Steve
Last seen for girls in 1998 at #14,122 · #1,609 for boys in 2025, 105 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1959 · 11,068 births
- Debut · boys
- 52 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 241,224since 1880
Steve over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,609 | 105 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,685 | 99 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,539 | 114 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,479 | 122 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,365 | 135 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,250 | 148 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,202 | 159 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,151 | 167 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,056 | 189 | |
| 2016 | — | #993 | 205 | |
| 2015 | — | #939 | 224 | |
| 2014 | — | #863 | 256 | |
| 2013 | — | #872 | 242 | |
| 2012 | — | #754 | 303 | |
| 2011 | — | #707 | 324 | |
| 2010 | — | #785 | 279 | |
| 2009 | — | #611 | 415 | |
| 2008 | — | #595 | 422 | |
| 2007 | — | #573 | 448 | |
| 2006 | — | #535 | 472 | |
| 2005 | — | #518 | 475 | |
| 2004 | — | #505 | 484 | |
| 2003 | — | #443 | 563 | |
| 2002 | — | #451 | 545 | |
| 2001 | — | #401 | 624 | |
| 2000 | — | #393 | 649 | |
| 1999 | — | #390 | 660 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #390 | 635 |
| 1997 | — | #386 | 627 | |
| 1996 | — | #369 | 648 | |
| 1995 | — | #334 | 754 | |
| 1994 | — | #345 | 714 | |
| 1993 | #11,780 | 6 | #319 | 831 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #303 | 882 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #290 | 896 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #267 | 1,007 |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | #255 | 997 |
| 1988 | #4,015 | 22 | #248 | 949 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #233 | 1,004 |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | #235 | 989 |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #234 | 990 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #218 | 1,042 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #215 | 1,063 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #229 | 1,024 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #220 | 1,116 |
| 1980 | #5,912 | 11 | #201 | 1,218 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #193 | 1,254 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #193 | 1,236 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #182 | 1,270 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | #167 | 1,407 |
| 1975 | #3,950 | 16 | #170 | 1,383 |
| 1974 | #4,720 | 12 | #167 | 1,443 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #160 | 1,511 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | #143 | 1,845 |
| 1971 | #4,123 | 14 | #131 | 2,373 |
| 1970 | #3,872 | 15 | #114 | 2,930 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #98 | 3,062 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | #89 | 3,408 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #79 | 3,909 |
| 1966 | #2,308 | 27 | #67 | 4,617 |
| 1965 | #3,952 | 11 | #55 | 5,685 |
| 1964 | #3,108 | 17 | #51 | 7,092 |
| 1963 | #2,252 | 28 | #49 | 8,050 |
| 1962 | #2,463 | 24 | #46 | 9,154 |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | #45 | 9,997 |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | #43 | 10,645 |
| 1959 | #2,191 | 27 | #41 | 11,068 |
| 1958 | #2,025 | 30 | #44 | 10,079 |
| 1957 | #1,842 | 35 | #44 | 8,910 |
| 1956 | #2,194 | 25 | #59 | 6,472 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #72 | 5,509 |
| 1954 | #2,695 | 17 | #76 | 5,062 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #84 | 4,539 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #85 | 4,313 |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #86 | 4,053 |
| 1950 | #2,781 | 14 | #83 | 4,207 |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 | #68 | 5,027 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #60 | 5,742 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 | #58 | 6,231 |
| 1946 | #3,665 | 8 | #69 | 4,570 |
| 1945 | #2,916 | 10 | #79 | 3,384 |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 | #89 | 2,836 |
| 1943 | #2,861 | 11 | #93 | 2,684 |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | #102 | 2,376 |
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | #112 | 1,881 |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | #121 | 1,555 |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #139 | 1,208 |
| 1938 | — | #149 | 1,077 | |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #172 | 846 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #178 | 741 |
| 1935 | — | #176 | 773 | |
| 1934 | — | #176 | 771 | |
| 1933 | — | #178 | 728 | |
| 1932 | — | #177 | 780 | |
| 1931 | #3,226 | 8 | #173 | 786 |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #169 | 862 |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 | #162 | 887 |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | #162 | 925 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 | #154 | 1,027 |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | #151 | 1,052 |
| 1925 | #4,028 | 7 | #144 | 1,145 |
| 1924 | #3,665 | 8 | #139 | 1,219 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | #133 | 1,255 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #130 | 1,269 |
| 1921 | #4,464 | 6 | #130 | 1,294 |
| 1920 | — | #127 | 1,281 | |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #125 | 1,294 |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #109 | 1,523 |
| 1917 | #2,693 | 11 | #112 | 1,385 |
| 1916 | — | #108 | 1,399 | |
| 1915 | — | #110 | 1,335 | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #112 | 998 |
| 1913 | — | #121 | 661 | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #123 | 543 |
| 1911 | — | #133 | 255 | |
| 1910 | — | #135 | 245 | |
| 1909 | — | #140 | 187 | |
| 1908 | — | #161 | 149 | |
| 1907 | — | #147 | 157 | |
| 1906 | — | #153 | 131 | |
| 1905 | — | #160 | 126 | |
| 1904 | — | #156 | 123 | |
| 1903 | — | #147 | 127 | |
| 1902 | — | #181 | 92 | |
| 1901 | — | #192 | 76 | |
| 1900 | — | #150 | 139 | |
| 1899 | — | #180 | 78 | |
| 1898 | — | #179 | 87 | |
| 1897 | — | #192 | 79 | |
| 1896 | — | #171 | 94 | |
| 1895 | — | #203 | 71 | |
| 1894 | — | #184 | 80 | |
| 1893 | — | #197 | 73 | |
| 1892 | — | #213 | 68 | |
| 1891 | — | #211 | 56 | |
| 1890 | — | #201 | 66 | |
| 1889 | — | #203 | 64 | |
| 1888 | — | #177 | 83 | |
| 1887 | — | #210 | 54 | |
| 1886 | — | #192 | 70 | |
| 1885 | — | #204 | 60 | |
| 1884 | — | #202 | 66 | |
| 1883 | — | #190 | 62 | |
| 1882 | — | #203 | 63 | |
| 1881 | — | #229 | 44 | |
| 1880 | — | #225 | 52 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Steve was already there! It came in at #225, and was given to 52 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 67 boys a year got the name.
Where Steve is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Pennsylvania#37 · 1 in 190
- Ohio#42 · 1 in 193
- Arizona#69 · 1 in 271
- Illinois#70 · 1 in 350
- New Jersey#70 · 1 in 362
Best ever in a state: #19 in Idaho, 1947.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #37 | 386 | 1 in 190 |
| Ohio | #42 | 210 | 1 in 193 |
| Arizona | #69 | 9 | 1 in 271 |
| Illinois | #70 | 142 | 1 in 350 |
| New Jersey | #70 | 67 | 1 in 362 |
| Michigan | #73 | 77 | 1 in 358 |
| West Virginia | #81 | 29 | 1 in 386 |
| Connecticut | #85 | 22 | 1 in 523 |
| Indiana | #88 | 44 | 1 in 463 |
| Wisconsin | #107 | 35 | 1 in 573 |
| Montana | #109 | 9 | 1 in 527 |
| Minnesota | #111 | 31 | 1 in 607 |
| New Mexico | #129 | 5 | 1 in 544 |
| New York | #138 | 70 | 1 in 1,147 |
| North Dakota | #151 | 8 | 1 in 835 |
| Kentucky | #152 | 20 | 1 in 985 |
| Colorado | #156 | 7 | 1 in 886 |
| Mississippi | #158 | 18 | 1 in 900 |
| California | #169 | 16 | 1 in 1,122 |
| South Dakota | #171 | 5 | 1 in 1,021 |
| Massachusetts | #178 | 14 | 1 in 2,076 |
| Nebraska | #195 | 8 | 1 in 1,300 |
| Texas | #202 | 36 | 1 in 1,063 |
| Missouri | #239 | 13 | 1 in 1,893 |
| South Carolina | #247 | 9 | 1 in 1,862 |
| Louisiana | #248 | 10 | 1 in 1,483 |
| Arkansas | #262 | 8 | 1 in 1,712 |
| Alabama | #267 | 10 | 1 in 2,117 |
| Tennessee | #280 | 8 | 1 in 2,337 |
| Virginia | #288 | 7 | 1 in 2,636 |
| Oklahoma | #302 | 7 | 1 in 2,222 |
| Georgia | #352 | 8 | 1 in 3,265 |
| North Carolina | #371 | 7 | 1 in 3,592 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Steve
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 76 spots since 2024 (#1,685 → #1,609)
- 359 spots since 2020 (#1,250 → #1,609)
- 670 spots since 2015 (#939 → #1,609)
- Biggest jump: 78 spots in 2011 (#785 → #707)
- Biggest drop: 174 spots in 2010 (#611 → #785)
Rise & fade · boys
79 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1959 at #41 (11,068 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 1943–1969
- Top 1,000: 137 yrs · run 1880–2016
Share of babies · boys
1 in 193
- Highest: 1 in 193 boys born in 1959 were named Steve (0.52%)
- Latest: 1 in 16,267 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1960s
- 27.2% of all boys named Steve (65,619) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 618 | #177 (1888) | #204 |
| 1890s | 752 | #171 (1896) | #193 |
| 1900s | 1,307 | #140 (1909) | #159 |
| 1910s | 9,638 | #108 (1916) | #119 |
| 1920s | 11,354 | #127 (1920) | #143 |
| 1930s | 8,572 | #139 (1939) | #169 |
| 1940s | 36,286 | #58 (1947) | #85 |
| 1950s | 64,212 | #41 (1959) | #67 |
| 1960s | 65,619 | #43 (1960) | #62 |
| 1970s | 16,652 | #114 (1970) | #162 |
| 1980s | 10,392 | #201 (1980) | #229 |
| 1990s | 7,654 | #267 (1990) | #339 |
| 2000s | 5,097 | #393 (2000) | #503 |
| 2010s | 2,348 | #707 (2011) | #932 |
| 2020s | 723 | #1,250 (2020) | #1,488 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Steve in 1916
boys
#108
1,399 births · 1 in 636 boys
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 636 of them was named Steve, which outranked 97.6% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Steve
Biggest movers since 1915
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.