Rocio
#3,342 for girls in 2025, 46 births · Last seen for boys in 2000 at #8,209
Given to girls 96.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1991 · 446 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,336since 1952
Rocio over time
Rank among girls' names. Rocio has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,342 | 46 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,661 | 65 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,466 | 72 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,689 | 64 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,186 | 85 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,549 | 67 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,305 | 78 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,508 | 70 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,487 | 72 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,463 | 74 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,937 | 104 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,027 | 97 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,834 | 110 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,500 | 149 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,671 | 126 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,474 | 153 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,121 | 225 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,271 | 196 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,180 | 215 | — | |
| 2006 | #952 | 274 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,004 | 243 | — | |
| 2004 | #861 | 285 | — | |
| 2003 | #886 | 272 | — | |
| 2002 | #804 | 291 | — | |
| 2001 | #949 | 233 | — | |
| 2000 | #774 | 295 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #748 | 300 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #673 | 343 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #673 | 323 | #4,960 | 12 |
| 1996 | #673 | 327 | #5,187 | 11 |
| 1995 | #615 | 360 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #551 | 439 | #2,766 | 26 |
| 1993 | #550 | 432 | #3,368 | 19 |
| 1992 | #528 | 450 | #2,999 | 22 |
| 1991 | #521 | 446 | #2,143 | 34 |
| 1990 | #547 | 432 | #3,779 | 15 |
| 1989 | #573 | 382 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #583 | 350 | #2,509 | 23 |
| 1987 | #596 | 328 | #3,201 | 15 |
| 1986 | #579 | 334 | #2,096 | 27 |
| 1985 | #566 | 348 | #2,293 | 23 |
| 1984 | #568 | 324 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #537 | 349 | #2,676 | 17 |
| 1982 | #614 | 293 | #3,282 | 13 |
| 1981 | #593 | 310 | #3,601 | 11 |
| 1980 | #570 | 325 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #651 | 268 | #4,842 | 7 |
| 1978 | #655 | 245 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #736 | 210 | #3,836 | 9 |
| 1976 | #709 | 206 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #778 | 181 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #785 | 174 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #894 | 140 | #4,505 | 6 |
| 1972 | #893 | 141 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,066 | 113 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #1,191 | 96 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,625 | 50 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,537 | 53 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,859 | 38 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,993 | 34 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,836 | 41 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,424 | 25 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,104 | 15 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 | — | |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | — | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Rocio! It came in at #3,796, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1953–1954, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Rocio is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#364 · 1 in 1,371
- Utah#533 · 1 in 2,628
- California#572 · 1 in 3,245
- Texas#649 · 1 in 3,650
- Washington#751 · 1 in 4,194
Best ever in a state: #179 in California, 1980.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #364 | 5 | 1 in 1,371 |
| Utah | #533 | 7 | 1 in 2,628 |
| California | #572 | 71 | 1 in 3,245 |
| Texas | #649 | 44 | 1 in 3,650 |
| Washington | #751 | 7 | 1 in 4,194 |
| North Carolina | #858 | 9 | 1 in 5,044 |
| Illinois | #894 | 12 | 1 in 5,597 |
| Arizona | #895 | 7 | 1 in 5,075 |
| Indiana | #946 | 5 | 1 in 6,501 |
| Florida | #1,101 | 11 | 1 in 7,792 |
| New York | #1,283 | 10 | 1 in 9,508 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rocio
- 681 spots since 2024 (#2,661 → #3,342)
- 793 spots since 2020 (#2,549 → #3,342)
- 1,405 spots since 2015 (#1,937 → #3,342)
- Biggest jump: 173 spots in 1972 (#1,066 → #893)
- Biggest drop: 228 spots in 2007 (#952 → #1,180)
- Debuted 1952
- Peaked 1991 at #521 (446 births)
- Births halved by 2007, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1972–2004
- Highest: 1 in 4,068 girls born in 1994 were named Rocio (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 34,941 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #521 in 1991, was only 1 in 4,204 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 28.9% of all girls named Rocio (3,852) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 59 | #3,104 (1959) | #4,494 |
| 1960s | 347 | #1,537 (1967) | #2,231 |
| 1970s | 1,774 | #651 (1979) | #836 |
| 1980s | 3,343 | #537 (1983) | #578 |
| 1990s | 3,852 | #521 (1991) | #608 |
| 2000s | 2,529 | #774 (2000) | #980 |
| 2010s | 1,033 | #1,474 (2010) | #2,021 |
| 2020s | 399 | #2,186 (2021) | #2,649 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rocio in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 7,604 of them was named Rocio, which outranked 94.8% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).