Saige
- #480 for girls in 2025, 640 births
- #2,332 for boys in 2025, 59 births
- Given to girls 91.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 791 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,119since 1984
Saige over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #480 | 640 | #2,332 | 59 |
| 2024 | #448 | 698 | #2,288 | 62 |
| 2023 | #433 | 713 | #2,129 | 68 |
| 2022 | #395 | 791 | #2,243 | 64 |
| 2021 | #503 | 621 | #2,523 | 52 |
| 2020 | #597 | 487 | #2,886 | 41 |
| 2019 | #656 | 446 | #3,259 | 35 |
| 2018 | #654 | 451 | #2,635 | 47 |
| 2017 | #624 | 476 | #3,312 | 34 |
| 2016 | #617 | 485 | #3,358 | 33 |
| 2015 | #714 | 398 | #4,711 | 20 |
| 2014 | #605 | 481 | #4,538 | 21 |
| 2013 | #651 | 436 | #3,582 | 29 |
| 2012 | #929 | 276 | #6,626 | 12 |
| 2011 | #940 | 274 | #5,200 | 17 |
| 2010 | #892 | 297 | #3,708 | 28 |
| 2009 | #842 | 331 | #3,399 | 32 |
| 2008 | #823 | 347 | #3,744 | 28 |
| 2007 | #821 | 350 | #4,011 | 25 |
| 2006 | #806 | 340 | #3,083 | 35 |
| 2005 | #747 | 361 | #3,172 | 32 |
| 2004 | #733 | 360 | #3,860 | 23 |
| 2003 | #918 | 259 | #4,114 | 20 |
| 2002 | #898 | 249 | #3,450 | 25 |
| 2001 | #939 | 236 | #2,562 | 37 |
| 2000 | #939 | 228 | #2,015 | 50 |
| 1999 | #991 | 207 | #3,031 | 27 |
| 1998 | #1,094 | 176 | #3,296 | 23 |
| 1997 | #1,249 | 142 | #2,260 | 37 |
| 1996 | #1,375 | 122 | #3,202 | 22 |
| 1995 | #1,550 | 98 | #3,020 | 23 |
| 1994 | #1,841 | 77 | #3,911 | 16 |
| 1993 | #1,776 | 82 | #2,943 | 23 |
| 1992 | #2,386 | 54 | #2,670 | 26 |
| 1991 | #2,519 | 49 | #2,915 | 22 |
| 1990 | #3,227 | 34 | #5,823 | 8 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Saige! It came in at #9,144, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1986, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Saige is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Louisiana#147 · 1 in 585
- Maryland#183 · 1 in 714
- South Dakota#188 · 1 in 509
- Alabama#247 · 1 in 964
- Missouri#256 · 1 in 1,012
Best ever in a state: #105 in District of Columbia, 2022.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #147 | 28 | 1 in 585 |
| Maryland | #183 | 28 | 1 in 714 |
| South Dakota | #188 | 6 | 1 in 509 |
| Alabama | #247 | 19 | 1 in 964 |
| Missouri | #256 | 24 | 1 in 1,012 |
| Georgia | #262 | 39 | 1 in 1,159 |
| Kansas | #286 | 11 | 1 in 1,073 |
| New Mexico | #296 | 5 | 1 in 935 |
| Pennsylvania | #310 | 35 | 1 in 1,334 |
| North Carolina | #311 | 35 | 1 in 1,328 |
| Utah | #330 | 13 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Nebraska | #335 | 6 | 1 in 1,183 |
| South Carolina | #347 | 14 | 1 in 1,306 |
| Connecticut | #350 | 8 | 1 in 1,438 |
| Ohio | #401 | 28 | 1 in 1,688 |
| Kentucky | #405 | 10 | 1 in 1,725 |
| Arkansas | #425 | 7 | 1 in 1,513 |
| Nevada | #433 | 6 | 1 in 1,534 |
| Iowa | #437 | 7 | 1 in 1,682 |
| Wisconsin | #447 | 11 | 1 in 1,842 |
| Michigan | #457 | 18 | 1 in 1,985 |
| New York | #481 | 35 | 1 in 2,238 |
| Oklahoma | #483 | 8 | 1 in 1,848 |
| Mississippi | #514 | 5 | 1 in 1,780 |
| Florida | #531 | 34 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Virginia | #541 | 14 | 1 in 2,410 |
| Washington | #541 | 12 | 1 in 2,405 |
| Arizona | #546 | 12 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Texas | #615 | 51 | 1 in 3,148 |
| Massachusetts | #624 | 8 | 1 in 3,004 |
| New Jersey | #667 | 11 | 1 in 3,227 |
| Colorado | #789 | 6 | 1 in 3,888 |
| Illinois | #797 | 11 | 1 in 4,030 |
| Minnesota | #835 | 5 | 1 in 4,296 |
| Indiana | #916 | 6 | 1 in 4,651 |
| Tennessee | #983 | 6 | 1 in 5,346 |
| California | #1,027 | 26 | 1 in 6,220 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Saige
- 32 spots since 2024 (#448 → #480)
- 117 spots since 2020 (#597 → #480)
- Biggest jump: 278 spots in 2013
- Biggest drop: 109 spots in 2015
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2022 at #395 (791 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1999–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,073 girls born in 2022 were named Saige (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,511 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- 33.2% of all girls named Saige (4,020) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 47 | #4,653 (1988) | #6,832 |
| 1990s | 1,041 | #991 (1999) | #1,801 |
| 2000s | 3,061 | #733 (2004) | #847 |
| 2010s | 4,020 | #605 (2014) | #728 |
| 2020s | 3,950 | #395 (2022) | #476 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Saige ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: