Shaquita
- Last seen for girls in 2005 at #16,462
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
- Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1986 · 178 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,391since 1970
Shaquita over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Shaquita has never cracked the top 900 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | — | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | — | |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | — | |
| 2001 | #9,351 | 10 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | — | |
| 1999 | #5,039 | 21 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,492 | 24 | — | |
| 1997 | #4,007 | 27 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,006 | 68 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,634 | 92 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,228 | 141 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,254 | 138 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,077 | 168 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,066 | 166 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,060 | 160 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #1,092 | 144 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,033 | 150 | — | |
| 1986 | #906 | 178 | — | |
| 1985 | #907 | 174 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,021 | 139 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,159 | 114 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,965 | 53 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,085 | 49 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,735 | 64 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,998 | 51 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,191 | 42 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,002 | 26 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,728 | 28 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,232 | 37 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,008 | 23 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1970
The first year at least five girls were named Shaquita! It came in at #7,995, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1970–1971, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Shaquita is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Shaquita in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Shaquita
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2005
- Biggest jump: 114 spots in 1985
- Biggest drop: 127 spots in 1987
Rise & fade · girls
16 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1970
- Peaked 1986 at #906 (178 births)
- Births halved by 1995, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 1985–1986
Share of babies · girls
1 in 9,638
- Highest: 1 in 9,638 girls born in 1986 were named Shaquita (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 369,568 girls born in 2005 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 51.2% of all girls named Shaquita (1,225) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 226 | #1,998 (1979) | #4,058 |
| 1980s | 1,225 | #906 (1986) | #1,296 |
| 1990s | 892 | #1,066 (1990) | #2,443 |
| 2000s | 48 | #7,580 (2000) | #12,460 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Shaquita ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: