Roxanna

#2,822 for girls in 2025, 60 births · Last seen for boys in 1987 at #5,459
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1954 · 245 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
13,459
since 1880

Roxanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Roxanna has never cracked the top 500 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201990peak #572, 1954girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,82260—
2024#3,22549—
2023#2,89158—
2022#2,66165—
2021#2,89258—
2020#2,58066—
2019#2,35576—
2018#2,14588—
2017#2,23684—
2016#2,12991—
2015#2,03996—
2014#1,876107—
2013#2,00297—
2012#1,719120—
2011#1,592136—
2010#1,402163—
2009#1,528148—
2008#1,589143—
2007#1,551147—
2006#1,514145—
2005#1,539133—
2004#1,373152—
2003#1,348150—
2002#1,411136—
2001#1,266155—
2000#1,481124—
1999#1,431122—
1998#1,508112—
1997#1,456113—
1996#1,119162—
1995#1,049171—
1994#1,083166—
1993#1,054174—
1992#1,183148—
1991#988190—
1990#905212—
1989#766254—
1988#628316—
1987#634301#5,4597
1986#851195—
1985#853189—
1984#894167—
1983#828185—
1982#846184—
1981#846184—
1980#1,152117—
1979#981146—
1978#1,063125—
1977#1,034128—
1976#964132—
1975#910143—
1974#1,003120—
1973#911135—
1972#800169—
1971#807173—
1970#840161—
1969#757177—
1968#789162—
1967#812150—
1966#736179—
1965#745180—
1964#793172—
1963#640250—
1962#660237—
1961#614273—
1960#635254—
1959#757180—
1958#751176—
1957#758173—
1956#673204—
1955#642208—
1954#572245—
1953#684175—
1952#712156—
1951#651177—
1950#703149—
1949#879100—
1948#849106—
1947#92991—
1946#84995—
1945#84979—
1944#90072—
1943#88977—
1942#1,16246—
1941#1,06547—
1940#1,08045—
1939#1,07944—
1938#1,07944—
1937#98151—
1936#97949—
1935#1,38128—
1934#1,31730—
1933#1,65821—
1932#1,75420—
1931#1,80319—
1930#1,56925—
1929#2,01117—
1928#1,73823—
1927#1,82822—
1926#1,93220—
1925#2,01819—
1924#1,92621—
1923#1,94420—
1922#1,95720—
1921#1,86722—
1920#2,07918—
1919#1,60425—
1918#1,80521—
1917#1,70821—
1916#2,02816—
1915#2,05015—
1914#1,54118—
1913#1,67013—
1912#1,71911—
1911#1,9567—
1910#1,33512—
1909——
1908#1,4399—
1907——
1906#1,15411—
1905——
1904#1,17010—
1903#93114—
1902#1,5946—
1901#1,1369—
1900#1,10612—
1899#1,3946—
1898#1,00912—
1897#1,2637—
1896——
1895#1,5925—
1894#1,3536—
1893#1,4375—
1892#1,2786—
1891#1,0068—
1890#1,0997—
1889#1,2795—
1888#8949—
1887——
1886#7789—
1885#9216—
1884#8517—
1883#9205—
1882#6788—
1881——
1880#5809—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Roxanna was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Roxanna is popular in 1990

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,028 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 9,813 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMINew York: #1,392 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 15,257 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #447 for girls · 95 births · 1 in 2,763 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedDEArizona: #374 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,020 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedALGeorgia: #835 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,111 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Roxanna, so not publishedHITexas: #551 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 3,931 girlsTXFlorida: #1,022 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 9,891 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Arizona#374 · 1 in 2,020
  2. California#447 · 1 in 2,763
  3. Texas#551 · 1 in 3,931
  4. Georgia#835 · 1 in 7,111
  5. Florida#1,022 · 1 in 9,891

Best ever in a state: #226 in Oregon, 1950.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Arizona#374131 in 2,020
California#447951 in 2,763
Texas#551351 in 3,931
Georgia#83561 in 7,111
Florida#1,02281 in 9,891
Illinois#1,02881 in 9,813
New York#1,39281 in 15,257
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Roxanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 403 spots since 2024 (#3,225 → #2,822)
  • 242 spots since 2020 (#2,580 → #2,822)
  • 783 spots since 2015 (#2,039 → #2,822)
  • Biggest jump: 663 spots in 1903 (#1,594 → #931)
  • Biggest drop: 385 spots in 1889 (#894 → #1,279)
Rise & fade · girls
74 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1954 at #572 (245 births)
  • Births halved by 1974, 20 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 55 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 55 yrs · run 1943–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,636
  • Highest: 1 in 5,636 girls born in 1988 were named Roxanna (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 26,788 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #572 in 1954, was only 1 in 7,926 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 15.5% of all girls named Roxanna (2,092) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s58#580 (1880)#863
1890s62#1,006 (1891)#1,270
1900s71#931 (1903)#1,219
1910s159#1,335 (1910)#1,742
1920s202#1,738 (1928)#1,930
1930s331#979 (1936)#1,360
1940s758#849 (1948)#945
1950s1,843#572 (1954)#690
1960s2,034#614 (1961)#718
1970s1,432#800 (1972)#931
1980s2,092#628 (1988)#830
1990s1,570#905 (1990)#1,178
2000s1,433#1,266 (2001)#1,460
2010s1,058#1,402 (2010)#1,950
2020s356#2,580 (2020)#2,845

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Roxanna in 1990

girls
#905
212 births · 1 in 8,955 girls

Top girls' names in 1990

  1. #1Jessica46,486
  2. #2Ashley45,561
  3. #3Brittany36,536
  4. #4Amanda34,413
  5. #5Samantha25,868
  6. #6Sarah25,824
  7. #7Stephanie24,864
  8. #8Jennifer22,236
  9. #9Elizabeth20,750
  10. #10Lauren20,506
  11. #905Roxanna212
More about 1990

girls

1,898,547 girls got a published name in 1990; 1 in 8,955 of them was named Roxanna, which outranked 94.1% of the 15,234 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Roxanna
  1. #900Joana213
  2. #900Katheryn213
  3. #900Marcia213
  4. #905Roxanna212
  5. #905Catrina212
  6. #905Gabriel212
  7. #905Lourdes212
  8. #910Dominque211
  9. #911Brooklyn210
  10. #911Dulce210

Tied with 4 names at #905; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1989
Risers
  1. ↑ 5,592Alannah#6,531 → #939
  2. ↑ 1,178Symone#1,998 → #820
  3. ↑ 869Shelbi#1,750 → #881
  4. ↑ 831Latifah#1,532 → #701
  5. ↑ 828Skyler#1,564 → #736
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,554Elizabet#524 → #3,078
  2. ↓ 1,572Katherin#717 → #2,289
  3. ↓ 652Stephani#390 → #1,042
  4. ↓ 504Ashanti#893 → #1,397
  5. ↓ 416Audrianna#759 → #1,175

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1990 →