Roxanna

#2,822 for girls in 2025, 60 births · Last seen for boys in 1987 at #5,459
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1954 · 245 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
13,459
since 1880

Roxanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Roxanna has never cracked the top 500 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201973peak #572, 1954girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,82260—
2024#3,22549—
2023#2,89158—
2022#2,66165—
2021#2,89258—
2020#2,58066—
2019#2,35576—
2018#2,14588—
2017#2,23684—
2016#2,12991—
2015#2,03996—
2014#1,876107—
2013#2,00297—
2012#1,719120—
2011#1,592136—
2010#1,402163—
2009#1,528148—
2008#1,589143—
2007#1,551147—
2006#1,514145—
2005#1,539133—
2004#1,373152—
2003#1,348150—
2002#1,411136—
2001#1,266155—
2000#1,481124—
1999#1,431122—
1998#1,508112—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,119162—
1995#1,049171—
1994#1,083166—
1993#1,054174—
1992#1,183148—
1991#988190—
1990#905212—
1989#766254—
1988#628316—
1987#634301#5,4597
1986#851195—
1985#853189—
1984#894167—
1983#828185—
1982#846184—
1981#846184—
1980#1,152117—
1979#981146—
1978#1,063125—
1977#1,034128—
1976#964132—
1975#910143—
1974#1,003120—
1973#911135—
1972#800169—
1971#807173—
1970#840161—
1969#757177—
1968#789162—
1967#812150—
1966#736179—
1965#745180—
1964#793172—
1963#640250—
1962#660237—
1961#614273—
1960#635254—
1959#757180—
1958#751176—
1957#758173—
1956#673204—
1955#642208—
1954#572245—
1953#684175—
1952#712156—
1951#651177—
1950#703149—
1949#879100—
1948#849106—
1947#92991—
1946#84995—
1945#84979—
1944#90072—
1943#88977—
1942#1,16246—
1941#1,06547—
1940#1,08045—
1939#1,07944—
1938#1,07944—
1937#98151—
1936#97949—
1935#1,38128—
1934#1,31730—
1933#1,65821—
1932#1,75420—
1931#1,80319—
1930#1,56925—
1929#2,01117—
1928#1,73823—
1927#1,82822—
1926#1,93220—
1925#2,01819—
1924#1,92621—
1923#1,94420—
1922#1,95720—
1921#1,86722—
1920#2,07918—
1919#1,60425—
1918#1,80521—
1917#1,70821—
1916#2,02816—
1915#2,05015—
1914#1,54118—
1913#1,67013—
1912#1,71911—
1911#1,9567—
1910#1,33512—
1909——
1908#1,4399—
1907——
1906#1,15411—
1905——
1904#1,17010—
1903#93114—
1902#1,5946—
1901#1,1369—
1900#1,10612—
1899#1,3946—
1898#1,00912—
1897#1,2637—
1896——
1895#1,5925—
1894#1,3536—
1893#1,4375—
1892#1,2786—
1891#1,0068—
1890#1,0997—
1889#1,2795—
1888#8949—
1887——
1886#7789—
1885#9216—
1884#8517—
1883#9205—
1882#6788—
1881——
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Roxanna was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Roxanna is popular in 1973

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,154 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 14,043 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMINew York: #1,114 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 12,918 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedIAIndiana: #652 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,090 girlsINOhio: #733 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 8,781 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #697 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 5,687 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedDEArizona: #446 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,464 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedHITexas: #475 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 2,949 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Arizona#446 · 1 in 2,464
  2. Texas#475 · 1 in 2,949
  3. Indiana#652 · 1 in 7,090
  4. California#697 · 1 in 5,687
  5. Ohio#733 · 1 in 8,781

Best ever in a state: #226 in Oregon, 1950.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arizona#44661 in 2,464
Texas#475321 in 2,949
Indiana#65251 in 7,090
California#697231 in 5,687
Ohio#73381 in 8,781
New York#1,11481 in 12,918
Illinois#1,15451 in 14,043
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Roxanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 403 spots since 2024 (#3,225 → #2,822)
  • 242 spots since 2020 (#2,580 → #2,822)
  • 783 spots since 2015 (#2,039 → #2,822)
  • Biggest jump: 663 spots in 1903 (#1,594 → #931)
  • Biggest drop: 385 spots in 1889 (#894 → #1,279)
Rise & fade · girls
74 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1954 at #572 (245 births)
  • Births halved by 1974, 20 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 55 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 55 yrs · run 1943–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,636
  • Highest: 1 in 5,636 girls born in 1988 were named Roxanna (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 26,788 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #572 in 1954, was only 1 in 7,926 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 15.5% of all girls named Roxanna (2,092) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s58#580 (1880)#863
1890s62#1,006 (1891)#1,270
1900s71#931 (1903)#1,219
1910s159#1,335 (1910)#1,742
1920s202#1,738 (1928)#1,930
1930s331#979 (1936)#1,360
1940s758#849 (1948)#945
1950s1,843#572 (1954)#690
1960s2,034#614 (1961)#718
1970s1,432#800 (1972)#931
1980s2,092#628 (1988)#830
1990s1,570#905 (1990)#1,178
2000s1,433#1,266 (2001)#1,460
2010s1,058#1,402 (2010)#1,950
2020s356#2,580 (2020)#2,845

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Roxanna in 1973

girls
#911
135 births · 1 in 10,802 girls

Top girls' names in 1973

  1. #1Jennifer62,448
  2. #2Amy26,962
  3. #3Michelle26,935
  4. #4Kimberly23,531
  5. #5Lisa22,677
  6. #6Melissa22,479
  7. #7Angela20,898
  8. #8Heather19,347
  9. #9Stephanie17,263
  10. #10Rebecca14,868
  11. #911Roxanna135
More about 1973

girls

1,458,209 girls got a published name in 1973; 1 in 10,802 of them was named Roxanna, which outranked 90.7% of the 9,810 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Roxanna
  1. #908Kirstin137
  2. #908Tamatha137
  3. #910Nellie136
  4. #911Roxanna135
  5. #911Elvira135
  6. #911Lila135
  7. #911Mariah135
  8. #917Anika134
  9. #917Brenna134
  10. #917Brook134

Tied with 5 names at #911; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1972
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,091Cicely#4,793 → #702
  2. ↑ 2,295Aubrey#3,177 → #882
  3. ↑ 1,847Nyree#2,680 → #833
  4. ↑ 1,533Danyell#2,523 → #990
  5. ↑ 1,496Vonetta#2,311 → #815
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,814Camisha#815 → #2,629
  2. ↓ 470Andra#904 → #1,374
  3. ↓ 416Cherilyn#823 → #1,239
  4. ↓ 284Keena#848 → #1,132
  5. ↓ 281Nicolle#734 → #1,015

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1973 →