Sloane
- #141 for girls in 2025, 2,077 births
- #6,803 for boys in 2025, 12 births
- Given to girls 98.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 2,056 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 24,670since 1958
Sloane over time
Rank among girls' names. Sloane has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #141 | 2,077 | #6,803 | 12 |
| 2024 | #153 | 1,941 | #4,890 | 20 |
| 2023 | #151 | 1,897 | #4,343 | 24 |
| 2022 | #140 | 2,056 | #5,215 | 18 |
| 2021 | #144 | 1,920 | #4,628 | 21 |
| 2020 | #181 | 1,584 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #192 | 1,547 | #5,153 | 18 |
| 2018 | #181 | 1,631 | #6,703 | 12 |
| 2017 | #221 | 1,407 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #266 | 1,191 | #5,318 | 17 |
| 2015 | #327 | 998 | — | |
| 2014 | #369 | 882 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #405 | 756 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #478 | 640 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #510 | 576 | #5,675 | 15 |
| 2010 | #592 | 497 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #884 | 310 | #9,864 | 7 |
| 2008 | #1,002 | 264 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #1,172 | 217 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #1,390 | 163 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,657 | 120 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #1,404 | 148 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,947 | 93 | #6,715 | 10 |
| 2002 | #1,771 | 102 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #1,726 | 104 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #1,985 | 84 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #1,621 | 103 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #1,646 | 98 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,116 | 66 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,964 | 72 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,684 | 87 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #2,142 | 63 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #2,033 | 68 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #1,643 | 92 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #1,979 | 70 | #4,760 | 11 |
| 1990 | #2,029 | 66 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #2,093 | 55 | #6,426 | 6 |
| 1987 | #2,065 | 53 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,054 | 30 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #2,804 | 33 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,737 | 15 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #4,347 | 17 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 | #5,468 | 6 |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #3,838 | 10 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | — | |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,905 | 12 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,914 | 23 | #4,505 | 6 |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #3,166 | 21 | #4,375 | 6 |
| 1970 | #1,986 | 42 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #2,058 | 37 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,057 | 18 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #4,053 | 11 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,586 | 22 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,605 | 22 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,675 | 22 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,306 | 27 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Sloane! It came in at #4,890, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1959–1960, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Sloane is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#57 · 1 in 208
- Colorado#58 · 1 in 295
- Utah#77 · 1 in 328
- Massachusetts#80 · 1 in 359
- Kansas#82 · 1 in 347
Best ever in a state: #19 in District of Columbia, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #57 | 15 | 1 in 208 |
| Colorado | #58 | 79 | 1 in 295 |
| Utah | #77 | 52 | 1 in 328 |
| Massachusetts | #80 | 67 | 1 in 359 |
| Kansas | #82 | 34 | 1 in 347 |
| Illinois | #87 | 95 | 1 in 467 |
| Pennsylvania | #89 | 104 | 1 in 449 |
| North Dakota | #91 | 10 | 1 in 270 |
| New Jersey | #92 | 75 | 1 in 473 |
| Washington | #94 | 65 | 1 in 444 |
| Nebraska | #95 | 21 | 1 in 338 |
| New Hampshire | #95 | 12 | 1 in 316 |
| South Dakota | #97 | 10 | 1 in 305 |
| Missouri | #111 | 53 | 1 in 458 |
| Maryland | #114 | 38 | 1 in 526 |
| Virginia | #114 | 63 | 1 in 536 |
| Connecticut | #115 | 25 | 1 in 460 |
| Wisconsin | #115 | 43 | 1 in 471 |
| Ohio | #119 | 89 | 1 in 531 |
| Rhode Island | #120 | 7 | 1 in 350 |
| Michigan | #125 | 66 | 1 in 541 |
| Iowa | #126 | 25 | 1 in 471 |
| Oregon | #131 | 25 | 1 in 522 |
| Idaho | #133 | 15 | 1 in 478 |
| New York | #134 | 120 | 1 in 653 |
| North Carolina | #137 | 72 | 1 in 646 |
| Indiana | #145 | 46 | 1 in 607 |
| District of Columbia | #150 | 5 | 1 in 404 |
| Arkansas | #153 | 19 | 1 in 558 |
| Tennessee | #155 | 49 | 1 in 655 |
| California | #177 | 183 | 1 in 884 |
| Minnesota | #180 | 30 | 1 in 716 |
| Arizona | #183 | 36 | 1 in 784 |
| Texas | #185 | 178 | 1 in 902 |
| Florida | #203 | 92 | 1 in 943 |
| Kentucky | #208 | 22 | 1 in 784 |
| Oklahoma | #225 | 17 | 1 in 869 |
| Nevada | #235 | 11 | 1 in 836 |
| South Carolina | #278 | 18 | 1 in 1,016 |
| Alabama | #297 | 16 | 1 in 1,145 |
| Georgia | #305 | 34 | 1 in 1,330 |
| Louisiana | #322 | 14 | 1 in 1,169 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sloane
- 40 spots since 2020 (#181 → #141)
- Biggest jump: 292 spots in 2010
- Biggest drop: 11 spots in 2019
- Debuted 1958
- Peaked 2022 at #140 (2,056 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 2009–2025
- Highest: 1 in 774 girls born in 2025 were named Sloane (0.13%)
- Its best rank, #140 in 2022, was only 1 in 798 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 46.5% of all girls named Sloane (11,475) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 7 | #4,890 (1958) | #4,890 |
| 1960s | 175 | #2,058 (1969) | #3,232 |
| 1970s | 193 | #1,986 (1970) | #3,843 |
| 1980s | 305 | #1,998 (1989) | #3,831 |
| 1990s | 785 | #1,621 (1999) | #1,886 |
| 2000s | 1,605 | #884 (2009) | #1,494 |
| 2010s | 10,125 | #181 (2018) | #354 |
| 2020s | 11,475 | #140 (2022) | #152 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Sloane ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: