Ruth
#173 for girls in 2025, 1,781 births · Last seen for boys in 2008 at #12,553
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1893 · 3,658 births
- Debut · girls
- 234 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 82 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 836,122since 1880
Ruth over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #173 | 1,781 | — | |
| 2024 | #171 | 1,787 | — | |
| 2023 | #187 | 1,604 | — | |
| 2022 | #179 | 1,668 | — | |
| 2021 | #187 | 1,579 | — | |
| 2020 | #219 | 1,327 | — | |
| 2019 | #231 | 1,351 | — | |
| 2018 | #261 | 1,251 | — | |
| 2017 | #264 | 1,213 | — | |
| 2016 | #295 | 1,103 | — | |
| 2015 | #291 | 1,110 | — | |
| 2014 | #305 | 1,064 | — | |
| 2013 | #327 | 993 | — | |
| 2012 | #338 | 931 | — | |
| 2011 | #355 | 907 | — | |
| 2010 | #345 | 934 | — | |
| 2009 | #354 | 916 | — | |
| 2008 | #355 | 929 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #344 | 964 | — | |
| 2006 | #363 | 892 | — | |
| 2005 | #347 | 908 | — | |
| 2004 | #349 | 915 | — | |
| 2003 | #344 | 897 | — | |
| 2002 | #334 | 906 | — | |
| 2001 | #326 | 951 | — | |
| 2000 | #339 | 909 | — | |
| 1999 | #343 | 875 | — | |
| 1998 | #342 | 853 | — | |
| 1997 | #333 | 857 | — | |
| 1996 | #346 | 802 | — | |
| 1995 | #320 | 853 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #308 | 882 | — | |
| 1993 | #308 | 861 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #319 | 855 | — | |
| 1991 | #285 | 985 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #305 | 907 | #5,823 | 8 |
| 1989 | #273 | 987 | #4,271 | 12 |
| 1988 | #256 | 997 | #3,523 | 14 |
| 1987 | #248 | 1,031 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #238 | 1,084 | #3,440 | 13 |
| 1985 | #232 | 1,116 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #222 | 1,165 | #3,701 | 11 |
| 1983 | #223 | 1,121 | #3,630 | 11 |
| 1982 | #222 | 1,178 | #2,972 | 15 |
| 1981 | #207 | 1,267 | #5,468 | 6 |
| 1980 | #207 | 1,258 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #216 | 1,202 | #4,403 | 8 |
| 1978 | #212 | 1,208 | #3,400 | 11 |
| 1977 | #212 | 1,192 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | #205 | 1,198 | #3,264 | 11 |
| 1975 | #199 | 1,230 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #195 | 1,299 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #201 | 1,273 | #2,606 | 14 |
| 1972 | #201 | 1,383 | — | |
| 1971 | #190 | 1,629 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #178 | 1,817 | #2,891 | 11 |
| 1969 | #168 | 1,900 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #149 | 2,151 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | #145 | 2,420 | #2,030 | 15 |
| 1966 | #128 | 2,845 | #2,465 | 11 |
| 1965 | #118 | 3,231 | #2,366 | 12 |
| 1964 | #114 | 3,640 | #1,975 | 17 |
| 1963 | #113 | 3,869 | #1,957 | 17 |
| 1962 | #104 | 4,294 | #1,713 | 22 |
| 1961 | #96 | 4,896 | #2,409 | 12 |
| 1960 | #97 | 4,943 | #1,973 | 17 |
| 1959 | #97 | 5,057 | #2,414 | 12 |
| 1958 | #90 | 5,247 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | #84 | 5,667 | #1,791 | 20 |
| 1956 | #77 | 6,075 | #2,263 | 13 |
| 1955 | #70 | 6,187 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1954 | #66 | 6,566 | #2,942 | 8 |
| 1953 | #62 | 6,582 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #57 | 6,953 | #1,856 | 17 |
| 1951 | #53 | 7,076 | #2,367 | 11 |
| 1950 | #49 | 7,128 | #2,438 | 10 |
| 1949 | #47 | 7,651 | #1,616 | 21 |
| 1948 | #45 | 7,903 | #2,027 | 14 |
| 1947 | #44 | 8,482 | #1,482 | 25 |
| 1946 | #38 | 8,474 | #1,278 | 30 |
| 1945 | #33 | 8,046 | #1,581 | 18 |
| 1944 | #32 | 8,674 | #1,173 | 32 |
| 1943 | #33 | 9,370 | #1,037 | 42 |
| 1942 | #33 | 9,315 | #1,026 | 43 |
| 1941 | #28 | 8,863 | #1,040 | 39 |
| 1940 | #24 | 8,888 | #1,090 | 36 |
| 1939 | #22 | 9,062 | #867 | 50 |
| 1938 | #21 | 9,303 | #963 | 43 |
| 1937 | #15 | 9,602 | #880 | 49 |
| 1936 | #16 | 9,217 | #940 | 43 |
| 1935 | #15 | 9,988 | #872 | 52 |
| 1934 | #13 | 10,565 | #762 | 65 |
| 1933 | #13 | 11,136 | #860 | 52 |
| 1932 | #11 | 12,257 | #708 | 76 |
| 1931 | #11 | 13,132 | #808 | 60 |
| 1930 | #10 | 14,942 | #765 | 70 |
| 1929 | #8 | 16,021 | #763 | 70 |
| 1928 | #6 | 17,859 | #786 | 68 |
| 1927 | #6 | 19,412 | #668 | 91 |
| 1926 | #6 | 20,225 | #749 | 73 |
| 1925 | #6 | 22,247 | #746 | 77 |
| 1924 | #6 | 23,601 | #797 | 71 |
| 1923 | #6 | 23,637 | #860 | 62 |
| 1922 | #5 | 23,633 | #780 | 73 |
| 1921 | #5 | 25,783 | #920 | 58 |
| 1920 | #5 | 26,102 | #940 | 54 |
| 1919 | #5 | 24,562 | #822 | 63 |
| 1918 | #5 | 25,535 | #975 | 47 |
| 1917 | #5 | 23,568 | #900 | 50 |
| 1916 | #5 | 23,189 | #840 | 55 |
| 1915 | #5 | 21,878 | #916 | 46 |
| 1914 | #5 | 15,839 | #777 | 46 |
| 1913 | #5 | 12,609 | #835 | 33 |
| 1912 | #5 | 11,280 | #635 | 43 |
| 1911 | #5 | 8,003 | #562 | 29 |
| 1910 | #5 | 7,212 | #461 | 35 |
| 1909 | #4 | 6,509 | #653 | 17 |
| 1908 | #4 | 6,180 | #566 | 20 |
| 1907 | #5 | 5,573 | #664 | 15 |
| 1906 | #5 | 5,140 | #523 | 19 |
| 1905 | #5 | 5,068 | #507 | 20 |
| 1904 | #5 | 4,900 | #587 | 15 |
| 1903 | #5 | 4,517 | #619 | 13 |
| 1902 | #5 | 4,384 | #521 | 17 |
| 1901 | #5 | 3,974 | #506 | 15 |
| 1900 | #5 | 4,765 | #623 | 16 |
| 1899 | #5 | 3,912 | #714 | 9 |
| 1898 | #5 | 4,249 | #543 | 15 |
| 1897 | #5 | 3,878 | #422 | 20 |
| 1896 | #5 | 3,905 | #641 | 12 |
| 1895 | #6 | 3,551 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #6 | 3,372 | #521 | 15 |
| 1893 | #3 | 3,658 | #572 | 12 |
| 1892 | #5 | 3,290 | #597 | 12 |
| 1891 | #19 | 1,857 | — | |
| 1890 | #46 | 1,195 | #994 | 5 |
| 1889 | #46 | 1,073 | — | |
| 1888 | #59 | 850 | — | |
| 1887 | #62 | 627 | #921 | 5 |
| 1886 | #66 | 581 | — | |
| 1885 | #70 | 506 | #936 | 5 |
| 1884 | #74 | 442 | — | |
| 1883 | #73 | 387 | — | |
| 1882 | #80 | 323 | — | |
| 1881 | #84 | 275 | — | |
| 1880 | #93 | 234 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Ruth was already there! It came in at #93, and was given to 234 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 330 girls a year got the name.
Where Ruth is popular in 1914
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Nevada#1 · 1 in 13
- Vermont#2 · 1 in 24
- Utah#2 · 1 in 25
- Maine#3 · 1 in 35
- Oklahoma#3 · 1 in 50
Best ever in a state: #1 in Nevada, 1914.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #1 | 15 | 1 in 13 |
| Utah | #2 | 107 | 1 in 25 |
| Vermont | #2 | 82 | 1 in 24 |
| Maine | #3 | 133 | 1 in 35 |
| Oklahoma | #3 | 267 | 1 in 50 |
| South Carolina | #3 | 285 | 1 in 53 |
| Tennessee | #3 | 308 | 1 in 54 |
| Arkansas | #4 | 203 | 1 in 61 |
| Idaho | #4 | 67 | 1 in 31 |
| Indiana | #4 | 492 | 1 in 32 |
| Kentucky | #4 | 302 | 1 in 57 |
| Missouri | #4 | 452 | 1 in 43 |
| Nebraska | #4 | 241 | 1 in 31 |
| North Carolina | #4 | 474 | 1 in 50 |
| North Dakota | #4 | 109 | 1 in 40 |
| Ohio | #4 | 1,152 | 1 in 29 |
| West Virginia | #4 | 250 | 1 in 43 |
| California | #5 | 294 | 1 in 47 |
| Colorado | #5 | 114 | 1 in 39 |
| District of Columbia | #5 | 57 | 1 in 31 |
| Illinois | #5 | 965 | 1 in 41 |
| Iowa | #5 | 369 | 1 in 35 |
| Massachusetts | #5 | 714 | 1 in 39 |
| Michigan | #5 | 482 | 1 in 38 |
| Montana | #5 | 68 | 1 in 41 |
| New Hampshire | #5 | 66 | 1 in 39 |
| New Mexico | #5 | 38 | 1 in 49 |
| Oregon | #5 | 111 | 1 in 30 |
| Texas | #5 | 462 | 1 in 77 |
| Washington | #5 | 145 | 1 in 39 |
| Wisconsin | #5 | 416 | 1 in 35 |
| Wyoming | #5 | 24 | 1 in 25 |
| Alabama | #6 | 296 | 1 in 68 |
| Arizona | #6 | 37 | 1 in 39 |
| Delaware | #6 | 40 | 1 in 29 |
| Kansas | #6 | 229 | 1 in 40 |
| Minnesota | #6 | 282 | 1 in 47 |
| Mississippi | #6 | 187 | 1 in 77 |
| New York | #6 | 1,903 | 1 in 39 |
| South Dakota | #6 | 76 | 1 in 46 |
| Connecticut | #7 | 224 | 1 in 43 |
| Georgia | #7 | 358 | 1 in 70 |
| Maryland | #7 | 225 | 1 in 41 |
| New Jersey | #7 | 473 | 1 in 42 |
| Pennsylvania | #7 | 1,557 | 1 in 42 |
| Virginia | #7 | 329 | 1 in 56 |
| Florida | #8 | 108 | 1 in 67 |
| Rhode Island | #8 | 88 | 1 in 43 |
| Hawaii | #11 | 23 | 1 in 52 |
| Louisiana | #19 | 136 | 1 in 105 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ruth
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 2 spots since 2024 (#171 → #173)
- 46 spots since 2020 (#219 → #173)
- 118 spots since 2015 (#291 → #173)
- Biggest jump: 32 spots in 2021 (#219 → #187)
- Biggest drop: 34 spots in 1992 (#285 → #319)
Rise & fade · girls
13 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1893 at #3 (3,658 births)
- Births halved by 1970, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 39 yrs
- Top 10: 39 yrs · run 1892–1930
- Top 100: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45
- Highest: 1 in 45 girls born in 1915 were named Ruth (2.2%)
- Latest: 1 in 902 girls born in 2025 (0.11%)
- Its best rank, #3 in 1893, was only 1 in 58 (1.7%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 26.1% of all girls named Ruth (218,520) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5,298 | #46 (1889) | #71 |
| 1890s | 32,867 | #3 (1893) | #11 |
| 1900s | 51,010 | #4 (1909) | #5 |
| 1910s | 173,675 | #5 (1918) | #5 |
| 1920s | 218,520 | #5 (1920) | #6 |
| 1930s | 109,204 | #10 (1930) | #15 |
| 1940s | 85,666 | #24 (1940) | #36 |
| 1950s | 62,538 | #49 (1950) | #71 |
| 1960s | 34,189 | #96 (1961) | #123 |
| 1970s | 13,431 | #178 (1970) | #201 |
| 1980s | 11,204 | #207 (1981) | #233 |
| 1990s | 8,730 | #285 (1991) | #321 |
| 2000s | 9,187 | #326 (2001) | #346 |
| 2010s | 10,857 | #231 (2019) | #301 |
| 2020s | 9,746 | #171 (2024) | #186 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ruth in 1914
girls
#5
15,839 births · 1 in 48 girls
boys
#777
46 births · 1 in 14,234 boys
Top girls' names in 1914
Top boys' names in 1914
More about 1914
girls
761,581 girls got a published name in 1914; 1 in 48 of them was named Ruth, which outranked 99.9% of the 4,206 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Ruth
Biggest movers since 1913
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
654,762 boys got a published name in 1914; 1 in 14,234 of them was named Ruth, which outranked 79.3% of the 3,759 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).