Roxie
#3,903 for girls in 2025, 37 births · Last seen for boys in 1960 at #4,038
Given to girls 98.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1881 · 72 births
- Debut · girls
- 62 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 18,412since 1880
Roxie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Roxie has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,903 | 37 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,225 | 49 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,873 | 27 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,653 | 42 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,553 | 43 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,450 | 44 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,004 | 54 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,436 | 45 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,182 | 51 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,024 | 56 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,080 | 54 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,568 | 70 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,124 | 90 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,906 | 59 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,409 | 48 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,887 | 61 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,822 | 64 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,073 | 36 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,809 | 38 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,668 | 27 | — | |
| 2002 | #4,498 | 27 | — | |
| 2001 | #4,834 | 24 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,125 | 26 | — | |
| 1996 | #4,059 | 26 | — | |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 | — | |
| 1994 | #4,845 | 20 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,351 | 33 | — | |
| 1992 | #4,528 | 22 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,935 | 39 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,464 | 49 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,572 | 44 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,802 | 69 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,156 | 50 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,025 | 53 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,100 | 50 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,111 | 47 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,552 | 35 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,581 | 36 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,061 | 50 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,069 | 50 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,857 | 57 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,962 | 49 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,002 | 48 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,060 | 42 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,780 | 52 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,630 | 57 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,805 | 47 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,786 | 48 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,500 | 67 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,354 | 77 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,234 | 82 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,133 | 89 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,239 | 74 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,232 | 76 | — | |
| 1965 | #944 | 117 | — | |
| 1964 | #920 | 129 | — | |
| 1963 | #929 | 129 | — | |
| 1962 | #879 | 143 | — | |
| 1961 | #802 | 170 | — | |
| 1960 | #854 | 147 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #741 | 188 | — | |
| 1958 | #833 | 149 | — | |
| 1957 | #715 | 194 | — | |
| 1956 | #584 | 259 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #582 | 247 | #3,201 | 7 |
| 1954 | #541 | 269 | #2,942 | 8 |
| 1953 | #561 | 242 | — | |
| 1952 | #564 | 237 | — | |
| 1951 | #550 | 234 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #578 | 209 | — | |
| 1949 | #575 | 213 | — | |
| 1948 | #582 | 208 | — | |
| 1947 | #584 | 212 | — | |
| 1946 | #562 | 200 | #2,919 | 7 |
| 1945 | #532 | 186 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #504 | 204 | — | |
| 1943 | #510 | 214 | — | |
| 1942 | #521 | 203 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #550 | 162 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1940 | #511 | 184 | #2,179 | 11 |
| 1939 | #493 | 183 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #527 | 164 | — | |
| 1937 | #505 | 169 | — | |
| 1936 | #518 | 159 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #499 | 162 | — | |
| 1934 | #461 | 196 | — | |
| 1933 | #496 | 166 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #479 | 190 | — | |
| 1931 | #481 | 178 | — | |
| 1930 | #494 | 183 | — | |
| 1929 | #537 | 160 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #488 | 197 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #530 | 178 | #3,151 | 8 |
| 1926 | #469 | 217 | — | |
| 1925 | #427 | 260 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #416 | 278 | #2,822 | 10 |
| 1923 | #474 | 211 | #4,239 | 5 |
| 1922 | #395 | 278 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #421 | 257 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #393 | 282 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #371 | 305 | #3,115 | 8 |
| 1918 | #369 | 309 | #2,699 | 10 |
| 1917 | #388 | 265 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #375 | 277 | #3,516 | 6 |
| 1915 | #341 | 301 | — | |
| 1914 | #343 | 237 | #2,271 | 9 |
| 1913 | #330 | 212 | — | |
| 1912 | #320 | 204 | — | |
| 1911 | #306 | 168 | #1,740 | 5 |
| 1910 | #297 | 169 | — | |
| 1909 | #285 | 159 | — | |
| 1908 | #278 | 162 | — | |
| 1907 | #258 | 178 | — | |
| 1906 | #254 | 165 | — | |
| 1905 | #240 | 174 | — | |
| 1904 | #255 | 153 | — | |
| 1903 | #234 | 163 | — | |
| 1902 | #232 | 170 | — | |
| 1901 | #215 | 179 | — | |
| 1900 | #215 | 208 | — | |
| 1899 | #221 | 151 | — | |
| 1898 | #223 | 171 | — | |
| 1897 | #230 | 144 | — | |
| 1896 | #240 | 132 | — | |
| 1895 | #231 | 141 | — | |
| 1894 | #237 | 127 | — | |
| 1893 | #234 | 127 | — | |
| 1892 | #209 | 148 | — | |
| 1891 | #220 | 120 | — | |
| 1890 | #205 | 135 | — | |
| 1889 | #206 | 125 | — | |
| 1888 | #192 | 136 | — | |
| 1887 | #190 | 111 | — | |
| 1886 | #205 | 92 | — | |
| 1885 | #200 | 88 | — | |
| 1884 | #178 | 100 | — | |
| 1883 | #199 | 75 | — | |
| 1882 | #194 | 72 | — | |
| 1881 | #177 | 72 | — | |
| 1880 | #195 | 62 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Roxie was already there! It came in at #195, and was given to 62 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1998–2000, when fewer than 15 girls a year got the name.
Where Roxie is popular in 1912
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Kentucky#119 · 1 in 470
- Arkansas#132 · 1 in 475
- Tennessee#175 · 1 in 832
- West Virginia#182 · 1 in 885
- Mississippi#204 · 1 in 1,106
Best ever in a state: #114 in Kentucky, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #119 | 29 | 1 in 470 |
| Arkansas | #132 | 20 | 1 in 475 |
| Tennessee | #175 | 16 | 1 in 832 |
| West Virginia | #182 | 9 | 1 in 885 |
| Mississippi | #204 | 11 | 1 in 1,106 |
| North Carolina | #208 | 14 | 1 in 1,217 |
| Florida | #212 | 5 | 1 in 1,079 |
| Virginia | #224 | 9 | 1 in 1,574 |
| Georgia | #229 | 13 | 1 in 1,523 |
| Alabama | #243 | 10 | 1 in 1,583 |
| Oklahoma | #246 | 7 | 1 in 1,443 |
| Missouri | #274 | 8 | 1 in 1,904 |
| Texas | #275 | 20 | 1 in 1,316 |
| Louisiana | #288 | 7 | 1 in 1,704 |
| South Carolina | #290 | 5 | 1 in 2,349 |
| Ohio | #360 | 5 | 1 in 4,595 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Roxie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 678 spots since 2024 (#3,225 → #3,903)
- 453 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,903)
- 879 spots since 2015 (#3,024 → #3,903)
- Biggest jump: 92 spots in 1959 (#833 → #741)
- Biggest drop: 288 spots in 1966 (#944 → #1,232)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1881 at #177 (72 births)
- Births halved by 1982, 101 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 86 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 86 yrs · run 1880–1965
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,277
- Highest: 1 in 1,277 girls born in 1881 were named Roxie (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 43,440 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
- 13.3% of all girls named Roxie (2,447) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 933 | #177 (1881) | #194 |
| 1890s | 1,396 | #205 (1890) | #225 |
| 1900s | 1,711 | #215 (1900) | #247 |
| 1910s | 2,447 | #297 (1910) | #344 |
| 1920s | 2,318 | #393 (1920) | #455 |
| 1930s | 1,750 | #461 (1934) | #495 |
| 1940s | 1,986 | #504 (1944) | #543 |
| 1950s | 2,228 | #541 (1954) | #625 |
| 1960s | 1,156 | #802 (1961) | #1,017 |
| 1970s | 544 | #1,354 (1970) | #1,774 |
| 1980s | 484 | #1,802 (1988) | #2,203 |
| 1990s | 256 | #2,464 (1990) | #4,652 |
| 2000s | 366 | #2,822 (2007) | #4,297 |
| 2010s | 595 | #2,124 (2011) | #2,925 |
| 2020s | 242 | #3,225 (2024) | #3,776 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Roxie in 1912
girls
#320
204 births · 1 in 2,736 girls
Top girls' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 2,736 of them was named Roxie, which outranked 90.7% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Roxie
Biggest movers since 1911
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.