Sharman
Last seen for girls in 1983 at #8,047 · Last seen for boys in 1976 at #5,587
Given to girls 97.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1950 · 160 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,014since 1947
Sharman over time
Rank among girls' names. Sharman has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | — | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #6,484 | 8 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,362 | 13 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,177 | 20 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,477 | 30 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #2,450 | 30 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,296 | 31 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,126 | 32 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,039 | 33 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #2,519 | 23 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | — | |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,460 | 14 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,688 | 12 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,209 | 26 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,754 | 38 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,738 | 37 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,108 | 26 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,739 | 35 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,473 | 44 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,195 | 63 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,063 | 76 | — | |
| 1950 | #668 | 160 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1949 | #771 | 126 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,708 | 30 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | #3,959 | 5 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Sharman! It came in at #4,007, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1978, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Sharman is popular in 1951
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#428 · 1 in 5,889
- Ohio#460 · 1 in 7,027
- California#934 · 1 in 17,274
- New York#954 · 1 in 24,953
Best ever in a state: #253 in Oregon, 1949.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #428 | 5 | 1 in 5,889 |
| Ohio | #460 | 13 | 1 in 7,027 |
| California | #934 | 7 | 1 in 17,274 |
| New York | #954 | 6 | 1 in 24,953 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sharman
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1983
- Biggest jump: 937 spots in 1949 (#1,708 → #771)
- Biggest drop: 395 spots in 1951 (#668 → #1,063)
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 1950 at #668 (160 births)
- Births halved by 1951, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · run 1949–1950
- Highest: 1 in 10,707 girls born in 1950 were named Sharman (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 238,658 girls born in 1983 (0.00%)
- 50.8% of all girls named Sharman (515) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 164 | #771 (1949) | #2,162 |
| 1950s | 515 | #668 (1950) | #1,798 |
| 1960s | 183 | #2,039 (1967) | #3,391 |
| 1970s | 138 | #2,450 (1970) | #5,014 |
| 1980s | 14 | #8,047 (1983) | #8,113 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Sharman in 1951
Top girls' names in 1951
More about 1951
girls
1,800,859 girls got a published name in 1951; 1 in 23,696 of them was named Sharman, which outranked 82.9% of the 6,213 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,057Hellen77
- #1,057Lucile77
- #1,057Noemi77
- #1,063Sharman76
- #1,063Arline76
- #1,063Edythe76
- #1,063Gearldine76
- #1,068Ardith75
- #1,068Carmel75
- #1,068Ellyn75
Tied with 4 names at #1,063; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.