Rodrigo
Last seen for girls in 1986 at #10,912 · #491 for boys in 2025, 614 births
Given to boys >99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2007 · 1,177 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 27,754since 1918
Rodrigo over time
Rank among boys' names. Rodrigo has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #491 | 614 | |
| 2024 | — | #484 | 640 | |
| 2023 | — | #497 | 607 | |
| 2022 | — | #531 | 562 | |
| 2021 | — | #571 | 494 | |
| 2020 | — | #576 | 482 | |
| 2019 | — | #521 | 548 | |
| 2018 | — | #500 | 573 | |
| 2017 | — | #513 | 566 | |
| 2016 | — | #506 | 592 | |
| 2015 | — | #460 | 661 | |
| 2014 | — | #488 | 576 | |
| 2013 | — | #417 | 710 | |
| 2012 | — | #433 | 639 | |
| 2011 | — | #422 | 650 | |
| 2010 | — | #415 | 676 | |
| 2009 | — | #374 | 812 | |
| 2008 | — | #326 | 1,014 | |
| 2007 | — | #291 | 1,177 | |
| 2006 | — | #363 | 823 | |
| 2005 | — | #392 | 731 | |
| 2004 | — | #387 | 700 | |
| 2003 | — | #362 | 736 | |
| 2002 | — | #391 | 665 | |
| 2001 | — | #378 | 694 | |
| 2000 | — | #382 | 680 | |
| 1999 | — | #361 | 724 | |
| 1998 | — | #445 | 511 | |
| 1997 | — | #437 | 514 | |
| 1996 | — | #378 | 616 | |
| 1995 | — | #385 | 605 | |
| 1994 | — | #489 | 423 | |
| 1993 | — | #484 | 434 | |
| 1992 | — | #466 | 464 | |
| 1991 | — | #512 | 376 | |
| 1990 | — | #508 | 378 | |
| 1989 | — | #627 | 252 | |
| 1988 | — | #622 | 231 | |
| 1987 | — | #658 | 193 | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #586 | 231 |
| 1985 | — | #646 | 183 | |
| 1984 | — | #623 | 187 | |
| 1983 | — | #582 | 210 | |
| 1982 | — | #576 | 222 | |
| 1981 | — | #603 | 200 | |
| 1980 | — | #648 | 179 | |
| 1979 | — | #664 | 166 | |
| 1978 | — | #610 | 187 | |
| 1977 | — | #662 | 162 | |
| 1976 | — | #621 | 174 | |
| 1975 | — | #667 | 153 | |
| 1974 | — | #677 | 144 | |
| 1973 | — | #623 | 159 | |
| 1972 | — | #740 | 114 | |
| 1971 | — | #828 | 95 | |
| 1970 | — | #791 | 108 | |
| 1969 | — | #900 | 72 | |
| 1968 | — | #968 | 57 | |
| 1967 | — | #931 | 60 | |
| 1966 | — | #984 | 55 | |
| 1965 | — | #976 | 57 | |
| 1964 | — | #914 | 69 | |
| 1963 | — | #921 | 66 | |
| 1962 | — | #984 | 60 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,156 | 46 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,098 | 50 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,228 | 40 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,186 | 42 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,364 | 33 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,092 | 48 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,198 | 39 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,101 | 46 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,480 | 26 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,297 | 33 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,279 | 33 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,139 | 39 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,348 | 29 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,400 | 27 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,519 | 24 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,440 | 24 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,852 | 14 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,483 | 21 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,764 | 17 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,946 | 14 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,821 | 15 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,334 | 25 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,795 | 15 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,741 | 16 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,576 | 19 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,639 | 17 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,453 | 22 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,860 | 15 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,770 | 16 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,848 | 16 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,538 | 21 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,889 | 16 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,413 | 26 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,480 | 25 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,603 | 23 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,605 | 22 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,628 | 22 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,043 | 16 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,460 | 26 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,532 | 7 | |
| 1921 | — | #4,322 | 5 | |
| 1920 | — | #4,286 | 5 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #3,728 | 6 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rodrigo! It came in at #3,728, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1919–1921, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Rodrigo is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#184 · 1 in 779
- California#200 · 1 in 918
- Nevada#218 · 1 in 888
- Georgia#281 · 1 in 1,492
- Colorado#282 · 1 in 1,290
Best ever in a state: #172 in California, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #184 | 243 | 1 in 779 |
| California | #200 | 277 | 1 in 918 |
| Nevada | #218 | 17 | 1 in 888 |
| Georgia | #281 | 41 | 1 in 1,492 |
| Arizona | #282 | 30 | 1 in 1,447 |
| Colorado | #282 | 23 | 1 in 1,290 |
| Nebraska | #293 | 8 | 1 in 1,292 |
| Illinois | #307 | 44 | 1 in 1,699 |
| Arkansas | #327 | 9 | 1 in 1,690 |
| Washington | #339 | 22 | 1 in 1,693 |
| Virginia | #341 | 21 | 1 in 2,046 |
| Florida | #346 | 48 | 1 in 2,094 |
| North Carolina | #367 | 26 | 1 in 2,143 |
| Idaho | #393 | 5 | 1 in 1,839 |
| Utah | #406 | 11 | 1 in 2,156 |
| Alabama | #409 | 11 | 1 in 2,282 |
| Oregon | #414 | 9 | 1 in 2,237 |
| Maryland | #437 | 11 | 1 in 2,719 |
| New Jersey | #441 | 15 | 1 in 3,039 |
| New York | #478 | 33 | 1 in 3,307 |
| Wisconsin | #491 | 9 | 1 in 3,262 |
| Indiana | #500 | 11 | 1 in 3,481 |
| Oklahoma | #605 | 6 | 1 in 3,572 |
| Minnesota | #633 | 6 | 1 in 4,972 |
| South Carolina | #677 | 5 | 1 in 4,601 |
| Massachusetts | #679 | 5 | 1 in 6,404 |
| Tennessee | #693 | 7 | 1 in 5,388 |
| Missouri | #732 | 6 | 1 in 5,753 |
| Pennsylvania | #759 | 9 | 1 in 7,096 |
| Michigan | #862 | 7 | 1 in 7,343 |
| Ohio | #1,022 | 6 | 1 in 10,739 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rodrigo
- 7 spots since 2024 (#484 → #491)
- 85 spots since 2020 (#576 → #491)
- 31 spots since 2015 (#460 → #491)
- Biggest jump: 172 spots in 1962 (#1,156 → #984)
- Biggest drop: 72 spots in 1987 (#586 → #658)
- Debuted 1918
- Peaked 2007 at #291 (1,177 births)
- Births halved by 2014, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 64 yrs · run 1962–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,763 boys born in 2007 were named Rodrigo (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,782 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 28.9% of all boys named Rodrigo (8,032) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 6 | #3,728 (1918) | #3,728 |
| 1920s | 177 | #1,413 (1929) | #2,337 |
| 1930s | 173 | #1,453 (1935) | #1,711 |
| 1940s | 210 | #1,334 (1940) | #1,591 |
| 1950s | 379 | #1,092 (1956) | #1,236 |
| 1960s | 592 | #900 (1969) | #983 |
| 1970s | 1,462 | #610 (1978) | #688 |
| 1980s | 2,088 | #576 (1982) | #617 |
| 1990s | 5,045 | #361 (1999) | #447 |
| 2000s | 8,032 | #291 (2007) | #365 |
| 2010s | 6,191 | #415 (2010) | #468 |
| 2020s | 3,399 | #484 (2024) | #525 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rodrigo in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 2,012 of them was named Rodrigo, which outranked 97.8% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.