Saylor
- #217 for girls in 2025, 1,415 births
- #2,390 for boys in 2025, 57 births
- Given to girls 94.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 1,410 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,482since 1992
Saylor over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it. Not on the chart: 5 boys in 1917 (see the data table).
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #217 | 1,415 | #2,390 | 57 |
| 2024 | #231 | 1,341 | #2,210 | 65 |
| 2023 | #214 | 1,398 | #1,909 | 82 |
| 2022 | #207 | 1,410 | #2,150 | 68 |
| 2021 | #258 | 1,193 | #2,096 | 69 |
| 2020 | #304 | 1,070 | #2,437 | 53 |
| 2019 | #308 | 1,053 | #2,265 | 61 |
| 2018 | #364 | 868 | #2,848 | 42 |
| 2017 | #429 | 741 | #3,889 | 27 |
| 2016 | #441 | 729 | #3,358 | 33 |
| 2015 | #608 | 480 | #3,085 | 37 |
| 2014 | #800 | 351 | #3,693 | 28 |
| 2013 | #902 | 283 | #4,463 | 21 |
| 2012 | #1,119 | 222 | #4,862 | 19 |
| 2011 | #1,182 | 204 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #1,299 | 181 | #6,359 | 13 |
| 2009 | #1,258 | 194 | #8,310 | 9 |
| 2008 | #1,345 | 182 | #7,187 | 11 |
| 2007 | #1,579 | 143 | #4,996 | 18 |
| 2006 | #1,574 | 137 | #6,094 | 13 |
| 2005 | #1,367 | 158 | #5,278 | 15 |
| 2004 | #1,542 | 129 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #1,702 | 112 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #1,866 | 95 | #5,131 | 14 |
| 2001 | #1,476 | 127 | #6,445 | 10 |
| 2000 | #1,801 | 96 | #4,389 | 17 |
| 1999 | #1,707 | 96 | #4,537 | 15 |
| 1998 | #4,796 | 22 | #5,840 | 10 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | — | |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #5,109 | 11 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | — | |
| 1991 | — | #7,271 | 6 | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1992
The first year at least five girls were named Saylor! It came in at #13,317, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1992, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Saylor is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Wyoming#45 · 1 in 116
- Mississippi#45 · 1 in 254
- Alabama#62 · 1 in 321
- Arkansas#77 · 1 in 331
- Oklahoma#94 · 1 in 399
Best ever in a state: #43 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #45 | 35 | 1 in 254 |
| Wyoming | #45 | 7 | 1 in 116 |
| Alabama | #62 | 57 | 1 in 321 |
| Arkansas | #77 | 32 | 1 in 331 |
| Oklahoma | #94 | 37 | 1 in 399 |
| Iowa | #96 | 31 | 1 in 380 |
| West Virginia | #124 | 12 | 1 in 423 |
| Kentucky | #125 | 35 | 1 in 493 |
| Tennessee | #125 | 59 | 1 in 544 |
| North Carolina | #129 | 77 | 1 in 604 |
| Kansas | #130 | 24 | 1 in 492 |
| Alaska | #134 | 5 | 1 in 331 |
| Utah | #136 | 33 | 1 in 517 |
| Indiana | #138 | 48 | 1 in 581 |
| Missouri | #139 | 43 | 1 in 565 |
| South Carolina | #139 | 32 | 1 in 572 |
| North Dakota | #141 | 7 | 1 in 386 |
| Georgia | #149 | 65 | 1 in 696 |
| New Hampshire | #149 | 8 | 1 in 475 |
| Maine | #153 | 7 | 1 in 445 |
| Idaho | #160 | 13 | 1 in 551 |
| Hawaii | #168 | 5 | 1 in 429 |
| Montana | #168 | 6 | 1 in 471 |
| Nebraska | #169 | 13 | 1 in 546 |
| Oregon | #169 | 21 | 1 in 622 |
| Virginia | #186 | 44 | 1 in 767 |
| South Dakota | #188 | 6 | 1 in 509 |
| Minnesota | #193 | 28 | 1 in 767 |
| Louisiana | #195 | 22 | 1 in 744 |
| Florida | #207 | 91 | 1 in 953 |
| Colorado | #209 | 29 | 1 in 804 |
| Ohio | #225 | 51 | 1 in 927 |
| Arizona | #230 | 30 | 1 in 941 |
| Maryland | #253 | 20 | 1 in 999 |
| Michigan | #272 | 33 | 1 in 1,083 |
| Pennsylvania | #288 | 38 | 1 in 1,229 |
| Texas | #296 | 117 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Wisconsin | #344 | 15 | 1 in 1,351 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Massachusetts | #375 | 15 | 1 in 1,602 |
| Connecticut | #459 | 6 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Illinois | #484 | 21 | 1 in 2,111 |
| California | #491 | 68 | 1 in 2,378 |
| Washington | #511 | 13 | 1 in 2,220 |
| New Jersey | #535 | 14 | 1 in 2,536 |
| New York | #704 | 23 | 1 in 3,406 |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Saylor
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 87 spots since 2020 (#304 → #217)
- Biggest jump: 217 spots in 2013
- Biggest drop: 17 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · girls
30 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1992
- Peaked 2022 at #207 (1,410 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 13 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 13 yrs · run 2013–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,136
- Highest: 1 in 1,136 girls born in 2025 were named Saylor (0.09%)
- Its best rank, #207 in 2022, was only 1 in 1,163 (0.09%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 54.0% of all girls named Saylor (7,827) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1995
- Mostly boys until 1994, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 170 | #1,707 (1999) | #7,912 |
| 2000s | 1,373 | #1,258 (2009) | #1,551 |
| 2010s | 5,112 | #308 (2019) | #745 |
| 2020s | 7,827 | #207 (2022) | #239 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Saylor ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: