Ruby

#64 for girls in 2025, 3,554 births · #5,861 for boys in 2025, 15 births
Given to girls 99.2% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1911 · 3,372 births
Debut · girls
92 births
In top 100 · girls
71 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
376,570
since 1880

Ruby over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201940peak #22, 1911girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#643,554#5,86115
2024#623,533#5,24118
2023#653,364#6,51713
2022#623,621#5,01919
2021#623,599#6,03214
2020#743,342#7,50210
2019#663,738#8,8898
2018#743,591#10,7606
2017#793,587#10,7756
2016#713,847#8,8168
2015#833,467—
2014#903,430—
2013#933,321#7,53710
2012#1052,918#9,7097
2011#1092,770#10,8086
2010#1132,798#12,2315
2009#1083,019#12,4915
2008#1133,021#12,5535
2007#1162,900#8,9158
2006#1372,582#6,90411
2005#1302,472—
2004#1582,120—
2003#1891,707#6,25811
2002#2071,579—
2001#2321,366#8,3397
2000#2581,266#8,2097
1999#2611,209#8,7046
1998#2561,207#5,46611
1997#2801,040#9,2655
1996#295985#5,53510
1995#2601,053#4,50813
1994#2711,031#4,09415
1993#2661,034#2,94323
1992#2721,039#3,74816
1991#2771,004#3,46217
1990#291954#2,95221
1989#329765#2,69023
1988#383621#2,68221
1987#369631#3,95911
1986#401558#4,4579
1985#384593#3,59912
1984#380595#3,10714
1983#377591#3,41112
1982#371622#3,10814
1981#346677#3,41212
1980#357659#3,61511
1979#350661#4,4038
1978#347628#4,1578
1977#362601#5,1236
1976#348616#4,0128
1975#346628#3,42810
1974#358601#4,6346
1973#345635#3,22310
1972#348638#3,3449
1971#346731#2,81312
1970#358694#3,2829
1969#343680#3,5957
1968#352639#2,57611
1967#317746#2,47011
1966#311807#2,21613
1965#276984#2,36612
1964#2691,113#2,20514
1963#2361,383#2,53911
1962#2631,148#2,67310
1961#2451,278#2,9009
1960#2291,386#2,12115
1959#2151,502#3,0378
1958#2021,639#2,64210
1957#1971,783#3,9935
1956#1791,992#1,67622
1955#1732,009#2,21913
1954#1622,143#1,82618
1953#1502,342#1,70920
1952#1452,375#1,70120
1951#1402,351#1,90416
1950#1302,414#1,61521
1949#1232,577#1,54423
1948#1142,894#2,11513
1947#1123,069#1,55523
1946#1053,050#1,21733
1945#952,904#1,40622
1944#873,189#1,28227
1943#823,470#1,30828
1942#773,519#1,31628
1941#693,581#1,33325
1940#663,619#93946
1939#673,712#1,16831
1938#613,942#89749
1937#524,289#83553
1936#514,226#88248
1935#414,764#82257
1934#394,978#86053
1933#434,944#84354
1932#385,469#87453
1931#395,331#78763
1930#365,993#82462
1929#366,153#80664
1928#346,692#91354
1927#307,264#72281
1926#307,476#87558
1925#307,843#82265
1924#268,406#83866
1923#258,232#88259
1922#268,003#94155
1921#268,333#78074
1920#268,336#75476
1919#248,334#89056
1918#278,134#71079
1917#277,662#89251
1916#237,686#76364
1915#247,237#79158
1914#245,625#80243
1913#234,913#62950
1912#234,452#56151
1911#223,372#56229
1910#272,893#59823
1909#272,524#71415
1908#332,229#9469
1907#342,113#48623
1906#361,962#42427
1905#381,885#61515
1904#401,701#46621
1903#421,538#48719
1902#471,458#58314
1901#491,225#55913
1900#511,540#49022
1899#521,103#61311
1898#581,191#54315
1897#571,025#65211
1896#66994#48118
1895#66954#45619
1894#67874#56713
1893#71769#7059
1892#74695#7928
1891#80554#56411
1890#81540#9945
1889#78522#9745
1888#94445#58012
1887#105309#6319
1886#106301#9595
1885#106272#9365
1884#108244—
1883#126163—
1882#131136—
1881#133119—
1880#14992#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Ruby was already there! It came in at #149, and was given to 92 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 140 girls a year got the name.

Where Ruby is popular in 1940

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedAKMaine: #145 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 769 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedNHWashington: #152 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 771 girlsWAIdaho: #133 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 610 girlsIDMontana: #116 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 428 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #112 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 443 girlsNDMinnesota: #151 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 987 girlsMNIllinois: #141 for girls · 67 births · 1 in 840 girlsILWisconsin: #174 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,512 girlsWIMichigan: #161 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 1,182 girlsMINew York: #211 for girls · 55 births · 1 in 1,631 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedRIOregon: #131 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 649 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedNVWyoming: #71 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 237 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #104 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 472 girlsSDIowa: #118 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 730 girlsIAIndiana: #107 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 597 girlsINOhio: #138 for girls · 65 births · 1 in 811 girlsOHPennsylvania: #198 for girls · 51 births · 1 in 1,471 girlsPANew Jersey: #271 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,871 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #157 for girls · 65 births · 1 in 768 girlsCAUtah: #195 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,001 girlsUTColorado: #76 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 313 girlsCONebraska: #111 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 544 girlsNEMissouri: #54 for girls · 123 births · 1 in 227 girlsMOKentucky: #32 for girls · 205 births · 1 in 140 girlsKYWest Virginia: #55 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 246 girlsWVVirginia: #40 for girls · 140 births · 1 in 177 girlsVAMaryland: #98 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 448 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Ruby, so not publishedDEArizona: #102 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 373 girlsAZNew Mexico: #67 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 245 girlsNMKansas: #87 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 424 girlsKSArkansas: #16 for girls · 207 births · 1 in 92 girlsARTennessee: #25 for girls · 223 births · 1 in 126 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #24 for girls · 302 births · 1 in 125 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #22 for girls · 178 births · 1 in 123 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #142 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 766 girlsDCOklahoma: #37 for girls · 121 births · 1 in 167 girlsOKLouisiana: #37 for girls · 129 births · 1 in 181 girlsLAMississippi: #9 for girls · 238 births · 1 in 95 girlsMSAlabama: #20 for girls · 265 births · 1 in 111 girlsALGeorgia: #24 for girls · 257 births · 1 in 124 girlsGAHawaii: #79 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 260 girlsHITexas: #30 for girls · 344 births · 1 in 175 girlsTXFlorida: #31 for girls · 84 births · 1 in 176 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#9 · 1 in 95
  2. Arkansas#16 · 1 in 92
  3. Alabama#20 · 1 in 111
  4. South Carolina#22 · 1 in 123
  5. Georgia#24 · 1 in 124

Best ever in a state: #2 in Arkansas, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#92381 in 95
Arkansas#162071 in 92
Alabama#202651 in 111
South Carolina#221781 in 123
Georgia#242571 in 124
North Carolina#243021 in 125
Tennessee#252231 in 126
Texas#303441 in 175
Florida#31841 in 176
Kentucky#322051 in 140
Louisiana#371291 in 181
Oklahoma#371211 in 167
Virginia#401401 in 177
Missouri#541231 in 227
West Virginia#55771 in 246
New Mexico#67241 in 245
Wyoming#7171 in 237
Colorado#76291 in 313
Hawaii#79131 in 260
Kansas#87291 in 424
Maryland#98291 in 448
Arizona#102131 in 373
South Dakota#104101 in 472
Indiana#107451 in 597
Nebraska#111171 in 544
North Dakota#112121 in 443
Montana#116101 in 428
Iowa#118271 in 730
Oregon#131111 in 649
Idaho#13371 in 610
Ohio#138651 in 811
Illinois#141671 in 840
District of Columbia#14281 in 766
Maine#14581 in 769
Minnesota#151231 in 987
Washington#152151 in 771
California#157651 in 768
Michigan#161371 in 1,182
Wisconsin#174161 in 1,512
Utah#19551 in 1,001
Pennsylvania#198511 in 1,471
New York#211551 in 1,631
New Jersey#27191 in 2,871
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Massachusetts———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
Rhode Island———
Vermont———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Ruby
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 2 spots since 2024 (#62 → #64)
  • 10 spots since 2020 (#74 → #64)
  • 19 spots since 2015 (#83 → #64)
  • Biggest jump: 54 spots in 1989 (#383 → #329)
  • Biggest drop: 35 spots in 1966 (#276 → #311)
Rise & fade · girls
31 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1911 at #22 (3,372 births)
  • Births halved by 1958, 47 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 71 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 71 yrs · run 1888–1945
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 124
  • Highest: 1 in 124 girls born in 1911 were named Ruby (0.81%)
  • Latest: 1 in 452 girls born in 2025 (0.22%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 20.4% of all girls named Ruby (76,738) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #22 (1911) → #401 (1986) → #62 (2022)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,603#78 (1889)#114
1890s8,699#52 (1899)#67
1900s18,175#27 (1909)#40
1910s60,308#22 (1911)#24
1920s76,738#25 (1923)#29
1930s47,648#36 (1930)#47
1940s31,872#66 (1940)#93
1950s20,550#130 (1950)#169
1960s10,164#229 (1960)#284
1970s6,433#345 (1973)#351
1980s6,312#329 (1989)#370
1990s10,556#256 (1998)#273
2000s22,032#108 (2009)#165
2010s33,467#66 (2019)#88
2020s21,013#62 (2022)#65

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Ruby in 1940

girls
#66
3,619 births · 1 in 316 girls
boys
#939
46 births · 1 in 25,199 boys

Top girls' names in 1940

  1. #1Mary56,216
  2. #2Barbara36,736
  3. #3Patricia32,665
  4. #4Judith22,385
  5. #5Betty22,077
  6. #6Carol21,759
  7. #7Nancy19,737
  8. #8Linda18,370
  9. #9Shirley17,881
  10. #10Sandra16,153
  11. #66Ruby3,619

Top boys' names in 1940

  1. #1James62,481
  2. #2Robert61,198
  3. #3John54,786
  4. #4William44,779
  5. #5Richard37,425
  6. #6Charles31,689
  7. #7David27,690
  8. #8Thomas23,991
  9. #9Donald23,115
  10. #10Ronald20,741
  11. #939Ruby46
More about 1940

girls

1,143,528 girls got a published name in 1940; 1 in 316 of them was named Ruby, which outranked 98.7% of the 5,028 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ruby
  1. #63Joann3,789
  2. #64Marjorie3,681
  3. #65Gail3,621
  4. #66Ruby3,619
  5. #67Dolores3,604
  6. #68Eleanor3,584
  7. #69Loretta3,502
Biggest movers since 1939
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,494Scarlett#3,429 → #935
  2. ↑ 1,465Lonna#2,206 → #741
  3. ↑ 834Pam#1,797 → #963
  4. ↑ 659Jody#1,638 → #979
  5. ↑ 633Laraine#1,474 → #841
Fallers
  1. ↓ 481Fredia#996 → #1,477
  2. ↓ 430Eleanora#974 → #1,404
  3. ↓ 375Danielle#811 → #1,186
  4. ↓ 342Eloisa#930 → #1,272
  5. ↓ 298Coral#996 → #1,294

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,159,172 boys got a published name in 1940; 1 in 25,199 of them was named Ruby, which outranked 76.1% of the 3,937 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ruby
  1. #929Lenord47
  2. #929Orin47
  3. #929Von47
  4. #939Ruby46
  5. #939Allyn46
  6. #939Author46
  7. #939Barrie46
  8. #952Cedric45
  9. #952Clem45
  10. #952Del45

Tied with 12 names at #939; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1939
Risers
  1. ↑ 565Whitney#1,458 → #893
  2. ↑ 447Gonzalo#1,297 → #850
  3. ↑ 419Weston#1,323 → #904
  4. ↑ 368Ashley#1,272 → #904
  5. ↑ 366Agustin#1,238 → #872
Fallers
  1. ↓ 886Montie#916 → #1,802
  2. ↓ 446Verlon#888 → #1,334
  3. ↓ 394Issac#857 → #1,251
  4. ↓ 392Otho#942 → #1,334
  5. ↓ 384Pearl#867 → #1,251

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1940 →