Samantha

#151 for girls in 2025, 1,973 births · Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1998 · 20,195 births
Debut · girls
21 births
In top 100 · girls
45 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
592,847
since 1880

Samantha over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201961peak #3, 1998girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1511,973—
2024#1262,232—
2023#1142,372—
2022#1062,605—
2021#1062,599—
2020#902,956—
2019#803,369—
2018#613,924—
2017#544,333#12,2465
2016#444,956#12,1855
2015#405,347#9,5687
2014#335,735#6,63212
2013#296,516#9,6557
2012#266,938#8,8648
2011#177,400—
2010#158,411#5,25117
2009#149,669#5,33417
2008#1111,190#6,07014
2007#1211,883#9,7887
2006#1012,470#4,86518
2005#813,642#4,82417
2004#913,786#2,69739
2003#1013,870#5,87712
2002#914,671#3,67023
2001#715,867#4,67616
2000#717,265#3,76421
1999#519,044#2,51035
1998#320,195#2,85128
1997#620,170#3,60119
1996#520,552#2,29935
1995#421,644#2,29934
1994#422,824#2,44431
1993#423,668#2,25734
1992#624,407#2,04638
1991#525,651#1,67749
1990#525,868#1,48658
1989#624,792#926120
1988#820,700#1,20471
1987#1117,944#1,13671
1986#2114,092#1,33454
1985#2910,658#1,79433
1984#398,038#2,23223
1983#407,703#1,74832
1982#446,768#2,26922
1981#515,516#2,77916
1980#584,913#3,43012
1979#664,461#2,77716
1978#743,886#2,47318
1977#853,284#4,5827
1976#853,347#2,70915
1975#1012,834#3,07812
1974#1282,251#2,94612
1973#1352,119#3,22310
1972#1372,220#3,9637
1971#1442,209#2,46415
1970#1492,295#3,2829
1969#1402,422#2,86110
1968#1362,335#3,6736
1967#1761,804—
1966#1821,793—
1965#1791,961#2,9828
1964#474415—
1963#1,30571—
1962#1,29273—
1961#1,30572—
1960#1,21281—
1959#1,001111—
1958#994109—
1957#1,75438—
1956#2,00529—
1955#2,06327—
1954#1,90930—
1953#1,78331—
1952#1,56038—
1951#1,52838—
1950#1,57635—
1949#1,39344—
1948#1,46140—
1947#1,75230—
1946#1,53233—
1945#1,45031—
1944#1,69824—
1943#1,62527—
1942#1,70624—
1941#1,81020—
1940#1,84519—
1939#1,58523—
1938#1,94517—
1937#1,58023—
1936#1,69120—
1935#1,60622—
1934#2,08715—
1933#2,05215—
1932#2,03716—
1931#2,75010—
1930#2,30614—
1929#2,30114—
1928#2,38114—
1927#2,85911—
1926#3,2699—
1925#2,01819—
1924#2,40915—
1923#1,84022—
1922#1,57528—
1921#1,57728—
1920#1,62626—
1919#1,69823—
1918#2,10217—
1917#1,60523—
1916#1,73920—
1915#1,67220—
1914#1,44420—
1913#1,67013—
1912#1,17820—
1911#1,17115—
1910#1,52110—
1909#1,36910—
1908#1,13513—
1907#94516—
1906#1,04313—
1905#1,09312—
1904#1,3648—
1903#1,7925—
1902#90315—
1901#82916—
1900#68827—
1899#83515—
1898#71921—
1897#89513—
1896#75418—
1895#78816—
1894#74416—
1893#64420—
1892#63820—
1891#58920—
1890#69315—
1889#68714—
1888#59318—
1887#56016—
1886#63313—
1885#52017—
1884#52016—
1883#46517—
1882#47515—
1881#49112—
1880#35221—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Samantha was already there! It came in at #352, and was given to 21 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1903, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Samantha is popular in 1961

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMNIllinois: #903 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 15,232 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedINOhio: #896 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 17,374 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,069 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 17,513 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedALGeorgia: #704 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,910 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedHITexas: #1,324 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 22,352 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Samantha, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Georgia#704 · 1 in 8,910
  2. Ohio#896 · 1 in 17,374
  3. Illinois#903 · 1 in 15,232
  4. California#1,069 · 1 in 17,513
  5. Texas#1,324 · 1 in 22,352

Best ever in a state: #1 in North Dakota, 1993.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Georgia#70451 in 8,910
Ohio#89661 in 17,374
Illinois#90371 in 15,232
California#1,069101 in 17,513
Texas#1,32451 in 22,352
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Samantha
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 25 spots since 2024 (#126 → #151)
  • 61 spots since 2020 (#90 → #151)
  • 111 spots since 2015 (#40 → #151)
  • Biggest jump: 831 spots in 1964 (#1,305 → #474)
  • Biggest drop: 889 spots in 1903 (#903 → #1,792)
Rise & fade · girls
118 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1998 at #3 (20,195 births)
  • Births halved by 2009, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 19 yrs
  • Top 10: 19 yrs · run 1988–2006
  • Top 100: 45 yrs · run 1976–2020
  • Top 1,000: 87 yrs · run 1964–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 73
  • Highest: 1 in 73 girls born in 1991 were named Samantha (1.4%)
  • Latest: 1 in 815 girls born in 2025 (0.12%)
  • Its best rank, #3 in 1998, was only 1 in 87 (1.1%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 37.8% of all girls named Samantha (224,023) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s159#352 (1880)#530
1890s174#589 (1891)#730
1900s135#688 (1900)#1,116
1910s181#1,171 (1911)#1,580
1920s186#1,575 (1922)#2,186
1930s175#1,580 (1937)#1,964
1940s292#1,393 (1949)#1,627
1950s486#994 (1958)#1,617
1960s11,027#136 (1968)#640
1970s28,906#66 (1979)#110
1980s121,124#6 (1989)#31
1990s224,023#3 (1998)#5
2000s134,313#7 (2000)#10
2010s56,929#15 (2010)#40
2020s14,737#90 (2020)#116

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Samantha in 1961

girls
#1,305
72 births · 1 in 28,035 girls

Top girls' names in 1961

  1. #1Mary47,682
  2. #2Lisa42,720
  3. #3Susan37,532
  4. #4Linda35,597
  5. #5Karen34,707
  6. #6Patricia28,889
  7. #7Donna28,679
  8. #8Cynthia24,393
  9. #9Sandra24,153
  10. #10Deborah24,107
  11. #1,305Samantha72
More about 1961

girls

2,018,495 girls got a published name in 1961; 1 in 28,035 of them was named Samantha, which outranked 82.7% of the 7,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Samantha
  1. #1,297Roselyn73
  2. #1,297Sheena73
  3. #1,297Tracee73
  4. #1,305Samantha72
  5. #1,305Amalia72
  6. #1,305Elma72
  7. #1,305Emilia72
  8. #1,319Alethea71
  9. #1,319Chana71
  10. #1,319Drema71

Tied with 13 names at #1,305; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1960
Risers
  1. ↑ 997Corinna#1,811 → #814
  2. ↑ 789Sabra#1,637 → #848
  3. ↑ 745Velvet#1,286 → #541
  4. ↑ 601Johnna#1,043 → #442
  5. ↑ 600Damita#1,597 → #997
Fallers
  1. ↓ 317Sheena#980 → #1,297
  2. ↓ 253Lita#909 → #1,162
  3. ↓ 241Jannette#970 → #1,211
  4. ↓ 229Francisca#939 → #1,168
  5. ↓ 214Andra#822 → #1,036

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1961 →