Roseanna
#4,172 for girls in 2025, 34 births
- Peak · girls
- 1950 · 275 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,881since 1880
Roseanna over time
Rank among girls' names. Roseanna has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,172 | 34 |
| 2024 | #4,560 | 30 |
| 2023 | #3,833 | 39 |
| 2022 | #3,963 | 37 |
| 2021 | #6,174 | 19 |
| 2020 | #5,487 | 22 |
| 2019 | #5,163 | 25 |
| 2018 | #6,010 | 20 |
| 2017 | #4,922 | 27 |
| 2016 | #6,901 | 17 |
| 2015 | #5,833 | 22 |
| 2014 | #4,768 | 29 |
| 2013 | #6,255 | 20 |
| 2012 | #6,110 | 21 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 |
| 2010 | #7,513 | 16 |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 |
| 2008 | #7,742 | 16 |
| 2007 | #6,552 | 20 |
| 2006 | #4,685 | 30 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 |
| 2004 | #5,744 | 21 |
| 2003 | #4,307 | 30 |
| 2002 | #3,978 | 32 |
| 2001 | #3,940 | 32 |
| 2000 | #4,079 | 30 |
| 1999 | #4,313 | 26 |
| 1998 | #3,831 | 30 |
| 1997 | #4,239 | 25 |
| 1996 | #2,510 | 50 |
| 1995 | #2,735 | 44 |
| 1994 | #3,168 | 36 |
| 1993 | #2,600 | 47 |
| 1992 | #3,091 | 37 |
| 1991 | #2,270 | 57 |
| 1990 | #1,813 | 79 |
| 1989 | #1,491 | 97 |
| 1988 | #1,551 | 85 |
| 1987 | #1,336 | 102 |
| 1986 | #1,380 | 93 |
| 1985 | #1,395 | 92 |
| 1984 | #1,067 | 131 |
| 1983 | #910 | 165 |
| 1982 | #958 | 155 |
| 1981 | #1,848 | 59 |
| 1980 | #1,749 | 63 |
| 1979 | #1,952 | 53 |
| 1978 | #1,581 | 68 |
| 1977 | #1,832 | 55 |
| 1976 | #1,638 | 60 |
| 1975 | #1,655 | 58 |
| 1974 | #1,438 | 70 |
| 1973 | #1,805 | 47 |
| 1972 | #1,526 | 61 |
| 1971 | #2,001 | 42 |
| 1970 | #1,474 | 68 |
| 1969 | #1,755 | 48 |
| 1968 | #1,291 | 73 |
| 1967 | #1,360 | 65 |
| 1966 | #1,488 | 55 |
| 1965 | #1,263 | 72 |
| 1964 | #1,482 | 58 |
| 1963 | #1,417 | 62 |
| 1962 | #1,627 | 48 |
| 1961 | #1,499 | 56 |
| 1960 | #1,181 | 85 |
| 1959 | #1,407 | 58 |
| 1958 | #1,310 | 65 |
| 1957 | #1,407 | 56 |
| 1956 | #1,228 | 72 |
| 1955 | #1,118 | 79 |
| 1954 | #1,186 | 71 |
| 1953 | #1,082 | 79 |
| 1952 | #808 | 126 |
| 1951 | #737 | 141 |
| 1950 | #486 | 275 |
| 1949 | #757 | 129 |
| 1948 | #1,422 | 42 |
| 1947 | #1,525 | 38 |
| 1946 | #1,481 | 35 |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 |
| 1944 | #1,808 | 22 |
| 1943 | #1,251 | 42 |
| 1942 | #1,206 | 43 |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 |
| 1940 | #1,347 | 31 |
| 1939 | #1,350 | 30 |
| 1938 | #1,596 | 23 |
| 1937 | #1,132 | 40 |
| 1936 | #1,345 | 29 |
| 1935 | #1,307 | 31 |
| 1934 | #1,372 | 28 |
| 1933 | #1,197 | 35 |
| 1932 | #1,147 | 39 |
| 1931 | #1,459 | 26 |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 |
| 1929 | #1,306 | 33 |
| 1928 | #1,097 | 47 |
| 1927 | #1,079 | 50 |
| 1926 | #1,181 | 42 |
| 1925 | #1,176 | 43 |
| 1924 | #1,188 | 44 |
| 1923 | #1,245 | 39 |
| 1922 | #1,342 | 35 |
| 1921 | #1,341 | 35 |
| 1920 | #1,255 | 37 |
| 1919 | #1,565 | 26 |
| 1918 | #1,451 | 29 |
| 1917 | #1,773 | 20 |
| 1916 | #1,485 | 25 |
| 1915 | #1,339 | 28 |
| 1914 | #1,199 | 26 |
| 1913 | #1,528 | 15 |
| 1912 | #1,252 | 18 |
| 1911 | #1,241 | 14 |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 |
| 1909 | #1,763 | 7 |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 |
| 1907 | #2,061 | 5 |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 |
| 1903 | #1,440 | 7 |
| 1902 | #1,320 | 8 |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 |
| 1900 | #1,561 | 7 |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,171 | 9 |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,292 | 7 |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 |
| 1892 | #861 | 12 |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 |
| 1889 | #1,147 | 6 |
| 1888 | #894 | 9 |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 |
| 1886 | #897 | 7 |
| 1885 | #842 | 7 |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 |
| 1883 | #615 | 10 |
| 1882 | #908 | 5 |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | #836 | 5 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Roseanna was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Roseanna is popular in 1959
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Pennsylvania#768 · 1 in 16,337
- New York#1,094 · 1 in 24,055
- California#1,481 · 1 in 33,270
Best ever in a state: #244 in Colorado, 1950.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #768 | 7 | 1 in 16,337 |
| New York | #1,094 | 7 | 1 in 24,055 |
| California | #1,481 | 5 | 1 in 33,270 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roseanna
- 388 spots since 2024 (#4,560 → #4,172)
- 1,315 spots since 2020 (#5,487 → #4,172)
- 1,661 spots since 2015 (#5,833 → #4,172)
- Biggest jump: 890 spots in 1982 (#1,848 → #958)
- Biggest drop: 409 spots in 1884 (#615 → #1,024)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1950 at #486 (275 births)
- Births halved by 1952, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 14 yrs · run 1885–1888
- Highest: 1 in 6,229 girls born in 1950 were named Roseanna (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 47,273 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.7% of all girls named Roseanna (1,042) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 63 | #615 (1883) | #883 |
| 1890s | 47 | #861 (1892) | #1,195 |
| 1900s | 76 | #1,135 (1908) | #1,515 |
| 1910s | 211 | #1,199 (1914) | #1,435 |
| 1920s | 405 | #1,079 (1927) | #1,221 |
| 1930s | 312 | #1,132 (1937) | #1,328 |
| 1940s | 429 | #757 (1949) | #1,427 |
| 1950s | 1,022 | #486 (1950) | #1,077 |
| 1960s | 622 | #1,181 (1960) | #1,436 |
| 1970s | 582 | #1,438 (1974) | #1,690 |
| 1980s | 1,042 | #910 (1983) | #1,369 |
| 1990s | 431 | #1,813 (1990) | #3,057 |
| 2000s | 251 | #3,940 (2001) | #5,357 |
| 2010s | 207 | #4,768 (2014) | #6,385 |
| 2020s | 181 | #3,833 (2023) | #4,698 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roseanna in 1959
Top girls' names in 1959
More about 1959
girls
2,023,462 girls got a published name in 1959; 1 in 34,887 of them was named Roseanna, which outranked 80.5% of the 7,202 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,396Stacia59
- #1,396Susann59
- #1,396Tamyra59
- #1,407Roseanna58
- #1,407Amalia58
- #1,407Clementine58
- #1,407Darci58
- #1,417Aurelia57
- #1,417Autumn57
- #1,417Cherryl57
Tied with 9 names at #1,407; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.