Ruthann

#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births

Peak · girls
1943 · 258 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
7,098
since 1906

Ruthann over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Ruthann has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201937peak #459, 1943girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#5,55422
2024#4,29433
2023#4,74628
2022#5,46523
2021#5,09125
2020#5,48722
2019#6,69817
2018#5,00726
2017#3,84839
2016#4,53131
2015#5,45824
2014#4,89228
2013#4,54331
2012#5,11427
2011#5,06327
2010#5,10827
2009#5,22627
2008#4,17937
2007#5,23027
2006#5,08627
2005#4,19533
2004#4,70728
2003#5,23523
2002#5,67320
2001#3,94032
2000#4,07930
1999#3,71832
1998#4,02328
1997#4,23925
1996#4,88320
1995#4,84620
1994#5,24918
1993#4,52422
1992#3,86627
1991#3,81727
1990#4,12024
1989#3,89325
1988#3,09532
1987#2,53140
1986#3,05430
1985#2,86032
1984#2,34041
1983#2,31041
1982#2,45139
1981#2,23145
1980#2,53737
1979#2,47737
1978#2,51634
1977#2,06346
1976#2,60230
1975#1,98644
1974#2,06640
1973#2,06439
1972#1,77149
1971#2,13738
1970#1,65356
1969#1,35571
1968#1,33469
1967#1,16483
1966#1,05099
1965#1,33767
1964#1,09799
1963#1,003113
1962#992117
1961#866151
1960#946127
1959#959121
1958#988110
1957#1,002108
1956#1,18677
1955#1,05092
1954#1,03390
1953#1,10377
1952#93598
1951#772132
1950#701150
1949#646164
1948#588200
1947#593206
1946#499244
1945#485221
1944#471230
1943#459258
1942#470247
1941#465224
1940#490196
1939#479194
1938#515169
1937#563145
1936#84065
1935#1,05543
1934#1,12440
1933#1,24433
1932#1,29332
1931#1,17537
1930#1,28934
1929#1,30633
1928#1,19141
1927#1,52329
1926#1,54128
1925#1,44332
1924#1,50331
1923#1,73624
1922#1,95720
1921#2,19517
1920#2,46314
1919#3,8177
1918#2,37614
1917#2,87910
1916#2,36813
1915#4,2745
1914#3,6185
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910#2,3985
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906#1,9515
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1906

The first year at least five girls were named Ruthann! It came in at #1,951, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1906–1915, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Ruthann is popular in 1937

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMNIllinois: #358 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,995 girlsILWisconsin: #333 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,623 girlsWIMichigan: #249 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,345 girlsMINew York: #466 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 7,594 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedIAIndiana: #226 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,000 girlsINOhio: #228 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 2,110 girlsOHPennsylvania: #255 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 2,468 girlsPANew Jersey: #245 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,398 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Ruthann, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Indiana#226 · 1 in 2,000
  2. Ohio#228 · 1 in 2,110
  3. New Jersey#245 · 1 in 2,398
  4. Michigan#249 · 1 in 2,345
  5. Pennsylvania#255 · 1 in 2,468

Best ever in a state: #149 in Connecticut, 1943.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Indiana#226121 in 2,000
Ohio#228231 in 2,110
New Jersey#245101 in 2,398
Michigan#249171 in 2,345
Pennsylvania#255291 in 2,468
Wisconsin#33351 in 4,623
Illinois#358131 in 3,995
New York#466111 in 7,594
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Ruthann
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 1,260 spots since 2024 (#4,294 → #5,554)
  • 67 spots since 2020 (#5,487 → #5,554)
  • 96 spots since 2015 (#5,458 → #5,554)
  • Biggest jump: 277 spots in 1937 (#840 → #563)
  • Biggest drop: 168 spots in 1953 (#935 → #1,103)
Rise & fade · girls
37 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1906
  • Peaked 1943 at #459 (258 births)
  • Births halved by 1952, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 22 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 22 yrs · run 1936–1952
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,393
  • Highest: 1 in 5,393 girls born in 1941 were named Ruthann (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #459 in 1943, was only 1 in 5,408 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 30.9% of all girls named Ruthann (2,190) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s5#1,951 (1906)#1,951
1910s59#2,368 (1916)#3,104
1920s269#1,191 (1928)#1,686
1930s792#479 (1939)#958
1940s2,190#459 (1943)#517
1950s1,055#701 (1950)#973
1960s996#866 (1961)#1,114
1970s413#1,653 (1970)#2,134
1980s362#2,231 (1981)#2,730
1990s243#3,718 (1999)#4,329
2000s284#3,940 (2001)#4,755
2010s277#3,848 (2017)#5,026
2020s153#4,294 (2024)#5,106

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Ruthann in 1937

girls
#563
145 births · 1 in 7,338 girls

Top girls' names in 1937

  1. #1Mary55,641
  2. #2Barbara34,917
  3. #3Patricia26,838
  4. #4Shirley26,823
  5. #5Betty25,337
  6. #6Carol17,336
  7. #7Nancy17,074
  8. #8Dorothy16,572
  9. #9Joan15,301
  10. #10Margaret15,144
  11. #563Ruthann145
More about 1937

girls

1,064,033 girls got a published name in 1937; 1 in 7,338 of them was named Ruthann, which outranked 88.6% of the 4,930 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ruthann
  1. #558Doretha146
  2. #558Marilee146
  3. #558Maryjane146
  4. #563Ruthann145
  5. #563Cheryl145
  6. #565Carroll144
  7. #565Delphine144
  8. #565George144

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1936
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,217Noreta#4,181 → #964
  2. ↑ 2,845Noretta#3,701 → #856
  3. ↑ 2,351Leilani#3,103 → #752
  4. ↑ 1,407Deann#2,263 → #856
  5. ↑ 1,209Norita#1,741 → #532
Fallers
  1. ↓ 438Dorla#951 → #1,389
  2. ↓ 331Vilma#951 → #1,282
  3. ↓ 303Imelda#979 → #1,282
  4. ↓ 297Lulu#695 → #992
  5. ↓ 292Lyda#840 → #1,132

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1937 →