Seena
- #13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- Last seen for boys in 2006 at #10,662
- Given to girls 86.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1929 · 27 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 645since 1917
Seena over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 | — | |
| 2018 | #13,793 | 6 | — | |
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | — | |
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | — | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | #11,356 | 5 | |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | — | |
| 2002 | — | #7,055 | 9 | |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #9,631 | 5 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #6,100 | 9 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | — | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | — | #7,638 | 6 | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | — | #8,117 | 5 | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | — | #6,951 | 5 | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #5,785 | 6 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | — | |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,920 | 11 | — | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,393 | 10 | — | |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,742 | 11 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #3,249 | 9 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 | — | |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | — | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,831 | 10 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,750 | 20 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,487 | 27 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,541 | 27 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,559 | 28 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,589 | 27 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,700 | 25 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,872 | 22 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,732 | 12 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | — | |
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | — | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | — | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1917
The first year at least five girls were named Seena! It came in at #4,594, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1918, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Seena is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Seena in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Seena
Momentum · girls
Brand new
Rise & fade · girls
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1917
- Peaked 1929 at #1,487 (27 births)
- Births halved by 1932, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 41,354
- Highest: 1 in 41,354 girls born in 1929 were named Seena (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 29.1% of all girls named Seena (188) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2009
- Mostly boys until 2008, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 11 | #4,251 (1919) | #4,423 |
| 1920s | 188 | #1,487 (1929) | #2,093 |
| 1930s | 73 | #1,750 (1931) | #2,991 |
| 1940s | 85 | #2,482 (1946) | #3,368 |
| 1950s | 44 | #2,652 (1950) | #4,852 |
| 1960s | 66 | #3,920 (1960) | #5,470 |
| 1970s | 37 | #5,480 (1972) | #8,122 |
| 1980s | 38 | #8,047 (1983) | #9,331 |
| 1990s | 42 | #8,079 (1995) | #12,437 |
| 2000s | 32 | #10,102 (2001) | #14,042 |
| 2010s | 23 | #12,713 (2017) | #14,565 |
| 2020s | 6 | #13,208 (2025) | #13,208 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Seena ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: