Stephen
Last seen for girls in 2007 at #15,491 · #383 for boys in 2025, 829 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1951 · 22,474 births
- Debut · boys
- 176 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 95 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 864,739since 1880
Stephen over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #383 | 829 | |
| 2024 | — | #374 | 870 | |
| 2023 | — | #363 | 898 | |
| 2022 | — | #358 | 919 | |
| 2021 | — | #339 | 958 | |
| 2020 | — | #322 | 1,024 | |
| 2019 | — | #310 | 1,095 | |
| 2018 | — | #283 | 1,246 | |
| 2017 | — | #270 | 1,334 | |
| 2016 | — | #265 | 1,379 | |
| 2015 | — | #246 | 1,497 | |
| 2014 | — | #257 | 1,452 | |
| 2013 | — | #252 | 1,452 | |
| 2012 | — | #225 | 1,568 | |
| 2011 | — | #228 | 1,579 | |
| 2010 | — | #201 | 1,820 | |
| 2009 | — | #199 | 1,920 | |
| 2008 | — | #191 | 2,092 | |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #172 | 2,376 |
| 2006 | — | #164 | 2,552 | |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | #143 | 2,745 |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #140 | 2,851 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #128 | 3,142 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #114 | 3,349 |
| 2001 | — | #102 | 3,738 | |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | #95 | 4,137 |
| 1999 | #6,836 | 14 | #85 | 4,543 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #78 | 5,013 |
| 1997 | #6,483 | 14 | #68 | 5,414 |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 | #59 | 6,008 |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | #57 | 6,556 |
| 1994 | #5,445 | 17 | #49 | 7,481 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #47 | 8,369 |
| 1992 | #2,830 | 42 | #45 | 9,308 |
| 1991 | #2,935 | 39 | #41 | 10,525 |
| 1990 | #3,078 | 36 | #39 | 11,943 |
| 1989 | #2,072 | 60 | #40 | 11,736 |
| 1988 | #1,839 | 67 | #40 | 11,607 |
| 1987 | #1,630 | 75 | #38 | 11,550 |
| 1986 | #1,484 | 84 | #36 | 11,877 |
| 1985 | #1,350 | 97 | #36 | 12,210 |
| 1984 | #1,511 | 75 | #35 | 12,096 |
| 1983 | #1,463 | 79 | #35 | 11,564 |
| 1982 | #1,621 | 71 | #38 | 10,627 |
| 1981 | #1,767 | 63 | #39 | 10,302 |
| 1980 | #1,692 | 67 | #40 | 10,062 |
| 1979 | #1,731 | 63 | #40 | 9,903 |
| 1978 | #1,397 | 83 | #37 | 9,854 |
| 1977 | #1,701 | 61 | #38 | 9,635 |
| 1976 | #1,551 | 65 | #37 | 9,727 |
| 1975 | #1,459 | 70 | #34 | 9,732 |
| 1974 | #1,760 | 51 | #35 | 10,101 |
| 1973 | #1,399 | 70 | #32 | 9,955 |
| 1972 | #1,749 | 50 | #29 | 11,037 |
| 1971 | #1,427 | 73 | #27 | 13,102 |
| 1970 | #1,505 | 66 | #27 | 14,758 |
| 1969 | #1,517 | 61 | #27 | 15,090 |
| 1968 | #1,418 | 63 | #27 | 14,761 |
| 1967 | #1,281 | 71 | #26 | 15,087 |
| 1966 | #1,515 | 54 | #26 | 14,742 |
| 1965 | #1,993 | 34 | #28 | 14,648 |
| 1964 | #1,892 | 39 | #29 | 14,968 |
| 1963 | #1,839 | 40 | #29 | 14,992 |
| 1962 | #2,163 | 30 | #28 | 15,616 |
| 1961 | #1,955 | 35 | #27 | 16,069 |
| 1960 | #1,580 | 50 | #27 | 16,267 |
| 1959 | #2,152 | 28 | #28 | 16,504 |
| 1958 | #1,557 | 47 | #26 | 17,962 |
| 1957 | #1,728 | 39 | #24 | 19,726 |
| 1956 | #1,796 | 35 | #23 | 21,204 |
| 1955 | #1,803 | 34 | #21 | 22,155 |
| 1954 | #2,122 | 25 | #20 | 21,878 |
| 1953 | #1,622 | 37 | #21 | 21,807 |
| 1952 | #1,934 | 27 | #21 | 23,055 |
| 1951 | #1,339 | 48 | #19 | 22,474 |
| 1950 | #1,679 | 31 | #19 | 20,511 |
| 1949 | #1,543 | 36 | #19 | 20,488 |
| 1948 | #1,669 | 31 | #20 | 17,061 |
| 1947 | #2,200 | 20 | #21 | 15,328 |
| 1946 | #1,481 | 35 | #24 | 11,832 |
| 1945 | #1,699 | 24 | #26 | 8,641 |
| 1944 | #1,967 | 19 | #28 | 7,793 |
| 1943 | #1,994 | 19 | #29 | 7,932 |
| 1942 | #1,760 | 23 | #32 | 7,503 |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 | #41 | 5,811 |
| 1940 | #2,297 | 13 | #49 | 4,423 |
| 1939 | #3,145 | 8 | #65 | 3,176 |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | #74 | 2,726 |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | #92 | 2,133 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #99 | 1,862 |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 | #113 | 1,650 |
| 1934 | — | #121 | 1,424 | |
| 1933 | #2,688 | 10 | #126 | 1,321 |
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 | #124 | 1,389 |
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 | #129 | 1,334 |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | #138 | 1,257 |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | #126 | 1,357 |
| 1928 | #2,954 | 10 | #130 | 1,335 |
| 1927 | #3,561 | 8 | #125 | 1,446 |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #130 | 1,335 |
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | #122 | 1,482 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #110 | 1,635 |
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | #109 | 1,605 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | #101 | 1,722 |
| 1921 | #3,666 | 8 | #97 | 1,868 |
| 1920 | — | #96 | 1,771 | |
| 1919 | #3,219 | 9 | #97 | 1,693 |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 | #96 | 1,843 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | #89 | 1,892 |
| 1916 | — | #87 | 1,877 | |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | #86 | 1,850 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #80 | 1,486 |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #86 | 1,097 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | #88 | 928 |
| 1911 | — | #83 | 486 | |
| 1910 | — | #95 | 350 | |
| 1909 | — | #90 | 314 | |
| 1908 | — | #94 | 280 | |
| 1907 | — | #94 | 273 | |
| 1906 | — | #102 | 207 | |
| 1905 | — | #93 | 246 | |
| 1904 | — | #117 | 178 | |
| 1903 | — | #96 | 200 | |
| 1902 | — | #94 | 210 | |
| 1901 | — | #108 | 158 | |
| 1900 | — | #127 | 181 | |
| 1899 | — | #97 | 178 | |
| 1898 | — | #98 | 195 | |
| 1897 | — | #94 | 194 | |
| 1896 | — | #113 | 164 | |
| 1895 | — | #103 | 179 | |
| 1894 | — | #103 | 174 | |
| 1893 | — | #101 | 175 | |
| 1892 | — | #104 | 178 | |
| 1891 | — | #106 | 140 | |
| 1890 | — | #107 | 156 | |
| 1889 | — | #101 | 164 | |
| 1888 | — | #98 | 187 | |
| 1887 | — | #91 | 165 | |
| 1886 | — | #89 | 181 | |
| 1885 | — | #93 | 158 | |
| 1884 | — | #93 | 165 | |
| 1883 | — | #97 | 140 | |
| 1882 | — | #81 | 201 | |
| 1881 | — | #88 | 147 | |
| 1880 | — | #84 | 176 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Stephen was already there! It came in at #84, and was given to 176 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1904, when fewer than 220 boys a year got the name.
Where Stephen is popular in 1979
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Rhode Island#25 · 1 in 74
- Delaware#28 · 1 in 88
- Maryland#28 · 1 in 114
- New Jersey#28 · 1 in 119
- Virginia#29 · 1 in 112
Best ever in a state: #7 in Maine, 1951.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #25 | 72 | 1 in 74 |
| Delaware | #28 | 42 | 1 in 88 |
| Maryland | #28 | 199 | 1 in 114 |
| New Jersey | #28 | 356 | 1 in 119 |
| Virginia | #29 | 297 | 1 in 112 |
| Georgia | #30 | 303 | 1 in 130 |
| Pennsylvania | #30 | 743 | 1 in 102 |
| South Carolina | #30 | 142 | 1 in 148 |
| Massachusetts | #31 | 364 | 1 in 93 |
| Tennessee | #31 | 249 | 1 in 132 |
| North Carolina | #32 | 260 | 1 in 144 |
| Connecticut | #33 | 159 | 1 in 109 |
| Florida | #33 | 385 | 1 in 142 |
| District of Columbia | #34 | 62 | 1 in 127 |
| Kentucky | #34 | 219 | 1 in 129 |
| Alabama | #35 | 171 | 1 in 158 |
| Mississippi | #35 | 113 | 1 in 167 |
| New York | #35 | 762 | 1 in 146 |
| West Virginia | #36 | 101 | 1 in 138 |
| New Hampshire | #37 | 44 | 1 in 129 |
| Maine | #38 | 61 | 1 in 117 |
| Missouri | #38 | 269 | 1 in 137 |
| Texas | #38 | 668 | 1 in 185 |
| Vermont | #38 | 28 | 1 in 110 |
| Arkansas | #40 | 96 | 1 in 166 |
| Michigan | #41 | 424 | 1 in 158 |
| Oklahoma | #41 | 136 | 1 in 157 |
| Arizona | #42 | 108 | 1 in 194 |
| Ohio | #42 | 467 | 1 in 172 |
| New Mexico | #43 | 55 | 1 in 186 |
| Colorado | #45 | 119 | 1 in 183 |
| Hawaii | #45 | 33 | 1 in 195 |
| Louisiana | #45 | 175 | 1 in 199 |
| Nevada | #45 | 28 | 1 in 177 |
| Illinois | #46 | 376 | 1 in 223 |
| Indiana | #47 | 209 | 1 in 196 |
| California | #49 | 802 | 1 in 224 |
| Utah | #49 | 99 | 1 in 192 |
| Washington | #51 | 140 | 1 in 212 |
| Kansas | #53 | 71 | 1 in 237 |
| Idaho | #56 | 38 | 1 in 222 |
| Oregon | #56 | 85 | 1 in 228 |
| Alaska | #58 | 16 | 1 in 221 |
| Minnesota | #64 | 108 | 1 in 288 |
| Iowa | #67 | 72 | 1 in 308 |
| Nebraska | #68 | 38 | 1 in 315 |
| Wisconsin | #73 | 92 | 1 in 375 |
| Montana | #74 | 19 | 1 in 306 |
| North Dakota | #88 | 13 | 1 in 425 |
| Wyoming | #107 | 6 | 1 in 594 |
| South Dakota | #109 | 9 | 1 in 591 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Stephen
- 9 spots since 2024 (#374 → #383)
- 61 spots since 2020 (#322 → #383)
- 137 spots since 2015 (#246 → #383)
- Biggest jump: 24 spots in 1905 (#117 → #93)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 1900 (#97 → #127)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1951 at #19 (22,474 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 95 yrs · run 1936–2000
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 84 boys born in 1951 were named Stephen (1.2%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,060 boys born in 2025 (0.05%)
- 24.0% of all boys named Stephen (207,276) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,684 | #81 (1882) | #92 |
| 1890s | 1,733 | #94 (1897) | #103 |
| 1900s | 2,247 | #90 (1909) | #102 |
| 1910s | 13,502 | #80 (1914) | #89 |
| 1920s | 15,556 | #96 (1920) | #115 |
| 1930s | 18,272 | #65 (1939) | #108 |
| 1940s | 106,812 | #19 (1949) | #29 |
| 1950s | 207,276 | #19 (1951) | #22 |
| 1960s | 152,240 | #26 (1967) | #27 |
| 1970s | 107,804 | #27 (1970) | #34 |
| 1980s | 113,631 | #35 (1984) | #38 |
| 1990s | 75,160 | #39 (1990) | #57 |
| 2000s | 28,902 | #95 (2000) | #145 |
| 2010s | 14,422 | #201 (2010) | #254 |
| 2020s | 5,498 | #322 (2020) | #357 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Stephen in 1979
Top girls' names in 1979
Top boys' names in 1979
More about 1979
girls
1,605,268 girls got a published name in 1979; 1 in 25,480 of them was named Stephen, which outranked 85.5% of the 11,972 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,712Shaquana64
- #1,712Tenesha64
- #1,712Torie64
- #1,731Stephen63
- #1,731Amee63
- #1,731Ammie63
- #1,731Calandra63
- #1,753Eloisa62
- #1,753Farah62
- #1,753Glenna62
Tied with 21 names at #1,731; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,721,536 boys got a published name in 1979; 1 in 174 of them was named Stephen, which outranked 99.4% of the 7,071 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.