Sierra
- #614 for girls in 2025, 476 births
- Last seen for boys in 2006 at #12,055
- Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 5,715 births
- Debut · girls
- 32 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 12 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 100,597since 1940
Sierra over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #614 | 476 | — | |
| 2024 | #593 | 508 | — | |
| 2023 | #566 | 525 | — | |
| 2022 | #551 | 552 | — | |
| 2021 | #508 | 612 | — | |
| 2020 | #531 | 568 | — | |
| 2019 | #497 | 630 | — | |
| 2018 | #452 | 699 | — | |
| 2017 | #449 | 704 | — | |
| 2016 | #424 | 771 | — | |
| 2015 | #404 | 800 | — | |
| 2014 | #350 | 949 | — | |
| 2013 | #342 | 945 | — | |
| 2012 | #278 | 1,170 | — | |
| 2011 | #278 | 1,149 | — | |
| 2010 | #214 | 1,455 | — | |
| 2009 | #196 | 1,676 | — | |
| 2008 | #175 | 1,903 | — | |
| 2007 | #168 | 2,114 | — | |
| 2006 | #140 | 2,466 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #105 | 3,049 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #92 | 3,520 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #73 | 4,242 | #6,258 | 11 |
| 2002 | #62 | 4,807 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #55 | 5,237 | #8,339 | 7 |
| 2000 | #53 | 5,520 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #49 | 5,715 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #51 | 5,841 | #5,159 | 12 |
| 1997 | #56 | 5,688 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #62 | 5,487 | #4,878 | 12 |
| 1995 | #60 | 5,495 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #71 | 4,853 | #3,596 | 18 |
| 1993 | #91 | 3,473 | #6,228 | 8 |
| 1992 | #129 | 2,614 | #6,128 | 8 |
| 1991 | #138 | 2,302 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #141 | 2,170 | #4,673 | 11 |
| 1989 | #155 | 1,863 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #181 | 1,550 | #4,450 | 10 |
| 1987 | #173 | 1,620 | #4,968 | 8 |
| 1986 | #169 | 1,610 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #216 | 1,198 | #4,698 | 8 |
| 1984 | #715 | 231 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | #804 | 193 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #780 | 210 | — | |
| 1981 | #835 | 187 | #4,509 | 8 |
| 1980 | #845 | 184 | — | |
| 1979 | #923 | 159 | — | |
| 1978 | #903 | 158 | #2,799 | 15 |
| 1977 | #1,004 | 134 | #3,606 | 10 |
| 1976 | #1,237 | 91 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #1,381 | 76 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #1,630 | 57 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,979 | 41 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,820 | 24 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,938 | 23 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,211 | 16 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | — | |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #3,137 | 11 | — | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,339 | 14 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,994 | 19 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,537 | 13 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,610 | 24 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,313 | 32 | — | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Sierra! It came in at #1,313, and was given to 32 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1949–1953, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Sierra is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#182 · 1 in 584
- South Dakota#188 · 1 in 509
- California#259 · 1 in 1,254
- Nevada#264 · 1 in 920
- Idaho#308 · 1 in 1,023
Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 1999.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #182 | 8 | 1 in 584 |
| South Dakota | #188 | 6 | 1 in 509 |
| California | #259 | 129 | 1 in 1,254 |
| Nevada | #264 | 10 | 1 in 920 |
| Idaho | #308 | 7 | 1 in 1,023 |
| Utah | #330 | 13 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Connecticut | #350 | 8 | 1 in 1,438 |
| Nebraska | #396 | 5 | 1 in 1,419 |
| Oregon | #396 | 9 | 1 in 1,450 |
| Minnesota | #397 | 13 | 1 in 1,652 |
| Iowa | #437 | 7 | 1 in 1,682 |
| Colorado | #497 | 11 | 1 in 2,121 |
| Wisconsin | #518 | 9 | 1 in 2,251 |
| Virginia | #520 | 15 | 1 in 2,249 |
| Massachusetts | #564 | 9 | 1 in 2,670 |
| Pennsylvania | #647 | 15 | 1 in 3,113 |
| New York | #679 | 24 | 1 in 3,264 |
| North Carolina | #729 | 13 | 1 in 3,576 |
| Washington | #732 | 8 | 1 in 3,608 |
| Florida | #735 | 22 | 1 in 3,944 |
| Michigan | #787 | 9 | 1 in 3,970 |
| New Jersey | #846 | 8 | 1 in 4,438 |
| Indiana | #916 | 6 | 1 in 4,651 |
| Texas | #949 | 30 | 1 in 5,351 |
| Ohio | #959 | 9 | 1 in 5,252 |
| Illinois | #1,014 | 8 | 1 in 5,541 |
| Georgia | #1,213 | 7 | 1 in 6,458 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sierra
- 83 spots since 2020 (#531 → #614)
- Biggest jump: 499 spots in 1985
- Biggest drop: 64 spots in 2011
- Debuted 1940
- Peaked 1999 at #49 (5,715 births)
- Births halved by 2006, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 12 yrs · run 1993–2004
- Top 1,000: 48 yrs · run 1978–2025
- Highest: 1 in 303 girls born in 1998 were named Sierra (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,377 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #49 in 1999, was only 1 in 310 (0.32%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 43.4% of all girls named Sierra (43,638) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 144 | #1,313 (1940) | #2,616 |
| 1950s | 54 | #4,278 (1954) | #4,920 |
| 1960s | 81 | #3,211 (1967) | #4,893 |
| 1970s | 787 | #903 (1978) | #1,769 |
| 1980s | 8,846 | #155 (1989) | #487 |
| 1990s | 43,638 | #49 (1999) | #85 |
| 2000s | 34,534 | #53 (2000) | #112 |
| 2010s | 9,272 | #214 (2010) | #369 |
| 2020s | 3,241 | #508 (2021) | #561 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Sierra ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: