Rusty
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #11,122 · #2,363 for boys in 2025, 58 births
Given to boys 96.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1961 · 576 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 17,802since 1927
Rusty over time
Rank among boys' names. Rusty has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,363 | 58 | |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #3,335 | 35 |
| 2023 | — | #3,177 | 38 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,412 | 34 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,862 | 43 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,811 | 27 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,899 | 27 | |
| 2018 | — | #3,793 | 28 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,440 | 32 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,935 | 40 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,641 | 46 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,754 | 43 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,122 | 35 | |
| 2012 | — | #3,002 | 38 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,748 | 43 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,682 | 45 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,476 | 31 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,788 | 43 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,372 | 54 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,784 | 41 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,711 | 78 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,880 | 65 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,646 | 76 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,723 | 67 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,659 | 70 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,609 | 73 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,408 | 83 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,359 | 86 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,182 | 101 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #1,042 | 117 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #983 | 127 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #857 | 157 |
| 1993 | — | #864 | 150 | |
| 1992 | — | #814 | 165 | |
| 1991 | — | #692 | 213 | |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #608 | 273 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #561 | 298 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #494 | 342 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #480 | 342 |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | #474 | 336 |
| 1985 | — | #478 | 327 | |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #456 | 338 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #431 | 362 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #404 | 420 |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | #353 | 498 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | #355 | 505 |
| 1979 | #2,931 | 29 | #347 | 520 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #432 | 341 |
| 1977 | #3,612 | 20 | #428 | 342 |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 | #399 | 377 |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | #403 | 365 |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | #450 | 312 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #430 | 327 |
| 1972 | #3,177 | 20 | #440 | 324 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #431 | 355 |
| 1970 | #2,938 | 23 | #415 | 384 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #429 | 340 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #427 | 328 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #432 | 309 |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 | #416 | 331 |
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 | #382 | 411 |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | #387 | 419 |
| 1963 | #3,176 | 16 | #350 | 498 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #343 | 516 |
| 1961 | — | #328 | 576 | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #343 | 514 |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | #328 | 558 |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | #339 | 509 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | #362 | 443 |
| 1956 | #3,186 | 14 | #354 | 434 |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #407 | 323 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #502 | 208 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #593 | 147 |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | #638 | 121 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #656 | 115 |
| 1950 | — | #691 | 98 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #722 | 90 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #795 | 73 |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | #815 | 72 |
| 1946 | — | #738 | 79 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,016 | 39 | |
| 1944 | — | #991 | 43 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,577 | 20 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,730 | 17 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,083 | 12 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,983 | 13 | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #2,829 | 7 |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,479 | 9 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | #3,592 | 6 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | #3,151 | 8 | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rusty! It came in at #3,151, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1928–1929, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Rusty is popular in 1950
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Indiana#359 · 1 in 7,488
- Ohio#519 · 1 in 18,161
- California#566 · 1 in 13,559
- Texas#589 · 1 in 7,987
Best ever in a state: #95 in Wyoming, 1968.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #359 | 6 | 1 in 7,488 |
| Ohio | #519 | 5 | 1 in 18,161 |
| California | #566 | 9 | 1 in 13,559 |
| Texas | #589 | 13 | 1 in 7,987 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rusty
- 972 spots since 2024 (#3,335 → #2,363)
- 1,448 spots since 2020 (#3,811 → #2,363)
- 278 spots since 2015 (#2,641 → #2,363)
- Biggest jump: 586 spots in 1944 (#1,577 → #991)
- Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1995 (#857 → #983)
- Debuted 1927
- Peaked 1961 at #328 (576 births)
- Births halved by 1990, 29 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 51 yrs · run 1946–1995
- Highest: 1 in 3,311 boys born in 1979 were named Rusty (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 29,450 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #328 in 1961, was only 1 in 3,688 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.8% of all boys named Rusty (4,242) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 8 | #3,151 (1927) | #3,151 |
| 1930s | 41 | #2,479 (1937) | #3,079 |
| 1940s | 458 | #722 (1949) | #1,245 |
| 1950s | 2,956 | #328 (1959) | #487 |
| 1960s | 4,242 | #328 (1961) | #384 |
| 1970s | 3,647 | #347 (1979) | #418 |
| 1980s | 3,768 | #353 (1981) | #449 |
| 1990s | 1,472 | #608 (1990) | #981 |
| 2000s | 598 | #1,609 (2000) | #2,165 |
| 2010s | 377 | #2,641 (2015) | #3,102 |
| 2020s | 235 | #2,363 (2025) | #3,160 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rusty in 1950
Top boys' names in 1950
More about 1950
boys
1,790,262 boys got a published name in 1950; 1 in 18,268 of them was named Rusty, which outranked 83.5% of the 4,196 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).