Rudolph

Last seen for girls in 1974 at #7,680 · #4,139 for boys in 2025, 25 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1927 · 1,690 births
Debut · boys
54 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
53,441
since 1880

Rudolph over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Rudolph has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201975peak #110, 1927boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#4,13925
2024—#3,39434
2023—#4,61022
2022—#3,69130
2021—#3,58231
2020—#3,73428
2019—#2,94341
2018—#3,30134
2017—#2,95140
2016—#3,29334
2015—#2,86441
2014—#2,58247
2013—#3,06036
2012—#2,77243
2011—#2,69944
2010—#3,37732
2009—#3,22335
2008—#2,37454
2007—#2,68445
2006—#2,44950
2005—#2,11458
2004—#2,02459
2003—#1,81565
2002—#1,69469
2001—#1,48182
2000—#1,62972
1999—#1,67163
1998—#1,29792
1997—#1,42376
1996—#1,101109
1995—#1,107105
1994—#1,096105
1993—#1,071108
1992—#987119
1991—#920131
1990—#845146
1989—#729183
1988—#721170
1987—#730156
1986—#770139
1985—#702157
1984—#676165
1983—#647175
1982—#625192
1981—#658170
1980—#623196
1979—#623189
1978—#617182
1977—#623181
1976—#577198
1975—#588188
1974#7,6806#543218
1973#8,4235#536215
1972—#516231
1971—#484275
1970—#462309
1969—#485250
1968—#462271
1967—#452276
1966—#401352
1965—#425328
1964—#414378
1963—#393412
1962—#399412
1961—#392414
1960—#376442
1959—#366458
1958—#346489
1957—#319572
1956—#274718
1955#4,7407#281653
1954—#276653
1953—#252745
1952—#240777
1951#5,4145#228831
1950—#239756
1949—#223822
1948—#241716
1947—#249696
1946#4,4176#246628
1945#4,5565#235574
1944#4,5745#235573
1943—#221664
1942—#222658
1941—#220600
1940#4,3495#206622
1939—#208587
1938—#192684
1937—#197630
1936—#192647
1935—#181745
1934#3,1598#175779
1933#3,7536#167847
1932#4,4115#158960
1931#2,30713#1461,102
1930#2,20215#1401,219
1929#2,92110#1401,220
1928#2,09417#1341,308
1927#3,05310#1101,690
1926#3,8737#1111,636
1925#2,77812#1361,240
1924#3,3939#1381,229
1923—#1281,303
1922—#1381,145
1921#4,0237#157960
1920#4,9755#169830
1919—#170802
1918#3,02410#149962
1917#4,0836#141946
1916—#137988
1915#3,7956#135974
1914#2,8767#139732
1913—#138565
1912—#141453
1911—#155217
1910—#146218
1909—#148173
1908—#140173
1907—#162135
1906—#156125
1905—#155132
1904—#149128
1903—#153120
1902—#151119
1901—#17087
1900—#145147
1899—#153100
1898—#147115
1897—#147109
1896—#154108
1895—#145106
1894—#147104
1893—#149101
1892—#16695
1891—#18668
1890—#15492
1889—#16083
1888—#23754
1887—#17771
1886—#19868
1885—#18770
1884—#18177
1883—#19361
1882—#22852
1881—#18662
1880—#21654
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Rudolph was already there! It came in at #216, and was given to 54 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 2020–2023, when fewer than 32 boys a year got the name.

Where Rudolph is popular in 1975

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMNIllinois: #452 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 4,891 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedWIMichigan: #657 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 12,373 boysMINew York: #461 for boys · 21 births · 1 in 5,362 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedINOhio: #611 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 12,764 boysOHPennsylvania: #431 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 7,173 boysPANew Jersey: #511 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,882 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #461 for boys · 30 births · 1 in 5,069 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedWVVirginia: #416 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 5,140 boysVAMaryland: #282 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,958 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedDEArizona: #403 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 3,493 boysAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #423 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,568 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Rudolph, so not publishedHITexas: #591 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 6,692 boysTXFlorida: #536 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 5,995 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Maryland#282 · 1 in 2,958
  2. Arizona#403 · 1 in 3,493
  3. Virginia#416 · 1 in 5,140
  4. North Carolina#423 · 1 in 4,568
  5. Pennsylvania#431 · 1 in 7,173

Best ever in a state: #32 in Wyoming, 1913.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maryland#28271 in 2,958
Arizona#40351 in 3,493
Virginia#41661 in 5,140
North Carolina#42381 in 4,568
Pennsylvania#431101 in 7,173
Illinois#452161 in 4,891
California#461301 in 5,069
New York#461211 in 5,362
New Jersey#51161 in 6,882
Florida#53681 in 5,995
Texas#591161 in 6,692
Ohio#61161 in 12,764
Michigan#65751 in 12,373
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rudolph
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 745 spots since 2024 (#3,394 → #4,139)
  • 405 spots since 2020 (#3,734 → #4,139)
  • 1,275 spots since 2015 (#2,864 → #4,139)
  • Biggest jump: 77 spots in 1889 (#237 → #160)
  • Biggest drop: 116 spots in 1990 (#729 → #845)
Rise & fade · boys
47 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1927 at #110 (1,690 births)
  • Births halved by 1934, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 113 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 113 yrs · run 1880–1992
Share of babies · boys
1 in 667
  • Highest: 1 in 667 boys born in 1927 were named Rudolph (0.15%)
  • Latest: 1 in 68,323 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 23.5% of all boys named Rudolph (12,561) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s652#160 (1889)#196
1890s998#145 (1895)#155
1900s1,339#140 (1908)#153
1910s6,857#135 (1915)#145
1920s12,561#110 (1927)#136
1930s8,200#140 (1930)#176
1940s6,553#206 (1940)#230
1950s6,652#228 (1951)#282
1960s3,535#376 (1960)#420
1970s2,186#462 (1970)#557
1980s1,703#623 (1980)#688
1990s1,054#845 (1990)#1,152
2000s589#1,481 (2001)#2,149
2010s392#2,582 (2014)#2,984
2020s170#3,394 (2024)#3,858

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rudolph in 1975

boys
#588
188 births · 1 in 8,305 boys

Top boys' names in 1975

  1. #1Michael68,418
  2. #2Jason52,159
  3. #3Christopher46,575
  4. #4James39,569
  5. #5David39,156
  6. #6Robert35,306
  7. #7John35,079
  8. #8Brian30,578
  9. #9Matthew28,527
  10. #10William25,561
  11. #588Rudolph188
More about 1975

boys

1,561,357 boys got a published name in 1975; 1 in 8,305 of them was named Rudolph, which outranked 90.7% of the 6,337 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 25.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rudolph
  1. #585Quinton190
  2. #585Santos190
  3. #587Ignacio189
  4. #588Rudolph188
  5. #588Wilfredo188
  6. #590Elmer187
  7. #591Dave186
  8. #591Zachariah186

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1974
Risers
  1. ↑ 722Benjiman#1,692 → #970
  2. ↑ 702Marques#1,520 → #818
  3. ↑ 645Glendon#1,409 → #764
  4. ↑ 502Benji#1,124 → #622
  5. ↑ 471Regan#1,409 → #938
Fallers
  1. ↓ 905Toma#882 → #1,787
  2. ↓ 830Vashon#923 → #1,753
  3. ↓ 352Bruno#993 → #1,345
  4. ↓ 327Hollis#953 → #1,280
  5. ↓ 303Domenico#977 → #1,280

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1975 →