Roxann
#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- Peak · girls
- 1955 · 426 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,885since 1932
Roxann over time
Rank among girls' names. Roxann has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 |
| 2023 | #10,312 | 9 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 |
| 2021 | #10,292 | 9 |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | #12,448 | 7 |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 |
| 2017 | #14,124 | 6 |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 |
| 2014 | #8,485 | 13 |
| 2013 | #9,612 | 11 |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 |
| 2011 | #5,728 | 23 |
| 2010 | #5,977 | 22 |
| 2009 | #9,975 | 11 |
| 2008 | #5,750 | 24 |
| 2007 | #7,394 | 17 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 |
| 2001 | #6,322 | 17 |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 |
| 1999 | #5,661 | 18 |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 |
| 1997 | #6,844 | 13 |
| 1996 | #4,883 | 20 |
| 1995 | #4,099 | 25 |
| 1994 | #3,448 | 32 |
| 1993 | #3,290 | 34 |
| 1992 | #3,866 | 27 |
| 1991 | #2,790 | 42 |
| 1990 | #2,345 | 53 |
| 1989 | #1,851 | 71 |
| 1988 | #1,934 | 63 |
| 1987 | #1,404 | 95 |
| 1986 | #1,203 | 116 |
| 1985 | #1,143 | 125 |
| 1984 | #1,332 | 91 |
| 1983 | #1,358 | 88 |
| 1982 | #1,171 | 117 |
| 1981 | #1,277 | 100 |
| 1980 | #1,183 | 113 |
| 1979 | #1,047 | 133 |
| 1978 | #1,314 | 91 |
| 1977 | #1,303 | 89 |
| 1976 | #1,182 | 96 |
| 1975 | #1,100 | 106 |
| 1974 | #1,063 | 111 |
| 1973 | #1,028 | 114 |
| 1972 | #1,038 | 112 |
| 1971 | #828 | 167 |
| 1970 | #758 | 193 |
| 1969 | #786 | 170 |
| 1968 | #754 | 174 |
| 1967 | #761 | 167 |
| 1966 | #648 | 220 |
| 1965 | #673 | 214 |
| 1964 | #677 | 227 |
| 1963 | #632 | 257 |
| 1962 | #638 | 250 |
| 1961 | #550 | 321 |
| 1960 | #529 | 334 |
| 1959 | #550 | 312 |
| 1958 | #569 | 297 |
| 1957 | #526 | 329 |
| 1956 | #473 | 391 |
| 1955 | #429 | 426 |
| 1954 | #452 | 380 |
| 1953 | #460 | 339 |
| 1952 | #520 | 264 |
| 1951 | #537 | 243 |
| 1950 | #652 | 171 |
| 1949 | #973 | 84 |
| 1948 | #1,001 | 76 |
| 1947 | #1,068 | 69 |
| 1946 | #1,148 | 55 |
| 1945 | #1,080 | 53 |
| 1944 | #1,205 | 43 |
| 1943 | #1,342 | 37 |
| 1942 | #1,413 | 33 |
| 1941 | #1,501 | 27 |
| 1940 | #1,242 | 35 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 |
| 1938 | #1,650 | 22 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 |
| 1936 | #1,873 | 17 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 |
| 1933 | #2,540 | 11 |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Roxann! It came in at #3,901, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2020, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Roxann is popular in 1955
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#166 · 1 in 772
- South Dakota#175 · 1 in 851
- Iowa#197 · 1 in 1,237
- Nebraska#199 · 1 in 1,221
- Minnesota#213 · 1 in 1,582
Best ever in a state: #134 in North Dakota, 1956.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #166 | 9 | 1 in 772 |
| South Dakota | #175 | 9 | 1 in 851 |
| Iowa | #197 | 23 | 1 in 1,237 |
| Nebraska | #199 | 12 | 1 in 1,221 |
| Minnesota | #213 | 23 | 1 in 1,582 |
| Wisconsin | #218 | 22 | 1 in 1,894 |
| Pennsylvania | #306 | 36 | 1 in 3,133 |
| Indiana | #313 | 16 | 1 in 3,014 |
| Kansas | #325 | 8 | 1 in 2,712 |
| Utah | #328 | 5 | 1 in 2,047 |
| Michigan | #330 | 28 | 1 in 3,196 |
| Maryland | #356 | 8 | 1 in 3,590 |
| Connecticut | #370 | 5 | 1 in 4,601 |
| Missouri | #377 | 11 | 1 in 3,957 |
| West Virginia | #389 | 5 | 1 in 3,932 |
| Ohio | #405 | 21 | 1 in 4,857 |
| Illinois | #445 | 19 | 1 in 5,304 |
| California | #447 | 33 | 1 in 4,429 |
| Washington | #447 | 6 | 1 in 4,670 |
| South Carolina | #456 | 6 | 1 in 4,768 |
| New York | #463 | 30 | 1 in 5,446 |
| Oklahoma | #463 | 5 | 1 in 4,411 |
| Massachusetts | #488 | 5 | 1 in 10,279 |
| Florida | #508 | 7 | 1 in 5,659 |
| Georgia | #650 | 5 | 1 in 9,207 |
| Texas | #725 | 13 | 1 in 8,608 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roxann
- 2,085 spots since 2024 (#15,293 → #13,208)
- 1,274 spots since 2015 (#14,482 → #13,208)
- Biggest jump: 321 spots in 1950 (#973 → #652)
- Biggest drop: 210 spots in 1972 (#828 → #1,038)
- Debuted 1932
- Peaked 1955 at #429 (426 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 1949–1971
- Highest: 1 in 4,590 girls born in 1955 were named Roxann (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 35.5% of all girls named Roxann (3,152) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 102 | #1,650 (1938) | #2,550 |
| 1940s | 512 | #973 (1949) | #1,197 |
| 1950s | 3,152 | #429 (1955) | #517 |
| 1960s | 2,334 | #529 (1960) | #665 |
| 1970s | 1,212 | #758 (1970) | #1,066 |
| 1980s | 979 | #1,143 (1985) | #1,386 |
| 1990s | 278 | #2,345 (1990) | #4,395 |
| 2000s | 152 | #5,750 (2008) | #7,692 |
| 2010s | 126 | #5,728 (2011) | #9,810 |
| 2020s | 38 | #10,292 (2021) | #11,898 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roxann in 1955
Top girls' names in 1955
More about 1955
girls
1,955,277 girls got a published name in 1955; 1 in 4,590 of them was named Roxann, which outranked 93.6% of the 6,732 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.