Romayne
Last seen for girls in 1969 at #5,057 · Last seen for boys in 1933 at #3,268
Given to girls 98.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1929 · 45 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,118since 1904
Romayne over time
Rank among girls' names. Romayne has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | — | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | — | |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,595 | 17 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,372 | 11 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1950 | #3,662 | 9 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | — | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | #4,574 | 5 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,214 | 16 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,029 | 16 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,638 | 22 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,225 | 14 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,914 | 17 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,244 | 33 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,556 | 23 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,470 | 25 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #1,147 | 39 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,175 | 37 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,274 | 35 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #1,094 | 45 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,097 | 47 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,331 | 36 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,667 | 25 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,272 | 38 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,301 | 38 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,556 | 28 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,611 | 27 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,437 | 32 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,375 | 33 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,423 | 30 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,380 | 31 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,377 | 29 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,227 | 34 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,475 | 24 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #1,344 | 22 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,528 | 15 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,540 | 13 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,267 | 13 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | #2,101 | 5 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Romayne! It came in at #1,659, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1905, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Romayne is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Pennsylvania#311 · 1 in 3,907
Best ever in a state: #267 in Pennsylvania, 1928.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #311 | 19 | 1 in 3,907 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Romayne
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1969
- Debuted 1904
- Peaked 1929 at #1,094 (45 births)
- Births halved by 1936, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 24,539 girls born in 1928 were named Romayne (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 187,446 girls born in 1969 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,094 in 1929, was only 1 in 24,812 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 31.2% of all girls named Romayne (349) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 35 | #1,229 (1906) | #1,692 |
| 1910s | 222 | #1,227 (1916) | #1,401 |
| 1920s | 349 | #1,094 (1929) | #1,374 |
| 1930s | 266 | #1,147 (1932) | #1,528 |
| 1940s | 118 | #2,029 (1940) | #2,809 |
| 1950s | 94 | #2,595 (1953) | #4,081 |
| 1960s | 34 | #4,773 (1960) | #5,651 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Romayne in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 27,363 of them was named Romayne, which outranked 77.5% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,130Nelma40
- #1,130Sabra40
- #1,130Vernita40
- #1,147Romayne39
- #1,147Alease39
- #1,147Alline39
- #1,147Aretha39
- #1,162Adelia38
- #1,162Arliss38
- #1,162Arlys38
Tied with 14 names at #1,147; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.