Sterling
- #1,098 for girls in 2025, 218 births
- #345 for boys in 2025, 944 births
- Given to boys 91.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1895 · 35 births
- Debut · boys
- 17 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 37,474since 1880
Sterling over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,098 | 218 | #345 | 944 |
| 2024 | #1,114 | 219 | #370 | 885 |
| 2023 | #1,273 | 180 | #403 | 792 |
| 2022 | #1,362 | 171 | #397 | 803 |
| 2021 | #1,273 | 182 | #382 | 844 |
| 2020 | #1,678 | 122 | #399 | 768 |
| 2019 | #1,773 | 115 | #410 | 753 |
| 2018 | #1,663 | 126 | #409 | 783 |
| 2017 | #1,686 | 127 | #433 | 713 |
| 2016 | #1,636 | 133 | #458 | 671 |
| 2015 | #2,209 | 85 | #493 | 595 |
| 2014 | #2,027 | 97 | #507 | 552 |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | #582 | 441 |
| 2012 | #2,708 | 65 | #675 | 350 |
| 2011 | #2,725 | 64 | #737 | 307 |
| 2010 | #3,159 | 52 | #755 | 299 |
| 2009 | #3,460 | 47 | #898 | 231 |
| 2008 | #3,584 | 45 | #866 | 245 |
| 2007 | #3,848 | 41 | #800 | 269 |
| 2006 | #3,054 | 55 | #769 | 270 |
| 2005 | #3,730 | 39 | #742 | 272 |
| 2004 | #2,620 | 63 | #675 | 300 |
| 2003 | #2,840 | 54 | #631 | 325 |
| 2002 | #2,158 | 77 | #589 | 357 |
| 2001 | #2,700 | 55 | #545 | 395 |
| 2000 | #2,174 | 73 | #567 | 363 |
| 1999 | #2,567 | 55 | #528 | 392 |
| 1998 | #2,164 | 66 | #505 | 424 |
| 1997 | #2,874 | 42 | #493 | 428 |
| 1996 | #2,207 | 61 | #462 | 469 |
| 1995 | #2,421 | 53 | #446 | 511 |
| 1994 | #1,972 | 71 | #402 | 573 |
| 1993 | #1,865 | 76 | #437 | 504 |
| 1992 | #2,351 | 55 | #438 | 503 |
| 1991 | #2,519 | 49 | #463 | 454 |
| 1990 | #2,799 | 41 | #463 | 451 |
| 1989 | #3,165 | 33 | #486 | 389 |
| 1988 | #2,539 | 42 | #443 | 415 |
| 1987 | #2,972 | 32 | #490 | 326 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | #512 | 297 |
| 1985 | #3,983 | 20 | #527 | 275 |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 | #490 | 293 |
| 1983 | #3,242 | 25 | #507 | 276 |
| 1982 | #3,898 | 20 | #559 | 237 |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | #579 | 218 |
| 1980 | #4,517 | 16 | #548 | 242 |
| 1979 | #4,052 | 18 | #571 | 225 |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 | #555 | 226 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #573 | 214 |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | #591 | 189 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #596 | 183 |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | #575 | 195 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #570 | 194 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #589 | 183 |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #522 | 242 |
| 1970 | #4,038 | 14 | #546 | 221 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #508 | 234 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #483 | 246 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #511 | 216 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #490 | 239 |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #522 | 215 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #470 | 284 |
| 1963 | — | #464 | 288 | |
| 1962 | — | #470 | 288 | |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #504 | 249 |
| 1960 | — | #515 | 237 | |
| 1959 | — | #487 | 259 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #496 | 245 |
| 1957 | — | #497 | 246 | |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #455 | 279 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #455 | 267 |
| 1954 | — | #457 | 252 | |
| 1953 | — | #449 | 255 | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #440 | 255 |
| 1951 | — | #420 | 260 | |
| 1950 | — | #421 | 252 | |
| 1949 | #4,235 | 7 | #422 | 260 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #419 | 255 |
| 1947 | — | #409 | 281 | |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #417 | 232 |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #409 | 216 |
| 1944 | — | #416 | 211 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #422 | 217 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #377 | 258 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #413 | 200 |
| 1940 | — | #402 | 204 | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #428 | 177 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | #414 | 188 |
| 1937 | — | #439 | 166 | |
| 1936 | — | #392 | 194 | |
| 1935 | — | #411 | 179 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #405 | 186 |
| 1933 | — | #397 | 186 | |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #369 | 227 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | #404 | 193 |
| 1930 | — | #402 | 208 | |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #356 | 250 |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #392 | 229 |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 | #385 | 236 |
| 1926 | — | #371 | 246 | |
| 1925 | — | #384 | 241 | |
| 1924 | — | #356 | 280 | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 | #376 | 253 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 | #364 | 270 |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #372 | 269 |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | #373 | 259 |
| 1919 | — | #361 | 254 | |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #376 | 249 |
| 1917 | — | #383 | 218 | |
| 1916 | — | #390 | 202 | |
| 1915 | — | #372 | 209 | |
| 1914 | — | #385 | 151 | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #362 | 132 |
| 1912 | — | #384 | 100 | |
| 1911 | — | #420 | 47 | |
| 1910 | — | #383 | 46 | |
| 1909 | — | #339 | 47 | |
| 1908 | — | #341 | 44 | |
| 1907 | — | #351 | 39 | |
| 1906 | — | #378 | 32 | |
| 1905 | — | #384 | 30 | |
| 1904 | — | #351 | 33 | |
| 1903 | — | #346 | 31 | |
| 1902 | — | #360 | 30 | |
| 1901 | — | #347 | 28 | |
| 1900 | — | #354 | 38 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #385 | 26 | |
| 1897 | — | #375 | 25 | |
| 1896 | — | #424 | 21 | |
| 1895 | — | #305 | 35 | |
| 1894 | — | #521 | 15 | |
| 1893 | — | #317 | 30 | |
| 1892 | — | #394 | 23 | |
| 1891 | — | #340 | 25 | |
| 1890 | — | #489 | 15 | |
| 1889 | — | #482 | 15 | |
| 1888 | — | #369 | 25 | |
| 1887 | — | #377 | 19 | |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | #422 | 18 | |
| 1884 | — | #399 | 20 | |
| 1883 | — | #381 | 20 | |
| 1882 | — | #453 | 16 | |
| 1881 | — | #653 | 8 | |
| 1880 | — | #425 | 17 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Sterling was already there! It came in at #425, and was given to 17 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
Where Sterling is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- South Dakota#105 · 1 in 320
- Montana#127 · 1 in 376
- Nebraska#196 · 1 in 678
- Kentucky#213 · 1 in 790
- Washington#213 · 1 in 886
Best ever in a state: #69 in District of Columbia, 1915.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #105 | 12 | 1 in 320 |
| Montana | #127 | 10 | 1 in 376 |
| Nebraska | #196 | 13 | 1 in 678 |
| Kentucky | #213 | 26 | 1 in 790 |
| Washington | #213 | 37 | 1 in 886 |
| Hawaii | #214 | 5 | 1 in 584 |
| North Dakota | #226 | 5 | 1 in 671 |
| New Mexico | #236 | 8 | 1 in 813 |
| Kansas | #246 | 15 | 1 in 936 |
| Utah | #248 | 21 | 1 in 936 |
| Arizona | #250 | 32 | 1 in 1,023 |
| Idaho | #256 | 10 | 1 in 863 |
| Iowa | #257 | 15 | 1 in 922 |
| Wisconsin | #273 | 21 | 1 in 1,116 |
| Texas | #275 | 142 | 1 in 1,233 |
| Indiana | #279 | 29 | 1 in 1,092 |
| Mississippi | #281 | 11 | 1 in 985 |
| Oklahoma | #282 | 17 | 1 in 1,040 |
| Colorado | #293 | 22 | 1 in 1,221 |
| Michigan | #294 | 33 | 1 in 1,218 |
| Oregon | #295 | 14 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Arkansas | #305 | 11 | 1 in 1,144 |
| Minnesota | #314 | 19 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Virginia | #316 | 26 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Tennessee | #325 | 27 | 1 in 1,362 |
| Georgia | #337 | 36 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Missouri | #346 | 18 | 1 in 1,545 |
| North Carolina | #348 | 33 | 1 in 1,560 |
| Louisiana | #353 | 14 | 1 in 1,366 |
| Ohio | #363 | 30 | 1 in 1,751 |
| Florida | #403 | 48 | 1 in 1,990 |
| Maryland | #437 | 11 | 1 in 2,082 |
| South Carolina | #438 | 11 | 1 in 1,927 |
| Connecticut | #440 | 6 | 1 in 2,201 |
| Nevada | #443 | 6 | 1 in 1,882 |
| Alabama | #450 | 11 | 1 in 1,956 |
| Pennsylvania | #489 | 20 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Illinois | #568 | 16 | 1 in 3,097 |
| California | #572 | 52 | 1 in 3,375 |
| Massachusetts | #620 | 7 | 1 in 3,860 |
| New York | #661 | 22 | 1 in 3,837 |
| New Jersey | #1,022 | 5 | 1 in 7,953 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Sterling
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 54 spots since 2020 (#399 → #345)
- Biggest jump: 228 spots in 1887
- Biggest drop: 228 spots in 1881
Rise & fade · boys
15 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1895 at #305 (35 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,809
- Highest: 1 in 1,809 boys born in 2025 were named Sterling (0.06%)
- Its best rank, #305 in 1895, was only 1 in 3,354 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 14.6% of all boys named Sterling (5,464) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 168 | #369 (1888) | #457 |
| 1890s | 233 | #305 (1895) | #399 |
| 1900s | 352 | #339 (1909) | #355 |
| 1910s | 1,608 | #361 (1919) | #382 |
| 1920s | 2,533 | #356 (1924) | #373 |
| 1930s | 1,904 | #369 (1932) | #406 |
| 1940s | 2,334 | #377 (1942) | #411 |
| 1950s | 2,570 | #420 (1951) | #458 |
| 1960s | 2,496 | #464 (1963) | #494 |
| 1970s | 2,072 | #522 (1971) | #569 |
| 1980s | 2,968 | #443 (1988) | #514 |
| 1990s | 4,709 | #402 (1994) | #464 |
| 2000s | 3,027 | #545 (2001) | #708 |
| 2010s | 5,464 | #409 (2018) | #546 |
| 2020s | 5,036 | #345 (2025) | #383 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Sterling ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: