Romell
- Last seen for girls in 1966 at #5,809
- #4,396 for boys in 2025, 23 births
- Given to boys 93.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1979 · 33 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,484since 1944
Romell over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,396 | 23 | |
| 2024 | — | #5,659 | 16 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,742 | 21 | |
| 2022 | — | #4,303 | 24 | |
| 2021 | — | #4,628 | 21 | |
| 2020 | — | #4,540 | 21 | |
| 2019 | — | #4,003 | 26 | |
| 2018 | — | #4,354 | 23 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,889 | 27 | |
| 2016 | — | #3,990 | 26 | |
| 2015 | — | #3,513 | 31 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,929 | 39 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,964 | 25 | |
| 2012 | — | #3,059 | 37 | |
| 2011 | — | #3,364 | 32 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,377 | 32 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,721 | 28 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,286 | 34 | |
| 2007 | — | #4,375 | 22 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,024 | 36 | |
| 2005 | — | #3,389 | 29 | |
| 2004 | — | #3,636 | 25 | |
| 2003 | — | #4,616 | 17 | |
| 2002 | — | #3,259 | 27 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,931 | 31 | |
| 2000 | — | #2,805 | 32 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,182 | 25 | |
| 1998 | — | #2,782 | 29 | |
| 1997 | — | #2,823 | 27 | |
| 1996 | — | #3,406 | 20 | |
| 1995 | — | #2,299 | 34 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,618 | 28 | |
| 1993 | — | #3,042 | 22 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,338 | 19 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,469 | 28 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,488 | 27 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,989 | 20 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,203 | 16 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,942 | 17 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,290 | 24 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,828 | 17 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,723 | 33 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,955 | 27 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,518 | 19 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,138 | 24 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,367 | 21 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,711 | 33 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,794 | 29 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,556 | 17 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,932 | 25 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,246 | 11 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,050 | 21 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,405 | 16 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,158 | 18 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,366 | 16 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,399 | 15 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,062 | 9 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #3,249 | 7 |
| 1965 | — | #3,244 | 7 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | — | #3,041 | 8 | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,665 | 6 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | — | #2,964 | 8 | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #3,452 | 6 |
| 1953 | — | #2,709 | 9 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #3,364 | 6 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,109 | 6 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | — | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #3,449 | 7 | — | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | — | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #3,666 | 8 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Romell! It came in at #3,109, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1945–1950, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Romell is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#1,113 · 1 in 8,039
Best ever in a state: #505 in Ohio, 1976.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #1,113 | 5 | 1 in 8,039 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Romell
- 1,263 spots since 2024 (#5,659 → #4,396)
- 144 spots since 2020 (#4,540 → #4,396)
- 883 spots since 2015 (#3,513 → #4,396)
- Debuted 1944
- Peaked 1979 at #1,711 (33 births)
- Births halved by 1988, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 49,253 boys born in 2014 were named Romell (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 74,264 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,711 in 1979, was only 1 in 52,168 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 20.1% of all boys named Romell (298) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1964, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 6 | #3,109 (1944) | #3,109 |
| 1950s | 53 | #2,709 (1953) | #3,312 |
| 1960s | 42 | #3,041 (1962) | #3,385 |
| 1970s | 201 | #1,711 (1979) | #2,262 |
| 1980s | 218 | #1,723 (1984) | #2,495 |
| 1990s | 259 | #2,299 (1995) | #2,845 |
| 2000s | 281 | #2,805 (2000) | #3,504 |
| 2010s | 298 | #2,929 (2014) | #3,644 |
| 2020s | 126 | #4,303 (2022) | #4,711 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Romell ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: