Rodney
Last seen for girls in 2000 at #9,874 · #1,091 for boys in 2025, 197 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1965 · 11,086 births
- Debut · boys
- 13 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 32 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 247,150since 1880
Rodney over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,091 | 197 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,076 | 202 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,144 | 183 | |
| 2022 | — | #990 | 228 | |
| 2021 | — | #957 | 234 | |
| 2020 | — | #863 | 262 | |
| 2019 | — | #853 | 262 | |
| 2018 | — | #820 | 273 | |
| 2017 | — | #777 | 301 | |
| 2016 | — | #717 | 341 | |
| 2015 | — | #714 | 347 | |
| 2014 | — | #696 | 357 | |
| 2013 | — | #627 | 392 | |
| 2012 | — | #593 | 430 | |
| 2011 | — | #553 | 461 | |
| 2010 | — | #549 | 460 | |
| 2009 | — | #492 | 554 | |
| 2008 | — | #503 | 545 | |
| 2007 | — | #438 | 639 | |
| 2006 | — | #447 | 606 | |
| 2005 | — | #447 | 579 | |
| 2004 | — | #432 | 602 | |
| 2003 | — | #378 | 688 | |
| 2002 | — | #369 | 714 | |
| 2001 | — | #358 | 740 | |
| 2000 | #9,874 | 9 | #342 | 799 |
| 1999 | — | #321 | 868 | |
| 1998 | — | #319 | 866 | |
| 1997 | — | #280 | 995 | |
| 1996 | — | #267 | 1,055 | |
| 1995 | — | #256 | 1,099 | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #244 | 1,183 |
| 1993 | — | #225 | 1,309 | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #210 | 1,477 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #198 | 1,560 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #181 | 1,710 |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | #176 | 1,737 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | #162 | 1,730 |
| 1987 | #5,312 | 14 | #171 | 1,596 |
| 1986 | #4,539 | 17 | #166 | 1,629 |
| 1985 | #4,282 | 18 | #168 | 1,621 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | #165 | 1,626 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #161 | 1,692 |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | #145 | 1,947 |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | #135 | 2,028 |
| 1980 | #3,318 | 25 | #121 | 2,266 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #117 | 2,300 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #102 | 2,554 |
| 1977 | #2,780 | 29 | #97 | 2,703 |
| 1976 | #2,439 | 33 | #88 | 2,984 |
| 1975 | #2,516 | 31 | #76 | 3,583 |
| 1974 | #2,348 | 33 | #72 | 3,849 |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 | #68 | 4,059 |
| 1972 | #2,523 | 28 | #65 | 4,363 |
| 1971 | #1,857 | 47 | #59 | 5,195 |
| 1970 | #2,203 | 36 | #55 | 5,856 |
| 1969 | #1,809 | 46 | #49 | 6,669 |
| 1968 | #1,749 | 45 | #42 | 7,505 |
| 1967 | #1,702 | 45 | #37 | 8,440 |
| 1966 | #1,568 | 51 | #35 | 10,268 |
| 1965 | #1,655 | 46 | #33 | 11,086 |
| 1964 | #2,530 | 24 | #59 | 6,073 |
| 1963 | #2,364 | 26 | #76 | 5,193 |
| 1962 | #2,539 | 23 | #76 | 5,435 |
| 1961 | #2,150 | 30 | #72 | 5,660 |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 | #68 | 5,865 |
| 1959 | #2,869 | 17 | #67 | 5,917 |
| 1958 | #2,322 | 24 | #65 | 5,865 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | #70 | 5,862 |
| 1956 | #2,530 | 20 | #65 | 6,076 |
| 1955 | #2,971 | 15 | #65 | 6,047 |
| 1954 | #3,019 | 14 | #66 | 5,959 |
| 1953 | #2,699 | 16 | #58 | 6,536 |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #84 | 4,403 |
| 1951 | #2,937 | 13 | #84 | 4,296 |
| 1950 | #3,662 | 9 | #88 | 3,856 |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #87 | 3,826 |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | #92 | 3,466 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #94 | 3,564 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #93 | 3,304 |
| 1945 | #3,132 | 9 | #105 | 2,185 |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 | #123 | 1,781 |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #118 | 1,984 |
| 1942 | #3,738 | 7 | #121 | 1,788 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #127 | 1,551 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | #133 | 1,397 |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | #122 | 1,446 |
| 1938 | — | #133 | 1,302 | |
| 1937 | — | #151 | 1,025 | |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #152 | 1,009 |
| 1935 | — | #149 | 1,027 | |
| 1934 | — | #160 | 929 | |
| 1933 | — | #173 | 783 | |
| 1932 | — | #172 | 829 | |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | #186 | 706 |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #208 | 639 |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #233 | 539 |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #223 | 589 |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #236 | 562 |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #256 | 482 |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #271 | 447 |
| 1924 | — | #290 | 397 | |
| 1923 | — | #286 | 389 | |
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | #278 | 400 |
| 1921 | — | #297 | 361 | |
| 1920 | — | #304 | 353 | |
| 1919 | — | #312 | 315 | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #368 | 253 |
| 1917 | — | #363 | 234 | |
| 1916 | — | #349 | 237 | |
| 1915 | — | #349 | 235 | |
| 1914 | — | #336 | 189 | |
| 1913 | — | #363 | 131 | |
| 1912 | — | #416 | 88 | |
| 1911 | — | #357 | 59 | |
| 1910 | — | #474 | 34 | |
| 1909 | — | #519 | 25 | |
| 1908 | — | #475 | 27 | |
| 1907 | — | #616 | 17 | |
| 1906 | — | #400 | 29 | |
| 1905 | — | #507 | 20 | |
| 1904 | — | #647 | 13 | |
| 1903 | — | #619 | 13 | |
| 1902 | — | #490 | 19 | |
| 1901 | — | #683 | 10 | |
| 1900 | — | #518 | 21 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #452 | 20 | |
| 1897 | — | #473 | 17 | |
| 1896 | — | #551 | 14 | |
| 1895 | — | #456 | 19 | |
| 1894 | — | #730 | 9 | |
| 1893 | — | #419 | 19 | |
| 1892 | — | #497 | 16 | |
| 1891 | — | #564 | 11 | |
| 1890 | — | #415 | 19 | |
| 1889 | — | #673 | 9 | |
| 1888 | — | #580 | 12 | |
| 1887 | — | #631 | 9 | |
| 1886 | — | #491 | 14 | |
| 1885 | — | #521 | 13 | |
| 1884 | — | #520 | 13 | |
| 1883 | — | #556 | 11 | |
| 1882 | — | #540 | 12 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | #505 | 13 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Rodney was already there! It came in at #505, and was given to 13 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Rodney is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#34 · 1 in 124
- Idaho#35 · 1 in 141
- Nebraska#38 · 1 in 146
- Montana#40 · 1 in 155
- Iowa#41 · 1 in 164
Best ever in a state: #15 in North Carolina, 1965.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #34 | 63 | 1 in 124 |
| Idaho | #35 | 53 | 1 in 141 |
| Nebraska | #38 | 112 | 1 in 146 |
| Montana | #40 | 49 | 1 in 155 |
| Iowa | #41 | 191 | 1 in 164 |
| West Virginia | #41 | 94 | 1 in 202 |
| North Dakota | #43 | 53 | 1 in 139 |
| Nevada | #47 | 15 | 1 in 192 |
| Hawaii | #48 | 38 | 1 in 191 |
| Utah | #49 | 63 | 1 in 193 |
| Wyoming | #49 | 19 | 1 in 178 |
| Kansas | #52 | 117 | 1 in 196 |
| Louisiana | #52 | 186 | 1 in 227 |
| Colorado | #55 | 93 | 1 in 229 |
| Maryland | #55 | 115 | 1 in 285 |
| Missouri | #55 | 197 | 1 in 248 |
| District of Columbia | #58 | 50 | 1 in 298 |
| Vermont | #60 | 14 | 1 in 277 |
| Virginia | #61 | 140 | 1 in 302 |
| North Carolina | #62 | 185 | 1 in 282 |
| Kentucky | #64 | 114 | 1 in 311 |
| Michigan | #65 | 308 | 1 in 307 |
| Oklahoma | #65 | 93 | 1 in 255 |
| Alabama | #66 | 134 | 1 in 282 |
| Wisconsin | #70 | 135 | 1 in 356 |
| Illinois | #71 | 316 | 1 in 367 |
| Indiana | #71 | 165 | 1 in 329 |
| New Mexico | #71 | 49 | 1 in 280 |
| Ohio | #71 | 323 | 1 in 347 |
| Oregon | #71 | 65 | 1 in 278 |
| Texas | #72 | 381 | 1 in 322 |
| Minnesota | #75 | 115 | 1 in 369 |
| Florida | #77 | 158 | 1 in 347 |
| Arkansas | #80 | 53 | 1 in 364 |
| Georgia | #80 | 144 | 1 in 335 |
| Maine | #80 | 27 | 1 in 405 |
| Alaska | #81 | 10 | 1 in 321 |
| Pennsylvania | #82 | 258 | 1 in 465 |
| Tennessee | #82 | 103 | 1 in 383 |
| California | #83 | 450 | 1 in 413 |
| Washington | #83 | 89 | 1 in 348 |
| South Carolina | #97 | 69 | 1 in 411 |
| New Hampshire | #104 | 9 | 1 in 677 |
| New York | #109 | 247 | 1 in 726 |
| Mississippi | #113 | 53 | 1 in 507 |
| Arizona | #114 | 34 | 1 in 499 |
| Delaware | #122 | 7 | 1 in 728 |
| Rhode Island | #125 | 7 | 1 in 1,288 |
| Connecticut | #148 | 22 | 1 in 1,216 |
| New Jersey | #149 | 50 | 1 in 1,243 |
| Massachusetts | #152 | 30 | 1 in 1,906 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rodney
- 15 spots since 2024 (#1,076 → #1,091)
- 228 spots since 2020 (#863 → #1,091)
- 377 spots since 2015 (#714 → #1,091)
- Biggest jump: 274 spots in 1895 (#730 → #456)
- Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1894 (#419 → #730)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1965 at #33 (11,086 births)
- Births halved by 1971, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 32 yrs · run 1946–1977
- Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1880–2022
- Highest: 1 in 168 boys born in 1965 were named Rodney (0.60%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,670 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 29.2% of all boys named Rodney (72,194) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 112 | #491 (1886) | #580 |
| 1890s | 162 | #415 (1890) | #500 |
| 1900s | 194 | #400 (1906) | #547 |
| 1910s | 1,775 | #312 (1919) | #369 |
| 1920s | 4,519 | #223 (1928) | #267 |
| 1930s | 9,695 | #122 (1939) | #161 |
| 1940s | 24,846 | #87 (1949) | #109 |
| 1950s | 54,817 | #58 (1953) | #71 |
| 1960s | 72,194 | #33 (1965) | #55 |
| 1970s | 37,446 | #55 (1970) | #80 |
| 1980s | 17,872 | #121 (1980) | #157 |
| 1990s | 12,122 | #181 (1990) | #250 |
| 2000s | 6,466 | #342 (2000) | #421 |
| 2010s | 3,624 | #549 (2010) | #690 |
| 2020s | 1,306 | #863 (2020) | #1,020 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rodney in 1960
Top girls' names in 1960
Top boys' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 74,887 of them was named Rodney, which outranked 69.4% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,196Vernette28
- #2,196Willene28
- #2,196Wynne28
- #2,246Rodney27
- #2,246Alise27
- #2,246Allyn27
- #2,246Alycia27
- #2,307Adell26
- #2,307Alda26
- #2,307Alisia26
Tied with 60 names at #2,246; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,132,320 boys got a published name in 1960; 1 in 364 of them was named Rodney, which outranked 98.5% of the 4,598 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.