Romey
- #7,885 for girls in 2025, 13 births
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to boys 58.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1910 · 5 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 327since 1910
Romey over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,885 | 13 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #5,799 | 21 | #8,987 | 8 |
| 2023 | #6,169 | 19 | — | |
| 2022 | #8,032 | 13 | — | |
| 2021 | #6,174 | 19 | — | |
| 2020 | #8,406 | 12 | — | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | — | |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #8,393 | 13 | — | |
| 2015 | #10,866 | 9 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | — | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #9,539 | 12 | — | |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 | — | |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | — | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #15,432 | 5 | — | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | — | #9,912 | 5 | |
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | #6,941 | 6 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | #5,484 | 6 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,050 | 8 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,337 | 7 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,290 | 7 | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #3,886 | 5 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,095 | 7 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,066 | 7 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,563 | 9 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,940 | 7 | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,130 | 6 | |
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | — | #3,534 | 5 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,680 | 8 | |
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | #3,390 | 6 | |
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | #2,980 | 8 | |
| 1928 | — | #4,151 | 5 | |
| 1927 | — | #3,451 | 7 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #3,260 | 8 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,446 | 12 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,014 | 9 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,214 | 8 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,967 | 9 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,665 | 10 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,398 | 12 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,956 | 8 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | #1,589 | 5 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1910
The first year at least five boys were named Romey! It came in at #1,589, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1910–1914, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Romey is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Romey in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Romey
Momentum · boys
Brand new
- 3,021 spots since 2024 (#8,987 → #12,008)
- 1,364 spots since 2015 (#10,644 → #12,008)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1910
- Peaked 1910 at #1,589 (5 births)
- Births halved by 1911, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 38,842
- Highest: 1 in 38,842 boys born in 1910 were named Romey (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 341,615 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 22.0% of all boys named Romey (72) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2000
- Mostly boys until 1999, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 55 | #1,589 (1910) | #2,594 |
| 1920s | 72 | #2,446 (1923) | #3,243 |
| 1930s | 37 | #2,680 (1937) | #3,203 |
| 1940s | 41 | #2,563 (1943) | #3,028 |
| 1950s | 33 | #3,066 (1951) | #3,296 |
| 1960s | 21 | #3,050 (1964) | #3,308 |
| 1970s | 6 | #5,123 (1977) | #5,123 |
| 1980s | 12 | #5,484 (1983) | #6,213 |
| 1990s | 10 | #9,631 (1998) | #9,772 |
| 2000s | 5 | #12,553 (2008) | #12,553 |
| 2010s | 22 | #10,644 (2015) | #11,463 |
| 2020s | 13 | #8,987 (2024) | #10,498 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Romey ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: