Ruben
Last seen for girls in 2009 at #15,242 · #480 for boys in 2025, 632 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1980 · 1,487 births
- Debut · boys
- 30 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 116,552since 1880
Ruben over time
Rank among boys' names. Ruben has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #480 | 632 | |
| 2024 | — | #504 | 607 | |
| 2023 | — | #481 | 629 | |
| 2022 | — | #458 | 670 | |
| 2021 | — | #460 | 653 | |
| 2020 | — | #465 | 637 | |
| 2019 | — | #415 | 743 | |
| 2018 | — | #416 | 753 | |
| 2017 | — | #418 | 749 | |
| 2016 | — | #396 | 801 | |
| 2015 | — | #374 | 864 | |
| 2014 | — | #359 | 893 | |
| 2013 | — | #355 | 889 | |
| 2012 | — | #329 | 959 | |
| 2011 | — | #323 | 977 | |
| 2010 | — | #297 | 1,102 | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #282 | 1,199 |
| 2008 | — | #257 | 1,356 | |
| 2007 | — | #243 | 1,479 | |
| 2006 | — | #225 | 1,597 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #234 | 1,466 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #218 | 1,601 |
| 2003 | — | #215 | 1,655 | |
| 2002 | — | #219 | 1,572 | |
| 2001 | — | #207 | 1,736 | |
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | #206 | 1,718 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #209 | 1,637 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #205 | 1,583 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #199 | 1,595 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #190 | 1,663 |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #184 | 1,697 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #181 | 1,725 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 | #184 | 1,749 |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | #178 | 1,805 |
| 1991 | #5,181 | 18 | #183 | 1,732 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #178 | 1,744 |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | #186 | 1,598 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #178 | 1,594 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #180 | 1,527 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #186 | 1,382 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 | #180 | 1,454 |
| 1984 | #4,478 | 16 | #183 | 1,374 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #174 | 1,497 |
| 1982 | #5,209 | 13 | #177 | 1,472 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #169 | 1,473 |
| 1980 | #3,719 | 21 | #165 | 1,487 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | #172 | 1,396 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #172 | 1,380 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 | #173 | 1,365 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #171 | 1,360 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | #172 | 1,376 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #172 | 1,382 |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | #179 | 1,309 |
| 1972 | #3,714 | 16 | #184 | 1,321 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #191 | 1,323 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | #198 | 1,326 |
| 1969 | #4,198 | 12 | #201 | 1,236 |
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | #204 | 1,138 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #197 | 1,174 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #200 | 1,195 |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #212 | 1,149 |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | #208 | 1,348 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #218 | 1,260 |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | #207 | 1,380 |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | #206 | 1,386 |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | #208 | 1,357 |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | #209 | 1,359 |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #202 | 1,372 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #197 | 1,380 |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | #199 | 1,371 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #199 | 1,293 |
| 1954 | #2,779 | 16 | #198 | 1,259 |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | #202 | 1,200 |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | #201 | 1,095 |
| 1951 | #3,482 | 10 | #200 | 1,040 |
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 | #200 | 1,026 |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #203 | 998 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #209 | 908 |
| 1947 | — | #238 | 738 | |
| 1946 | #4,417 | 6 | #241 | 647 |
| 1945 | — | #238 | 560 | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | #262 | 507 |
| 1943 | — | #260 | 544 | |
| 1942 | — | #262 | 514 | |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #258 | 460 |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #266 | 443 |
| 1939 | — | #254 | 450 | |
| 1938 | #2,730 | 10 | #259 | 445 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #238 | 489 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #238 | 481 |
| 1935 | — | #240 | 489 | |
| 1934 | — | #255 | 443 | |
| 1933 | #3,406 | 7 | #266 | 398 |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #247 | 469 |
| 1931 | — | #247 | 465 | |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 | #243 | 515 |
| 1929 | — | #253 | 486 | |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #253 | 491 |
| 1927 | — | #264 | 479 | |
| 1926 | — | #270 | 440 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #277 | 427 |
| 1924 | — | #289 | 398 | |
| 1923 | — | #293 | 368 | |
| 1922 | — | #300 | 361 | |
| 1921 | — | #301 | 357 | |
| 1920 | — | #313 | 336 | |
| 1919 | — | #330 | 292 | |
| 1918 | — | #338 | 286 | |
| 1917 | — | #315 | 289 | |
| 1916 | — | #349 | 237 | |
| 1915 | — | #330 | 256 | |
| 1914 | — | #324 | 199 | |
| 1913 | — | #329 | 154 | |
| 1912 | — | #321 | 134 | |
| 1911 | — | #357 | 59 | |
| 1910 | — | #267 | 83 | |
| 1909 | — | #264 | 71 | |
| 1908 | — | #278 | 60 | |
| 1907 | — | #266 | 62 | |
| 1906 | — | #273 | 52 | |
| 1905 | — | #314 | 41 | |
| 1904 | — | #322 | 38 | |
| 1903 | — | #257 | 50 | |
| 1902 | — | #282 | 45 | |
| 1901 | — | #294 | 35 | |
| 1900 | — | #292 | 50 | |
| 1899 | — | #311 | 32 | |
| 1898 | — | #266 | 45 | |
| 1897 | — | #279 | 42 | |
| 1896 | — | #259 | 49 | |
| 1895 | — | #295 | 37 | |
| 1894 | — | #306 | 33 | |
| 1893 | — | #273 | 41 | |
| 1892 | — | #270 | 44 | |
| 1891 | — | #340 | 25 | |
| 1890 | — | #351 | 25 | |
| 1889 | — | #294 | 33 | |
| 1888 | — | #404 | 21 | |
| 1887 | — | #276 | 34 | |
| 1886 | — | #267 | 40 | |
| 1885 | — | #318 | 28 | |
| 1884 | — | #331 | 28 | |
| 1883 | — | #298 | 30 | |
| 1882 | — | #294 | 34 | |
| 1881 | — | #360 | 21 | |
| 1880 | — | #305 | 30 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ruben was already there! It came in at #305, and was given to 30 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 31 boys a year got the name.
Where Ruben is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#122 · 1 in 499
- California#132 · 1 in 565
- New Mexico#135 · 1 in 496
- Nevada#146 · 1 in 564
- Arizona#163 · 1 in 624
Best ever in a state: #30 in Arizona, 1930.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #122 | 363 | 1 in 499 |
| California | #132 | 450 | 1 in 565 |
| New Mexico | #135 | 22 | 1 in 496 |
| Nevada | #146 | 26 | 1 in 564 |
| Arizona | #163 | 68 | 1 in 624 |
| District of Columbia | #217 | 5 | 1 in 877 |
| Colorado | #222 | 32 | 1 in 937 |
| Illinois | #247 | 60 | 1 in 1,286 |
| Oregon | #247 | 18 | 1 in 1,080 |
| Utah | #264 | 17 | 1 in 1,317 |
| Oklahoma | #273 | 16 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Florida | #275 | 63 | 1 in 1,571 |
| Kansas | #300 | 11 | 1 in 1,493 |
| Washington | #307 | 22 | 1 in 1,578 |
| New York | #330 | 51 | 1 in 2,123 |
| Georgia | #345 | 31 | 1 in 1,926 |
| Idaho | #348 | 5 | 1 in 1,720 |
| Arkansas | #350 | 8 | 1 in 1,883 |
| Indiana | #350 | 17 | 1 in 2,250 |
| Massachusetts | #353 | 12 | 1 in 2,738 |
| Virginia | #358 | 18 | 1 in 2,393 |
| Kentucky | #378 | 9 | 1 in 2,607 |
| Connecticut | #420 | 5 | 1 in 3,356 |
| North Carolina | #437 | 18 | 1 in 2,906 |
| Wisconsin | #460 | 9 | 1 in 3,257 |
| New Jersey | #462 | 13 | 1 in 3,610 |
| Mississippi | #515 | 5 | 1 in 2,950 |
| Tennessee | #516 | 10 | 1 in 3,684 |
| Alabama | #517 | 7 | 1 in 3,388 |
| Minnesota | #522 | 7 | 1 in 4,281 |
| Ohio | #546 | 14 | 1 in 4,680 |
| Michigan | #598 | 11 | 1 in 4,976 |
| Maryland | #604 | 6 | 1 in 4,797 |
| Pennsylvania | #618 | 11 | 1 in 5,799 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ruben
- 24 spots since 2024 (#504 → #480)
- 15 spots since 2020 (#465 → #480)
- 106 spots since 2015 (#374 → #480)
- Biggest jump: 110 spots in 1889 (#404 → #294)
- Biggest drop: 128 spots in 1888 (#276 → #404)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1980 at #165 (1,487 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 39 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,107 boys born in 1992 were named Ruben (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,703 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #165 in 1980, was only 1 in 1,200 (0.08%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 14.5% of all boys named Ruben (16,930) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 299 | #267 (1886) | #315 |
| 1890s | 373 | #259 (1896) | #295 |
| 1900s | 504 | #257 (1903) | #284 |
| 1910s | 1,989 | #267 (1910) | #326 |
| 1920s | 4,143 | #253 (1928) | #281 |
| 1930s | 4,644 | #238 (1937) | #249 |
| 1940s | 6,319 | #203 (1949) | #244 |
| 1950s | 12,395 | #197 (1957) | #201 |
| 1960s | 12,623 | #197 (1967) | #206 |
| 1970s | 13,538 | #171 (1976) | #178 |
| 1980s | 14,858 | #165 (1980) | #178 |
| 1990s | 16,930 | #178 (1992) | #189 |
| 2000s | 15,379 | #206 (2000) | #231 |
| 2010s | 8,730 | #297 (2010) | #368 |
| 2020s | 3,828 | #458 (2022) | #475 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ruben in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 369,568 of them was named Ruben, which outranked 14.3% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 1,362 of them was named Ruben, which outranked 98.2% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.