Roxie

#3,903 for girls in 2025, 37 births · Last seen for boys in 1960 at #4,038
Given to girls 98.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1881 · 72 births
Debut · girls
62 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
18,412
since 1880

Roxie over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Roxie has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201969peak #177, 1881girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,90337—
2024#3,22549—
2023#4,87327—
2022#3,65342—
2021#3,55343—
2020#3,45044—
2019#3,38846—
2018#3,00454—
2017#3,43645—
2016#3,18251—
2015#3,02456—
2014#3,08054—
2013#2,53370—
2012#2,56870—
2011#2,12490—
2010#2,90659—
2009#3,40948—
2008#2,88761—
2007#2,82264—
2006#4,07336—
2005#3,80938—
2004#4,81627—
2003#4,66827—
2002#4,49827—
2001#4,83424—
2000#7,15814—
1999#7,23913—
1998#6,71914—
1997#4,12526—
1996#4,05926—
1995#6,25714—
1994#4,84520—
1993#3,35133—
1992#4,52822—
1991#2,93539—
1990#2,46449—
1989#2,57244—
1988#1,80269—
1987#2,15650—
1986#2,02553—
1985#2,10050—
1984#2,11147—
1983#2,55235—
1982#2,58136—
1981#2,06150—
1980#2,06950—
1979#1,85757—
1978#1,96249—
1977#2,00248—
1976#2,06042—
1975#1,78052—
1974#1,63057—
1973#1,80547—
1972#1,78648—
1971#1,50067—
1970#1,35477—
1969#1,23482—
1968#1,13389—
1967#1,23974—
1966#1,23276—
1965#944117—
1964#920129—
1963#929129—
1962#879143—
1961#802170—
1960#854147#4,0385
1959#741188—
1958#833149—
1957#715194—
1956#584259#3,9425
1955#582247#3,2017
1954#541269#2,9428
1953#561242—
1952#564237—
1951#550234#2,6629
1950#578209—
1949#575213—
1948#582208—
1947#584212—
1946#562200#2,9197
1945#532186#3,3385
1944#504204—
1943#510214—
1942#521203#3,2126
1941#550162#1,99713
1940#511184#2,17911
1939#493183#3,1136
1938#527164—
1937#505169—
1936#518159#3,1476
1935#499162—
1934#461196—
1933#496166#3,2686
1932#479190—
1931#481178—
1930#494183—
1929#537160#3,5596
1928#488197#3,6976
1927#530178#3,1518
1926#469217—
1925#427260#3,4087
1924#416278#2,82210
1923#474211#4,2395
1922#395278#2,63011
1921#421257#3,5177
1920#393282#3,8156
1919#371305#3,1158
1918#369309#2,69910
1917#388265#3,9815
1916#375277#3,5166
1915#341301—
1914#343237#2,2719
1913#330212—
1912#320204—
1911#306168#1,7405
1910#297169—
1909#285159—
1908#278162—
1907#258178—
1906#254165—
1905#240174—
1904#255153—
1903#234163—
1902#232170—
1901#215179—
1900#215208—
1899#221151—
1898#223171—
1897#230144—
1896#240132—
1895#231141—
1894#237127—
1893#234127—
1892#209148—
1891#220120—
1890#205135—
1889#206125—
1888#192136—
1887#190111—
1886#20592—
1885#20088—
1884#178100—
1883#19975—
1882#19472—
1881#17772—
1880#19562—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Roxie was already there! It came in at #195, and was given to 62 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1998–2000, when fewer than 15 girls a year got the name.

Where Roxie is popular in 1969

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMOKentucky: #501 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,936 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedARTennessee: #510 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,064 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #405 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,566 girlsLAMississippi: #504 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,722 girlsMSAlabama: #529 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,359 girlsALGeorgia: #630 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,363 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedHITexas: #1,226 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 16,756 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Roxie, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Louisiana#405 · 1 in 2,566
  2. Kentucky#501 · 1 in 4,936
  3. Mississippi#504 · 1 in 3,722
  4. Tennessee#510 · 1 in 5,064
  5. Alabama#529 · 1 in 4,359

Best ever in a state: #114 in Kentucky, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Louisiana#405121 in 2,566
Kentucky#50151 in 4,936
Mississippi#50451 in 3,722
Tennessee#51061 in 5,064
Alabama#52961 in 4,359
Georgia#63061 in 6,363
Texas#1,22661 in 16,756
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Roxie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 678 spots since 2024 (#3,225 → #3,903)
  • 453 spots since 2020 (#3,450 → #3,903)
  • 879 spots since 2015 (#3,024 → #3,903)
  • Biggest jump: 92 spots in 1959 (#833 → #741)
  • Biggest drop: 288 spots in 1966 (#944 → #1,232)
Rise & fade · girls
1 yr to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1881 at #177 (72 births)
  • Births halved by 1982, 101 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 86 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 86 yrs · run 1880–1965
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,277
  • Highest: 1 in 1,277 girls born in 1881 were named Roxie (0.08%)
  • Latest: 1 in 43,440 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
  • 13.3% of all girls named Roxie (2,447) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s933#177 (1881)#194
1890s1,396#205 (1890)#225
1900s1,711#215 (1900)#247
1910s2,447#297 (1910)#344
1920s2,318#393 (1920)#455
1930s1,750#461 (1934)#495
1940s1,986#504 (1944)#543
1950s2,228#541 (1954)#625
1960s1,156#802 (1961)#1,017
1970s544#1,354 (1970)#1,774
1980s484#1,802 (1988)#2,203
1990s256#2,464 (1990)#4,652
2000s366#2,822 (2007)#4,297
2010s595#2,124 (2011)#2,925
2020s242#3,225 (2024)#3,776

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Roxie in 1969

girls
#1,234
82 births · 1 in 20,573 girls

Top girls' names in 1969

  1. #1Lisa45,028
  2. #2Michelle34,319
  3. #3Jennifer33,705
  4. #4Kimberly33,077
  5. #5Melissa23,018
  6. #6Amy21,464
  7. #7Angela21,060
  8. #8Mary19,850
  9. #9Tammy19,053
  10. #10Laura17,922
  11. #1,234Roxie82
More about 1969

girls

1,687,016 girls got a published name in 1969; 1 in 20,573 of them was named Roxie, which outranked 85.8% of the 8,708 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Roxie
  1. #1,226Shane83
  2. #1,226Sophie83
  3. #1,226Sunny83
  4. #1,234Roxie82
  5. #1,234Alfreda82
  6. #1,234Dalia82
  7. #1,234Donya82
  8. #1,242Annamaria81
  9. #1,242Chanel81
  10. #1,242Dannette81

Tied with 7 names at #1,234; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1968
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,462Shani#2,126 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,203Julissa#2,164 → #961
  3. ↑ 1,133Chelsea#1,834 → #701
  4. ↑ 667Latasha#1,519 → #852
  5. ↑ 549Britt#1,519 → #970
Fallers
  1. ↓ 455Tamiko#552 → #1,007
  2. ↓ 345Alesia#697 → #1,042
  3. ↓ 324Vickey#966 → #1,290
  4. ↓ 308Bettina#746 → #1,054
  5. ↓ 293Cammie#846 → #1,139

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1969 →