Rupert

Last seen for girls in 1930 at #4,047 · #3,757 for boys in 2025, 29 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1899 · 21 births
Debut · boys
6 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
5,595
since 1880

Rupert over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Rupert has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201941peak #402, 1899boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#3,75729
2024—#3,79329
2023—#4,11226
2022—#5,21518
2021—#4,01126
2020—#4,14124
2019—#4,48022
2018—#6,34513
2017—#3,88927
2016—#5,78915
2015—#4,40722
2014—#5,48516
2013—#6,24113
2012—#6,30613
2011—#8,7678
2010—#5,74115
2009—#8,9858
2008—#6,76312
2007—#7,09411
2006—#8,7328
2005—#5,57814
2004—#6,13812
2003—#6,71510
2002—#5,13114
2001—#8,3397
2000—#5,29713
1999—#5,31712
1998—#5,15912
1997—#4,96012
1996—#4,18515
1995—#5,12411
1994—#6,3728
1993—#5,36010
1992—#3,33819
1991—#2,54427
1990—#4,67311
1989—#2,69023
1988—#4,45010
1987—#2,46822
1986—#2,77918
1985—#3,40113
1984—#3,10714
1983—#2,08525
1982—#2,20723
1981—#2,33821
1980—#3,09814
1979—#2,56818
1978—#3,61410
1977—#2,20221
1976—#1,93225
1975—#1,88425
1974—#2,05021
1973—#1,87123
1972—#1,64828
1971—#1,82324
1970—#1,84723
1969—#1,60526
1968—#1,78820
1967—#1,38830
1966—#1,68421
1965—#1,20640
1964—#1,37133
1963—#1,19542
1962—#1,18743
1961—#1,25040
1960—#1,08351
1959—#1,33734
1958—#1,37032
1957—#1,09049
1956—#1,28536
1955—#1,02254
1954—#1,20039
1953—#1,12343
1952—#89662
1951—#90261
1950—#93454
1949—#94653
1948—#81370
1947—#1,00051
1946—#1,01945
1945—#78262
1944—#91848
1943—#80866
1942—#83960
1941—#83458
1940—#84156
1939—#83653
1938—#78461
1937—#83054
1936—#60193
1935—#68877
1934—#74268
1933—#71072
1932—#67482
1931—#61693
1930#4,0476#69979
1929—#66386
1928—#61798
1927—#610104
1926—#63199
1925—#559122
1924—#613108
1923—#511141
1922#5,0095#546132
1921—#528139
1920#4,9755#487156
1919—#562113
1918—#510138
1917—#540117
1916—#552107
1915—#515117
1914—#51291
1913—#53166
1912—#47069
1911—#54830
1910—#48033
1909—#57421
1908—#63217
1907—#51121
1906—#48921
1905—#50720
1904—#48220
1903—#65612
1902—#7949
1901—#55913
1900—#43027
1899—#40221
1898—#41822
1897—#47317
1896—#43820
1895—#52915
1894—#43919
1893—#47915
1892—#49716
1891—#8416
1890—#45816
1889—#58111
1888—#60911
1887—#51612
1886—#57811
1885—#57711
1884—#48815
1883—#6449
1882—#57611
1881—#56310
1880—#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Rupert was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.

Where Rupert is popular in 1941

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #434 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,450 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Rupert, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. North Carolina#434 · 1 in 6,450

Best ever in a state: #185 in North Carolina, 1920.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Carolina#43461 in 6,450
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rupert
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 36 spots since 2024 (#3,793 → #3,757)
  • 384 spots since 2020 (#4,141 → #3,757)
  • 650 spots since 2015 (#4,407 → #3,757)
  • Biggest jump: 344 spots in 1892 (#841 → #497)
  • Biggest drop: 383 spots in 1891 (#458 → #841)
Rise & fade · boys
19 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1899 at #402 (21 births)
  • Births halved by 1902, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 72 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 72 yrs · run 1880–1945
Share of babies · boys
1 in 5,058
  • Highest: 1 in 5,058 boys born in 1899 were named Rupert (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 58,899 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 21.2% of all boys named Rupert (1,185) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s107#488 (1884)#594
1890s167#402 (1899)#497
1900s181#430 (1900)#563
1910s881#470 (1912)#522
1920s1,185#487 (1920)#577
1930s732#601 (1936)#718
1940s569#782 (1945)#880
1950s464#896 (1952)#1,116
1960s346#1,083 (1960)#1,376
1970s218#1,648 (1972)#2,144
1980s183#2,085 (1983)#2,862
1990s137#2,544 (1991)#4,703
2000s109#5,131 (2002)#6,877
2010s164#3,889 (2017)#5,745
2020s152#3,757 (2025)#4,172

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rupert in 1941

boys
#834
58 births · 1 in 21,178 boys

Top boys' names in 1941

  1. #1James66,751
  2. #2Robert64,247
  3. #3John57,520
  4. #4William47,798
  5. #5Richard39,112
  6. #6Charles32,742
  7. #7David30,553
  8. #8Thomas26,641
  9. #9Ronald24,407
  10. #10Donald22,641
  11. #834Rupert58
More about 1941

boys

1,228,318 boys got a published name in 1941; 1 in 21,178 of them was named Rupert, which outranked 79.2% of the 4,002 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rupert
  1. #828Marcel59
  2. #828Quentin59
  3. #828Willam59
  4. #834Rupert58
  5. #834Arvin58
  6. #834Farrell58
  7. #834Marty58
  8. #839Artis57
  9. #839Cruz57
  10. #839Curt57

Tied with 4 names at #834; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1940
Risers
  1. ↑ 586Gay#1,573 → #987
  2. ↑ 375Issac#1,251 → #876
  3. ↑ 363Otho#1,334 → #971
  4. ↑ 338Lawrance#1,208 → #870
  5. ↑ 313Ford#1,251 → #938
Fallers
  1. ↓ 508Wilkie#792 → #1,300
  2. ↓ 452Arlis#994 → #1,446
  3. ↓ 394Ruby#939 → #1,333
  4. ↓ 359Gonzalo#850 → #1,209
  5. ↓ 325Lenord#929 → #1,254

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1941 →