Simon

Last seen for girls in 2019 at #13,799 · #230 for boys in 2025, 1,529 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1886 · 97 births
Debut · boys
88 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
70,283
since 1880

Simon over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Simon has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201942peak #139, 1886boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#2301,529
2024—#2511,412
2023—#2481,410
2022—#2411,457
2021—#2481,429
2020—#2491,409
2019#13,7996#2571,418
2018—#2531,454
2017—#2631,386
2016—#2441,558
2015#11,8358#2351,645
2014—#2311,619
2013—#2281,616
2012#10,42910#2521,453
2011—#2541,363
2010—#2501,368
2009—#2611,335
2008#15,4056#2591,350
2007—#2581,352
2006#17,1685#2391,418
2005—#2501,315
2004—#2531,309
2003—#2351,422
2002—#2421,398
2001#15,3525#2571,276
2000—#2631,253
1999—#2671,128
1998#9,2609#300950
1997—#334781
1996—#341728
1995#13,3865#369648
1994#8,12210#356678
1993#10,5887#352668
1992#8,7349#348688
1991#9,3368#372619
1990—#372626
1989#12,3625#383575
1988#7,11110#354587
1987#7,9878#343581
1986—#328606
1985—#338564
1984—#302655
1983—#373467
1982#9,2376#387436
1981—#374464
1980#9,0956#372460
1979—#365479
1978—#421349
1977—#412366
1976—#385399
1975—#420342
1974—#432333
1973#7,4356#419347
1972—#432340
1971#7,3886#447338
1970—#481281
1969—#494244
1968—#478251
1967—#503224
1966—#539200
1965#6,5395#557190
1964—#525221
1963—#548211
1962—#551204
1961—#526227
1960—#531222
1959—#550202
1958—#551197
1957—#536209
1956—#520210
1955—#491224
1954—#482224
1953—#492204
1952—#464230
1951—#483195
1950—#443225
1949—#466199
1948—#449220
1947#5,2955#440231
1946—#438209
1945—#444179
1944—#446185
1943—#387250
1942—#423210
1941—#423192
1940—#418193
1939—#395206
1938—#375224
1937—#400195
1936—#416177
1935—#384200
1934—#393197
1933#4,2185#389196
1932—#383215
1931—#369233
1930—#330281
1929—#343267
1928—#348267
1927—#344283
1926—#342286
1925—#310337
1924—#318330
1923—#321328
1922—#291376
1921#5,0995#282394
1920—#310342
1919—#276363
1918—#275374
1917—#268358
1916—#272352
1915—#270326
1914—#261274
1913#2,8276#246238
1912—#230226
1911—#214137
1910—#197132
1909—#22494
1908—#22585
1907—#22979
1906—#21383
1905—#21380
1904—#21176
1903—#20177
1902—#24258
1901—#19772
1900—#23574
1899—#19768
1898—#21168
1897—#19279
1896—#19285
1895—#23457
1894—#17387
1893—#20171
1892—#19280
1891—#19863
1890—#18373
1889—#19069
1888—#141109
1887—#18567
1886—#13997
1885—#16083
1884—#16385
1883—#14390
1882—#17378
1881—#16375
1880—#15488
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Simon was already there! It came in at #154, and was given to 88 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1895–1908, when fewer than 86 boys a year got the name.

Where Simon is popular in 1942

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMNIllinois: #517 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 14,782 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedWIMichigan: #451 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 11,581 boysMINew York: #291 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 5,359 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #393 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 10,357 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #410 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 6,639 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #346 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,164 boysNCSouth Carolina: #231 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 1,830 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #294 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 2,181 boysLAMississippi: #304 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,965 boysMSAlabama: #359 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,086 boysALGeorgia: #391 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 5,043 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Simon, so not publishedHITexas: #241 for boys · 46 births · 1 in 1,532 boysTXFlorida: #296 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,101 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. South Carolina#231 · 1 in 1,830
  2. Texas#241 · 1 in 1,532
  3. New York#291 · 1 in 5,359
  4. Louisiana#294 · 1 in 2,181
  5. Florida#296 · 1 in 3,101

Best ever in a state: #16 in Alaska, 1918.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#231131 in 1,830
Texas#241461 in 1,532
New York#291221 in 5,359
Louisiana#294121 in 2,181
Florida#29661 in 3,101
Mississippi#30481 in 2,965
North Carolina#346101 in 4,164
Alabama#35981 in 4,086
Georgia#39171 in 5,043
Pennsylvania#39391 in 10,357
California#410111 in 6,639
Michigan#45151 in 11,581
Illinois#51751 in 14,782
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Simon
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 21 spots since 2024 (#251 → #230)
  • 19 spots since 2020 (#249 → #230)
  • 5 spots since 2015 (#235 → #230)
  • Biggest jump: 71 spots in 1984 (#373 → #302)
  • Biggest drop: 61 spots in 1895 (#173 → #234)
Rise & fade · boys
6 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1886 at #139 (97 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,109
  • Highest: 1 in 1,109 boys born in 1888 were named Simon (0.09%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,117 boys born in 2025 (0.09%)
  • Its best rank, #139 in 1886, was only 1 in 1,142 (0.09%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 21.2% of all boys named Simon (14,880) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s841#139 (1886)#161
1890s731#173 (1894)#197
1900s778#197 (1901)#219
1910s2,780#197 (1910)#251
1920s3,210#282 (1921)#321
1930s2,124#330 (1930)#383
1940s2,068#387 (1943)#433
1950s2,120#443 (1950)#501
1960s2,194#478 (1968)#525
1970s3,574#365 (1979)#421
1980s5,395#302 (1984)#355
1990s7,514#267 (1999)#341
2000s13,428#235 (2003)#252
2010s14,880#228 (2013)#247
2020s8,646#230 (2025)#245

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Simon in 1942

boys
#423
210 births · 1 in 6,577 boys

Top boys' names in 1942

  1. #1James77,182
  2. #2Robert71,845
  3. #3John66,043
  4. #4William54,890
  5. #5Richard43,593
  6. #6David35,905
  7. #7Charles35,854
  8. #8Thomas31,100
  9. #9Ronald27,138
  10. #10Donald23,955
  11. #423Simon210
More about 1942

boys

1,381,161 boys got a published name in 1942; 1 in 6,577 of them was named Simon, which outranked 89.5% of the 4,044 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Simon
  1. #420Elton215
  2. #421Van214
  3. #422Harrison211
  4. #423Simon210
  5. #423Linwood210
  6. #425Cary207
  7. #426Wiley206
  8. #427Odell205

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1941
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,993Macarthur#3,505 → #512
  2. ↑ 1,546Mcarthur#1,903 → #357
  3. ↑ 655Collin#1,588 → #933
  4. ↑ 514Delmas#1,254 → #740
  5. ↑ 390Colin#713 → #323
Fallers
  1. ↓ 525Otho#971 → #1,496
  2. ↓ 440Florian#918 → #1,358
  3. ↓ 421Martha#960 → #1,381
  4. ↓ 407Watson#951 → #1,358
  5. ↓ 371Gaylen#987 → #1,358

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1942 →