Scott
Last seen for girls in 2001 at #13,521 · #534 for boys in 2025, 561 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1971 · 30,901 births
- Debut · boys
- 60 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 47 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 774,997since 1880
Scott over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #534 | 561 | |
| 2024 | — | #565 | 518 | |
| 2023 | — | #598 | 474 | |
| 2022 | — | #588 | 487 | |
| 2021 | — | #609 | 457 | |
| 2020 | — | #562 | 498 | |
| 2019 | — | #524 | 544 | |
| 2018 | — | #517 | 549 | |
| 2017 | — | #482 | 607 | |
| 2016 | — | #464 | 658 | |
| 2015 | — | #454 | 668 | |
| 2014 | — | #422 | 727 | |
| 2013 | — | #428 | 685 | |
| 2012 | — | #382 | 778 | |
| 2011 | — | #370 | 804 | |
| 2010 | — | #351 | 873 | |
| 2009 | — | #342 | 920 | |
| 2008 | — | #321 | 1,034 | |
| 2007 | — | #274 | 1,252 | |
| 2006 | — | #253 | 1,365 | |
| 2005 | — | #233 | 1,474 | |
| 2004 | — | #214 | 1,640 | |
| 2003 | — | #206 | 1,771 | |
| 2002 | — | #185 | 2,028 | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #167 | 2,296 |
| 2000 | — | #158 | 2,458 | |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #140 | 2,720 |
| 1998 | — | #123 | 3,062 | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #113 | 3,344 |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #108 | 3,672 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #92 | 4,082 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #80 | 4,915 |
| 1993 | #4,257 | 24 | #69 | 5,577 |
| 1992 | #7,512 | 11 | #61 | 6,447 |
| 1991 | #5,004 | 19 | #57 | 7,114 |
| 1990 | #4,120 | 24 | #53 | 8,086 |
| 1989 | #3,165 | 33 | #51 | 8,850 |
| 1988 | #2,011 | 59 | #47 | 9,351 |
| 1987 | #1,678 | 72 | #43 | 10,194 |
| 1986 | #1,952 | 56 | #44 | 9,965 |
| 1985 | #1,784 | 63 | #44 | 10,145 |
| 1984 | #1,593 | 70 | #39 | 10,574 |
| 1983 | #1,817 | 58 | #38 | 10,846 |
| 1982 | #1,735 | 64 | #34 | 12,200 |
| 1981 | #1,830 | 60 | #34 | 12,719 |
| 1980 | #1,720 | 65 | #33 | 13,300 |
| 1979 | #1,338 | 92 | #29 | 14,440 |
| 1978 | #1,614 | 66 | #30 | 13,539 |
| 1977 | #1,736 | 59 | #27 | 14,203 |
| 1976 | #1,585 | 63 | #24 | 15,717 |
| 1975 | #1,247 | 91 | #17 | 17,307 |
| 1974 | #1,300 | 82 | #18 | 18,030 |
| 1973 | #1,293 | 79 | #18 | 18,980 |
| 1972 | #1,146 | 95 | #11 | 22,838 |
| 1971 | #957 | 133 | #10 | 30,901 |
| 1970 | #1,008 | 124 | #12 | 28,565 |
| 1969 | #975 | 121 | #12 | 28,653 |
| 1968 | #1,066 | 98 | #14 | 26,022 |
| 1967 | #1,255 | 73 | #16 | 25,535 |
| 1966 | #1,262 | 73 | #16 | 26,036 |
| 1965 | #1,194 | 81 | #15 | 25,437 |
| 1964 | #1,372 | 67 | #14 | 28,506 |
| 1963 | #1,226 | 80 | #12 | 30,396 |
| 1962 | #1,304 | 72 | #11 | 30,703 |
| 1961 | #1,720 | 44 | #19 | 23,934 |
| 1960 | #1,982 | 33 | #23 | 21,606 |
| 1959 | #1,765 | 39 | #24 | 19,765 |
| 1958 | #1,939 | 32 | #25 | 19,175 |
| 1957 | #1,928 | 32 | #32 | 15,750 |
| 1956 | #2,453 | 21 | #34 | 13,214 |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 | #38 | 10,782 |
| 1954 | #2,450 | 20 | #40 | 9,457 |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | #46 | 7,489 |
| 1952 | #2,502 | 18 | #54 | 6,538 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | #68 | 5,381 |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #82 | 4,268 |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #99 | 3,055 |
| 1948 | #4,205 | 7 | #122 | 2,299 |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #139 | 2,029 |
| 1946 | #4,960 | 5 | #155 | 1,522 |
| 1945 | — | #182 | 848 | |
| 1944 | — | #226 | 610 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #262 | 540 |
| 1942 | — | #259 | 518 | |
| 1941 | — | #289 | 402 | |
| 1940 | — | #303 | 338 | |
| 1939 | — | #335 | 276 | |
| 1938 | — | #347 | 259 | |
| 1937 | — | #371 | 218 | |
| 1936 | — | #368 | 218 | |
| 1935 | — | #376 | 209 | |
| 1934 | — | #429 | 171 | |
| 1933 | — | #422 | 168 | |
| 1932 | — | #425 | 173 | |
| 1931 | — | #484 | 139 | |
| 1930 | — | #494 | 145 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #459 | 164 |
| 1928 | — | #435 | 188 | |
| 1927 | — | #462 | 176 | |
| 1926 | — | #446 | 185 | |
| 1925 | — | #442 | 184 | |
| 1924 | — | #424 | 206 | |
| 1923 | — | #413 | 210 | |
| 1922 | — | #426 | 199 | |
| 1921 | — | #424 | 204 | |
| 1920 | — | #436 | 192 | |
| 1919 | — | #428 | 189 | |
| 1918 | — | #466 | 161 | |
| 1917 | — | #436 | 170 | |
| 1916 | — | #472 | 147 | |
| 1915 | — | #432 | 157 | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #404 | 138 |
| 1913 | #3,187 | 5 | #396 | 116 |
| 1912 | — | #391 | 96 | |
| 1911 | — | #353 | 61 | |
| 1910 | — | #365 | 49 | |
| 1909 | — | #388 | 39 | |
| 1908 | — | #355 | 41 | |
| 1907 | — | #341 | 40 | |
| 1906 | — | #335 | 38 | |
| 1905 | — | #404 | 28 | |
| 1904 | — | #340 | 35 | |
| 1903 | — | #401 | 24 | |
| 1902 | — | #326 | 36 | |
| 1901 | — | #347 | 28 | |
| 1900 | — | #350 | 39 | |
| 1899 | — | #362 | 25 | |
| 1898 | — | #350 | 30 | |
| 1897 | — | #263 | 44 | |
| 1896 | — | #338 | 31 | |
| 1895 | — | #269 | 43 | |
| 1894 | — | #253 | 47 | |
| 1893 | — | #287 | 36 | |
| 1892 | — | #253 | 49 | |
| 1891 | — | #273 | 35 | |
| 1890 | — | #272 | 40 | |
| 1889 | — | #241 | 46 | |
| 1888 | — | #269 | 44 | |
| 1887 | — | #261 | 38 | |
| 1886 | — | #262 | 42 | |
| 1885 | — | #227 | 52 | |
| 1884 | — | #221 | 56 | |
| 1883 | — | #229 | 47 | |
| 1882 | — | #242 | 48 | |
| 1881 | — | #215 | 51 | |
| 1880 | — | #200 | 60 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Scott was already there! It came in at #200, and was given to 60 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1905, when fewer than 37 boys a year got the name.
Where Scott is popular in 1963
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#5 · 1 in 32
- Minnesota#5 · 1 in 32
- Vermont#6 · 1 in 33
- South Dakota#6 · 1 in 33
- North Dakota#6 · 1 in 34
Best ever in a state: #2 in Maine, 1970.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #5 | 889 | 1 in 32 |
| Minnesota | #5 | 1,214 | 1 in 32 |
| North Dakota | #6 | 198 | 1 in 34 |
| South Dakota | #6 | 224 | 1 in 33 |
| Utah | #6 | 297 | 1 in 38 |
| Vermont | #6 | 114 | 1 in 33 |
| Nebraska | #7 | 448 | 1 in 34 |
| New Hampshire | #7 | 199 | 1 in 31 |
| Washington | #7 | 653 | 1 in 44 |
| Wisconsin | #7 | 1,359 | 1 in 32 |
| Colorado | #8 | 428 | 1 in 49 |
| Idaho | #8 | 137 | 1 in 46 |
| Maine | #8 | 301 | 1 in 33 |
| Michigan | #8 | 1,824 | 1 in 47 |
| Montana | #8 | 153 | 1 in 45 |
| Oregon | #8 | 364 | 1 in 45 |
| Arizona | #9 | 237 | 1 in 70 |
| Indiana | #9 | 1,029 | 1 in 50 |
| Kansas | #9 | 385 | 1 in 53 |
| Wyoming | #9 | 72 | 1 in 41 |
| California | #10 | 2,903 | 1 in 65 |
| Illinois | #10 | 1,998 | 1 in 54 |
| Hawaii | #11 | 107 | 1 in 68 |
| Nevada | #11 | 60 | 1 in 61 |
| Ohio | #11 | 1,942 | 1 in 53 |
| Connecticut | #12 | 453 | 1 in 58 |
| Massachusetts | #12 | 1,174 | 1 in 47 |
| Pennsylvania | #12 | 1,908 | 1 in 57 |
| New Jersey | #13 | 976 | 1 in 63 |
| Oklahoma | #13 | 296 | 1 in 76 |
| Missouri | #14 | 684 | 1 in 65 |
| Alaska | #15 | 44 | 1 in 73 |
| Florida | #15 | 629 | 1 in 85 |
| Rhode Island | #15 | 153 | 1 in 56 |
| New York | #16 | 2,506 | 1 in 70 |
| New Mexico | #19 | 111 | 1 in 110 |
| Delaware | #22 | 59 | 1 in 86 |
| Texas | #25 | 836 | 1 in 138 |
| Maryland | #26 | 316 | 1 in 104 |
| West Virginia | #26 | 151 | 1 in 113 |
| Kentucky | #28 | 271 | 1 in 122 |
| Virginia | #29 | 342 | 1 in 126 |
| South Carolina | #30 | 181 | 1 in 149 |
| Arkansas | #31 | 154 | 1 in 126 |
| District of Columbia | #31 | 119 | 1 in 123 |
| Georgia | #32 | 313 | 1 in 150 |
| Louisiana | #35 | 249 | 1 in 159 |
| North Carolina | #35 | 334 | 1 in 151 |
| Tennessee | #35 | 280 | 1 in 136 |
| Alabama | #41 | 205 | 1 in 171 |
| Mississippi | #55 | 117 | 1 in 221 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Scott
- 31 spots since 2024 (#565 → #534)
- 28 spots since 2020 (#562 → #534)
- 80 spots since 2015 (#454 → #534)
- Biggest jump: 75 spots in 1897 (#338 → #263)
- Biggest drop: 87 spots in 1898 (#263 → #350)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1971 at #10 (30,901 births)
- Births halved by 1977, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: 1 yr · 1971
- Top 100: 47 yrs · run 1949–1995
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 57 boys born in 1971 were named Scott (1.7%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,045 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 34.4% of all boys named Scott (266,828) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 484 | #200 (1880) | #237 |
| 1890s | 380 | #253 (1892) | #292 |
| 1900s | 348 | #326 (1902) | #359 |
| 1910s | 1,284 | #353 (1911) | #414 |
| 1920s | 1,908 | #413 (1923) | #437 |
| 1930s | 1,976 | #335 (1939) | #405 |
| 1940s | 12,161 | #99 (1949) | #204 |
| 1950s | 111,819 | #24 (1959) | #44 |
| 1960s | 266,828 | #11 (1962) | #15 |
| 1970s | 194,520 | #10 (1971) | #20 |
| 1980s | 108,144 | #33 (1980) | #41 |
| 1990s | 49,019 | #53 (1990) | #90 |
| 2000s | 16,238 | #158 (2000) | #235 |
| 2010s | 6,893 | #351 (2010) | #439 |
| 2020s | 2,995 | #534 (2025) | #576 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Scott in 1963
Top girls' names in 1963
Top boys' names in 1963
More about 1963
girls
1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 24,094 of them was named Scott, which outranked 84.0% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,218George81
- #1,218Jada81
- #1,218Sharen81
- #1,226Scott80
- #1,226Amalia80
- #1,226Corrina80
- #1,226Delilah80
- #1,233Beckie79
- #1,233Dodie79
- #1,233Gia79
Tied with 6 names at #1,226; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,031,078 boys got a published name in 1963; 1 in 67 of them was named Scott, which outranked 99.7% of the 4,621 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.