Scout

#995 for girls in 2025, 254 births · #1,393 for boys in 2025, 131 births
Given to girls 71.0% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2022 · 425 births
Debut · girls
12 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
5,129
since 1992

Scout over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202004girlsat peakboysat peak
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#995254#1,393131
2024#924287#1,481122
2023#822336#1,337142
2022#689425#1,099195
2021#829333#1,496119
2020#871309#1,79883
2019#1,042246#1,84981
2018#964274#1,83882
2017#1,014256#1,89776
2016#1,098234#1,81183
2015#1,104235#2,08667
2014#1,173209#2,31756
2013#1,378169#2,02167
2012#1,549142#2,01669
2011#1,280185#2,40352
2010#1,513148#2,18760
2009#1,979105#2,32056
2008#1,990105#2,26558
2007#1,908108#2,68445
2006#1,978101#3,02436
2005#2,18084#2,70140
2004#2,11785#2,53143
2003#2,36870#2,42843
2002#2,44765#2,24946
2001#3,09145#2,38641
2000#3,16943#3,07528
1999#2,93545#2,79530
1998#2,69150#2,92627
1997#2,97740#2,98125
1996#3,09338#2,59029
1995#2,73544#3,10022
1994#3,53631#3,46919
1993#5,67316#5,36010
1992#7,06712#5,6609
1991——
1990——
1989——
1988——
1987——
1986——
1985——
1984——
1983——
1982——
1981——
1980——
1979——
1978——
1977——
1976——
1975——
1974——
1973——
1972——
1971——
1970——
1969——
1968——
1967——
1966——
1965——
1964——
1963——
1962——
1961——
1960——
1959——
1958——
1957——
1956——
1955——
1954——
1953——
1952——
1951——
1950——
1949——
1948——
1947——
1946——
1945——
1944——
1943——
1942——
1941——
1940——
1939——
1938——
1937——
1936——
1935——
1934——
1933——
1932——
1931——
1930——
1929——
1928——
1927——
1926——
1925——
1924——
1923——
1922——
1921——
1920——
1919——
1918——
1917——
1916——
1915——
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1992

The first year at least five girls were named Scout! It came in at #7,067, and was given to 12 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1992–1993, when fewer than 17 girls a year got the name.

Where Scout is popular in 2004

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,139 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 22,883 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedHITexas: #1,601 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 13,273 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Scout, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Texas#1,601 · 1 in 13,273
  2. California#2,139 · 1 in 22,883

Best ever in a state: #85 in Vermont, 2021.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Texas#1,601121 in 13,273
California#2,139101 in 22,883
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Scout
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 71 spots since 2024 (#924 → #995)
  • 124 spots since 2020 (#871 → #995)
  • 109 spots since 2015 (#1,104 → #995)
  • Biggest jump: 171 spots in 2020 (#1,042 → #871)
  • Biggest drop: 133 spots in 2023 (#689 → #822)
Rise & fade · girls
30 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1992
  • Peaked 2022 at #689 (425 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 2020–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,859
  • Highest: 1 in 3,859 girls born in 2022 were named Scout (0.03%)
  • Latest: 1 in 6,328 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 40.9% of all girls named Scout (2,098) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1990s276#2,691 (1998)#3,838
2000s811#1,908 (2007)#2,323
2010s2,098#964 (2018)#1,212
2020s1,944#689 (2022)#855

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Scout in 2004

girls
#2,117
85 births · 1 in 21,603 girls
boys
#2,531
43 births · 1 in 46,162 boys

Top girls' names in 2004

  1. #1Emily25,042
  2. #2Emma21,625
  3. #3Madison20,628
  4. #4Olivia16,108
  5. #5Hannah15,614
  6. #6Abigail15,436
  7. #7Isabella15,021
  8. #8Ashley14,377
  9. #9Samantha13,786
  10. #10Elizabeth13,577
  11. #2,117Scout85

Top boys' names in 2004

  1. #1Jacob27,911
  2. #2Michael25,470
  3. #3Joshua24,214
  4. #4Matthew22,882
  5. #5Ethan22,210
  6. #6Andrew21,717
  7. #7Daniel21,018
  8. #8William20,237
  9. #9Joseph20,147
  10. #10Christopher19,636
  11. #2,531Scout43
More about 2004

girls

1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 21,603 of them was named Scout, which outranked 88.8% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Scout
  1. #2,100Sunshine86
  2. #2,100Taylar86
  3. #2,100Ysabella86
  4. #2,117Scout85
  5. #2,117Abrielle85
  6. #2,117Akasha85
  7. #2,117Ellianna85
  8. #2,135Angelika84
  9. #2,135Clarisa84
  10. #2,135Elicia84

Tied with 17 names at #2,117; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2003
Risers
  1. ↑ 948Rubi#1,561 → #613
  2. ↑ 607Kaydence#984 → #377
  3. ↑ 548Marin#1,383 → #835
  4. ↑ 543Diya#1,416 → #873
  5. ↑ 479Kadence#869 → #390
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,607Arly#949 → #2,556
  2. ↓ 433Shakira#747 → #1,180
  3. ↓ 414Anais#990 → #1,404
  4. ↓ 365Lisbeth#742 → #1,107
  5. ↓ 274Reanna#990 → #1,264

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,984,979 boys got a published name in 2004; 1 in 46,162 of them was named Scout, which outranked 80.9% of the 13,228 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Scout
  1. #2,489Reymundo44
  2. #2,489Shakur44
  3. #2,489Sir44
  4. #2,531Scout43
  5. #2,531Amiri43
  6. #2,531Azriel43
  7. #2,531Brayson43
  8. #2,569Aamir42
  9. #2,569Amado42
  10. #2,569Amaury42

Tied with 37 names at #2,531; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2003
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,308Koda#2,238 → #930
  2. ↑ 1,190Tayshaun#2,153 → #963
  3. ↑ 1,006Kanye#1,492 → #486
  4. ↑ 910Kyan#1,497 → #587
  5. ↑ 814Jaidyn#1,630 → #816
Fallers
  1. ↓ 455Jahiem#873 → #1,328
  2. ↓ 325Ervin#942 → #1,267
  3. ↓ 323Jahir#809 → #1,132
  4. ↓ 282Jaheim#457 → #739
  5. ↓ 270Sabastian#946 → #1,216

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2004 →