Rusty
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #11,122 · #2,363 for boys in 2025, 58 births
Given to boys 96.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1961 · 576 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 17,802since 1927
Rusty over time
Rank among boys' names. Rusty has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,363 | 58 | |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #3,335 | 35 |
| 2023 | — | #3,177 | 38 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,412 | 34 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,862 | 43 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,811 | 27 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,899 | 27 | |
| 2018 | — | #3,793 | 28 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,440 | 32 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,935 | 40 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,641 | 46 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,754 | 43 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,122 | 35 | |
| 2012 | — | #3,002 | 38 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,748 | 43 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,682 | 45 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,476 | 31 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,788 | 43 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,372 | 54 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,784 | 41 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,711 | 78 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,880 | 65 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,646 | 76 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,723 | 67 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,659 | 70 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,609 | 73 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,408 | 83 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,359 | 86 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,182 | 101 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #1,042 | 117 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #983 | 127 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #857 | 157 |
| 1993 | — | #864 | 150 | |
| 1992 | — | #814 | 165 | |
| 1991 | — | #692 | 213 | |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #608 | 273 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #561 | 298 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #494 | 342 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #480 | 342 |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | #474 | 336 |
| 1985 | — | #478 | 327 | |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 | #456 | 338 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #431 | 362 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #404 | 420 |
| 1981 | #4,005 | 19 | #353 | 498 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | #355 | 505 |
| 1979 | #2,931 | 29 | #347 | 520 |
| 1978 | #3,777 | 19 | #432 | 341 |
| 1977 | #3,612 | 20 | #428 | 342 |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 | #399 | 377 |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | #403 | 365 |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | #450 | 312 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #430 | 327 |
| 1972 | #3,177 | 20 | #440 | 324 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #431 | 355 |
| 1970 | #2,938 | 23 | #415 | 384 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #429 | 340 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #427 | 328 |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | #432 | 309 |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 | #416 | 331 |
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 | #382 | 411 |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | #387 | 419 |
| 1963 | #3,176 | 16 | #350 | 498 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #343 | 516 |
| 1961 | — | #328 | 576 | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #343 | 514 |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 | #328 | 558 |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | #339 | 509 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | #362 | 443 |
| 1956 | #3,186 | 14 | #354 | 434 |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #407 | 323 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #502 | 208 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #593 | 147 |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 | #638 | 121 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #656 | 115 |
| 1950 | — | #691 | 98 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #722 | 90 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #795 | 73 |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | #815 | 72 |
| 1946 | — | #738 | 79 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,016 | 39 | |
| 1944 | — | #991 | 43 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,577 | 20 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,730 | 17 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,083 | 12 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,983 | 13 | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #2,829 | 7 |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,479 | 9 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | #3,592 | 6 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | #3,151 | 8 | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Rusty! It came in at #3,151, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1928–1929, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Rusty is popular in 1955
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#196 · 1 in 1,437
- Oregon#241 · 1 in 2,567
- Indiana#247 · 1 in 3,118
- Washington#274 · 1 in 3,456
- Utah#278 · 1 in 2,333
Best ever in a state: #95 in Wyoming, 1968.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #196 | 17 | 1 in 1,437 |
| Oregon | #241 | 7 | 1 in 2,567 |
| Indiana | #247 | 17 | 1 in 3,118 |
| Washington | #274 | 9 | 1 in 3,456 |
| Utah | #278 | 5 | 1 in 2,333 |
| Arkansas | #281 | 8 | 1 in 2,508 |
| Michigan | #305 | 19 | 1 in 5,047 |
| Kansas | #307 | 6 | 1 in 4,026 |
| South Carolina | #308 | 9 | 1 in 3,390 |
| Arizona | #312 | 5 | 1 in 2,695 |
| Colorado | #313 | 5 | 1 in 3,913 |
| Iowa | #324 | 5 | 1 in 6,177 |
| Tennessee | #337 | 9 | 1 in 4,568 |
| Florida | #340 | 11 | 1 in 3,912 |
| Georgia | #346 | 12 | 1 in 4,086 |
| Maryland | #354 | 5 | 1 in 6,101 |
| Ohio | #355 | 16 | 1 in 6,893 |
| Illinois | #366 | 17 | 1 in 6,346 |
| Virginia | #398 | 7 | 1 in 6,200 |
| Pennsylvania | #400 | 11 | 1 in 10,952 |
| California | #401 | 26 | 1 in 6,092 |
| Missouri | #403 | 6 | 1 in 7,842 |
| New Jersey | #414 | 5 | 1 in 11,512 |
| Texas | #422 | 29 | 1 in 4,170 |
| Alabama | #433 | 6 | 1 in 6,481 |
| North Carolina | #498 | 6 | 1 in 9,138 |
| Louisiana | #500 | 6 | 1 in 6,783 |
| New York | #841 | 5 | 1 in 34,850 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Rusty
- 972 spots since 2024 (#3,335 → #2,363)
- 1,448 spots since 2020 (#3,811 → #2,363)
- 278 spots since 2015 (#2,641 → #2,363)
- Biggest jump: 586 spots in 1944 (#1,577 → #991)
- Biggest drop: 126 spots in 1995 (#857 → #983)
- Debuted 1927
- Peaked 1961 at #328 (576 births)
- Births halved by 1990, 29 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 51 yrs · run 1946–1995
- Highest: 1 in 3,311 boys born in 1979 were named Rusty (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 29,450 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #328 in 1961, was only 1 in 3,688 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 23.8% of all boys named Rusty (4,242) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 8 | #3,151 (1927) | #3,151 |
| 1930s | 41 | #2,479 (1937) | #3,079 |
| 1940s | 458 | #722 (1949) | #1,245 |
| 1950s | 2,956 | #328 (1959) | #487 |
| 1960s | 4,242 | #328 (1961) | #384 |
| 1970s | 3,647 | #347 (1979) | #418 |
| 1980s | 3,768 | #353 (1981) | #449 |
| 1990s | 1,472 | #608 (1990) | #981 |
| 2000s | 598 | #1,609 (2000) | #2,165 |
| 2010s | 377 | #2,641 (2015) | #3,102 |
| 2020s | 235 | #2,363 (2025) | #3,160 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Rusty in 1955
Top girls' names in 1955
Top boys' names in 1955
More about 1955
girls
1,955,277 girls got a published name in 1955; 1 in 162,940 of them was named Rusty, which outranked 49.8% of the 6,732 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,225Wanetta13
- #3,225Wendee13
- #3,225Zonia13
- #3,377Rusty12
- #3,377Ailene12
- #3,377Albertina12
- #3,377Alfrieda12
- #3,571Aaron11
- #3,571Acquanetta11
- #3,571Aggie11
Tied with 193 names at #3,377; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,059,889 boys got a published name in 1955; 1 in 6,377 of them was named Rusty, which outranked 90.8% of the 4,400 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).