| 1924 | #398 | 299 | #1 | 60,802 |
| 1923 | #424 | 250 | #2 | 56,111 |
| 1922 | #436 | 237 | #2 | 53,796 |
| 1921 | #437 | 244 | #2 | 52,779 |
| 1920 | #474 | 205 | #3 | 48,679 |
| 1919 | #494 | 184 | #4 | 41,025 |
| 1918 | #516 | 178 | #4 | 40,619 |
| 1917 | #512 | 168 | #4 | 35,220 |
| 1916 | #612 | 122 | #4 | 31,741 |
| 1915 | #607 | 116 | #4 | 28,737 |
| 1914 | #647 | 80 | #4 | 21,188 |
| 1913 | #612 | 72 | #4 | 15,684 |
| 1912 | #615 | 64 | #4 | 12,836 |
| 1911 | #698 | 39 | #5 | 6,526 |
| 1910 | #794 | 29 | #4 | 5,609 |
| 1909 | #813 | 25 | #5 | 4,563 |
| 1908 | #755 | 26 | #5 | 4,219 |
| 1907 | #790 | 22 | #5 | 4,020 |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | #5 | 3,635 |
| 1905 | #797 | 21 | #6 | 3,410 |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | #5 | 3,414 |
| 1903 | #969 | 13 | #7 | 3,044 |
| 1902 | #756 | 21 | #6 | 3,180 |
| 1901 | #829 | 16 | #7 | 2,543 |
| 1900 | #742 | 24 | #6 | 3,821 |
| 1899 | #756 | 18 | #7 | 2,609 |
| 1898 | #1,009 | 12 | #7 | 2,932 |
| 1897 | #735 | 18 | #8 | 2,701 |
| 1896 | #576 | 28 | #8 | 2,719 |
| 1895 | #703 | 20 | #8 | 2,635 |
| 1894 | #643 | 21 | #8 | 2,497 |
| 1893 | #713 | 17 | #8 | 2,563 |
| 1892 | #706 | 17 | #8 | 2,710 |
| 1891 | #943 | 9 | #8 | 2,240 |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | #8 | 2,541 |
| 1889 | #687 | 14 | #9 | 2,513 |
| 1888 | #572 | 19 | #8 | 2,814 |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | #10 | 2,125 |
| 1886 | #556 | 16 | #8 | 2,443 |
| 1885 | #658 | 11 | #9 | 2,322 |
| 1884 | #851 | 7 | #10 | 2,468 |
| 1883 | #579 | 11 | #9 | 2,334 |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | #10 | 2,500 |
| 1881 | #582 | 9 | #11 | 2,140 |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | #10 | 2,415 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Robert was already there! It came in at #10, and was given to 2,415 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1899, when fewer than 3,000 boys a year got the name.
Where Robert is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Vermont#37 · 1 in 121
- Alabama#42 · 1 in 242
- District of Columbia#43 · 1 in 158
- New Hampshire#43 · 1 in 161
- South Carolina#45 · 1 in 241
Best ever in a state: #1 in Oregon, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #37 | 10 | 1 in 121 |
| Alabama | #42 | 89 | 1 in 242 |
| District of Columbia | #43 | 16 | 1 in 158 |
| New Hampshire | #43 | 28 | 1 in 161 |
| South Carolina | #45 | 88 | 1 in 241 |
| Massachusetts | #54 | 107 | 1 in 253 |
| Mississippi | #55 | 39 | 1 in 278 |
| Hawaii | #56 | 14 | 1 in 208 |
| Wyoming | #64 | 7 | 1 in 156 |
| Georgia | #68 | 151 | 1 in 333 |
| Virginia | #69 | 122 | 1 in 305 |
| Connecticut | #73 | 49 | 1 in 270 |
| New Jersey | #74 | 121 | 1 in 329 |
| New Mexico | #74 | 23 | 1 in 283 |
| Pennsylvania | #75 | 158 | 1 in 331 |
| Rhode Island | #77 | 13 | 1 in 240 |
| Missouri | #80 | 77 | 1 in 361 |
| Tennessee | #82 | 103 | 1 in 357 |
| Arkansas | #83 | 37 | 1 in 340 |
| Alaska | #85 | 9 | 1 in 252 |
| New York | #85 | 213 | 1 in 396 |
| South Dakota | #85 | 14 | 1 in 275 |
| Maryland | #86 | 62 | 1 in 369 |
| Ohio | #87 | 138 | 1 in 381 |
| North Carolina | #88 | 134 | 1 in 384 |
| Indiana | #90 | 85 | 1 in 373 |
| Nebraska | #90 | 27 | 1 in 327 |
| Oregon | #91 | 41 | 1 in 367 |
| Colorado | #92 | 74 | 1 in 363 |
| Kansas | #92 | 39 | 1 in 360 |
| Illinois | #99 | 116 | 1 in 427 |
| Michigan | #100 | 92 | 1 in 437 |
| Delaware | #101 | 10 | 1 in 295 |
| Florida | #101 | 224 | 1 in 426 |
| Maine | #101 | 13 | 1 in 296 |
| West Virginia | #101 | 19 | 1 in 324 |
| Kentucky | #102 | 53 | 1 in 387 |
| Louisiana | #106 | 47 | 1 in 407 |
| Montana | #109 | 11 | 1 in 342 |
| Texas | #109 | 365 | 1 in 480 |
| Wisconsin | #109 | 55 | 1 in 426 |
| Minnesota | #110 | 58 | 1 in 422 |
| California | #113 | 350 | 1 in 501 |
| Iowa | #113 | 34 | 1 in 407 |
| Arizona | #132 | 66 | 1 in 496 |
| Oklahoma | #133 | 35 | 1 in 505 |
| Washington | #136 | 59 | 1 in 556 |
| Utah | #151 | 35 | 1 in 562 |
| Nevada | #155 | 20 | 1 in 565 |
| Idaho | #166 | 16 | 1 in 539 |
| North Dakota | #191 | 6 | 1 in 559 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Robert
- 12 spots since 2020 (#80 → #92)
- Biggest jump: 2 spots in 1888
- Biggest drop: 10 spots in 2006
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1953 at #1 (86,243 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 19 yrs later
- #1: 17 yrs · run 1924–1939
- Top 10: 109 yrs · run 1882–1989
- Top 100: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 17 boys born in 1931 were named Robert (5.8%)
- Latest: 1 in 453 boys born in 2025 (0.22%)
- Its best rank, #1 in 1953, was only 1 in 23 (4.4%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 17.1% of all boys named Robert (830,395) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24,074 | #8 (1888) | #9 |
| 1890s | 26,147 | #7 (1898) | #8 |
| 1900s | 35,849 | #5 (1909) | #6 |
| 1910s | 239,185 | #4 (1919) | #4 |
| 1920s | 576,374 | #1 (1927) | #2 |
| 1930s | 590,810 | #1 (1938) | #1 |
| 1940s | 758,126 | #2 (1947) | #2 |
| 1950s | 830,395 | #1 (1953) | #3 |
| 1960s | 650,786 | #5 (1961) | #5 |
| 1970s | 397,225 | #5 (1970) | #7 |
| 1980s | 321,655 | #8 (1985) | #9 |
| 1990s | 205,459 | #13 (1990) | #20 |
| 2000s | 106,666 | #29 (2000) | #40 |
| 2010s | 62,654 | #54 (2010) | #64 |
| 2020s | 24,325 | #79 (2021) | #86 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Robert ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: