Susie
#1,911 for girls in 2025, 101 births · Last seen for boys in 1964 at #4,039
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1883 · 436 births
- Debut · girls
- 361 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 28 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 85,789since 1880
Susie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,911 | 101 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,327 | 79 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,176 | 87 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,228 | 84 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,212 | 84 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,078 | 88 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,331 | 77 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,014 | 97 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,989 | 99 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,247 | 85 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,060 | 95 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,323 | 79 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,232 | 84 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,190 | 86 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,237 | 86 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,204 | 89 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,184 | 91 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,213 | 89 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,016 | 98 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,296 | 78 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,240 | 78 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,260 | 75 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,915 | 92 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,957 | 88 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,730 | 101 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,018 | 77 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,646 | 98 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,656 | 95 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,375 | 122 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,542 | 99 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,408 | 114 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,426 | 113 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,329 | 126 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,122 | 158 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,088 | 162 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,067 | 158 | — | |
| 1988 | #930 | 182 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,009 | 154 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,029 | 147 | — | |
| 1985 | #948 | 164 | — | |
| 1984 | #875 | 173 | — | |
| 1983 | #918 | 162 | — | |
| 1982 | #834 | 188 | — | |
| 1981 | #700 | 240 | — | |
| 1980 | #740 | 224 | — | |
| 1979 | #703 | 241 | — | |
| 1978 | #679 | 235 | — | |
| 1977 | #666 | 237 | — | |
| 1976 | #635 | 243 | — | |
| 1975 | #577 | 287 | — | |
| 1974 | #542 | 311 | — | |
| 1973 | #533 | 315 | — | |
| 1972 | #488 | 364 | — | |
| 1971 | #493 | 388 | — | |
| 1970 | #532 | 355 | — | |
| 1969 | #466 | 431 | — | |
| 1968 | #443 | 462 | — | |
| 1967 | #395 | 529 | — | |
| 1966 | #371 | 598 | — | |
| 1965 | #373 | 599 | — | |
| 1964 | #317 | 870 | #4,039 | 5 |
| 1963 | #297 | 975 | — | |
| 1962 | #286 | 1,013 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #271 | 1,128 | #3,356 | 7 |
| 1960 | #255 | 1,205 | — | |
| 1959 | #240 | 1,277 | #2,821 | 9 |
| 1958 | #222 | 1,360 | — | |
| 1957 | #240 | 1,245 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #274 | 991 | — | |
| 1955 | #288 | 907 | — | |
| 1954 | #278 | 930 | — | |
| 1953 | #280 | 885 | — | |
| 1952 | #274 | 873 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #261 | 885 | — | |
| 1950 | #243 | 943 | — | |
| 1949 | #236 | 996 | — | |
| 1948 | #235 | 1,019 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #227 | 1,071 | — | |
| 1946 | #217 | 1,078 | — | |
| 1945 | #214 | 893 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | #213 | 930 | — | |
| 1943 | #218 | 906 | — | |
| 1942 | #231 | 834 | — | |
| 1941 | #231 | 743 | #2,207 | 11 |
| 1940 | #230 | 738 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #225 | 745 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #215 | 790 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #210 | 794 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #223 | 732 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #224 | 767 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #230 | 755 | — | |
| 1933 | #225 | 743 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #217 | 804 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #209 | 868 | #2,328 | 11 |
| 1930 | #205 | 922 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #202 | 926 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #194 | 1,051 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | #184 | 1,112 | — | |
| 1926 | #184 | 1,153 | #2,904 | 9 |
| 1925 | #172 | 1,311 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #176 | 1,275 | #3,260 | 8 |
| 1923 | #170 | 1,332 | #2,614 | 11 |
| 1922 | #172 | 1,303 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #168 | 1,321 | #4,322 | 5 |
| 1920 | #163 | 1,395 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #151 | 1,476 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #159 | 1,388 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #159 | 1,329 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #155 | 1,313 | — | |
| 1915 | #149 | 1,270 | #2,829 | 8 |
| 1914 | #130 | 1,165 | — | |
| 1913 | #130 | 965 | — | |
| 1912 | #120 | 976 | — | |
| 1911 | #111 | 822 | — | |
| 1910 | #102 | 858 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #101 | 770 | #1,277 | 6 |
| 1908 | #104 | 698 | #1,021 | 8 |
| 1907 | #97 | 756 | — | |
| 1906 | #98 | 693 | — | |
| 1905 | #93 | 739 | — | |
| 1904 | #95 | 662 | — | |
| 1903 | #90 | 680 | #1,009 | 6 |
| 1902 | #87 | 717 | — | |
| 1901 | #88 | 650 | — | |
| 1900 | #80 | 947 | #1,162 | 6 |
| 1899 | #86 | 622 | — | |
| 1898 | #85 | 702 | — | |
| 1897 | #85 | 626 | #942 | 6 |
| 1896 | #79 | 718 | — | |
| 1895 | #83 | 674 | #872 | 7 |
| 1894 | #78 | 679 | — | |
| 1893 | #78 | 644 | — | |
| 1892 | #75 | 669 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #76 | 566 | — | |
| 1890 | #73 | 630 | — | |
| 1889 | #71 | 607 | — | |
| 1888 | #71 | 621 | — | |
| 1887 | #75 | 485 | — | |
| 1886 | #69 | 559 | — | |
| 1885 | #72 | 477 | — | |
| 1884 | #73 | 455 | — | |
| 1883 | #67 | 436 | — | |
| 1882 | #70 | 412 | — | |
| 1881 | #68 | 367 | — | |
| 1880 | #69 | 361 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Susie was already there! It came in at #69, and was given to 361 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1997–2025, when fewer than 110 girls a year got the name.
Where Susie is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Georgia#50 · 1 in 170
- Mississippi#56 · 1 in 214
- Alabama#60 · 1 in 210
- Florida#68 · 1 in 223
- Virginia#79 · 1 in 303
Best ever in a state: #27 in Georgia, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #50 | 184 | 1 in 170 |
| Mississippi | #56 | 84 | 1 in 214 |
| Alabama | #60 | 123 | 1 in 210 |
| Florida | #68 | 39 | 1 in 223 |
| Virginia | #79 | 80 | 1 in 303 |
| South Carolina | #83 | 65 | 1 in 296 |
| New Mexico | #94 | 10 | 1 in 300 |
| Tennessee | #95 | 61 | 1 in 379 |
| Arkansas | #100 | 46 | 1 in 356 |
| Kentucky | #111 | 52 | 1 in 463 |
| Louisiana | #114 | 40 | 1 in 443 |
| Texas | #114 | 93 | 1 in 484 |
| North Carolina | #119 | 62 | 1 in 492 |
| Oklahoma | #131 | 36 | 1 in 509 |
| Connecticut | #138 | 18 | 1 in 726 |
| Arizona | #141 | 5 | 1 in 473 |
| Colorado | #144 | 10 | 1 in 679 |
| Maryland | #149 | 14 | 1 in 860 |
| West Virginia | #164 | 19 | 1 in 799 |
| New Jersey | #180 | 22 | 1 in 1,305 |
| Missouri | #207 | 22 | 1 in 1,311 |
| Pennsylvania | #220 | 39 | 1 in 2,289 |
| North Dakota | #225 | 5 | 1 in 1,500 |
| New York | #232 | 46 | 1 in 2,043 |
| Nebraska | #237 | 7 | 1 in 1,609 |
| Illinois | #241 | 27 | 1 in 2,145 |
| Kansas | #242 | 9 | 1 in 1,644 |
| Indiana | #243 | 12 | 1 in 1,976 |
| Ohio | #272 | 17 | 1 in 2,822 |
| California | #278 | 9 | 1 in 2,173 |
| Iowa | #300 | 8 | 1 in 2,587 |
| Michigan | #351 | 8 | 1 in 4,034 |
| Wisconsin | #383 | 5 | 1 in 4,705 |
| Massachusetts | #399 | 5 | 1 in 6,654 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Susie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 416 spots since 2024 (#2,327 → #1,911)
- 167 spots since 2020 (#2,078 → #1,911)
- 149 spots since 2015 (#2,060 → #1,911)
- Biggest jump: 79 spots in 1988 (#1,009 → #930)
- Biggest drop: 137 spots in 1989 (#930 → #1,067)
Rise & fade · girls
3 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #67 (436 births)
- Births halved by 1982, 99 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 28 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1880–1907
- Top 1,000: 107 yrs · run 1880–1985
Share of babies · girls
1 in 251
- Highest: 1 in 251 girls born in 1881 were named Susie (0.40%)
- Latest: 1 in 15,914 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #67 in 1883, was only 1 in 258 (0.39%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 14.2% of all girls named Susie (12,179) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 4,780 | #67 (1883) | #71 |
| 1890s | 6,530 | #73 (1890) | #80 |
| 1900s | 7,312 | #80 (1900) | #93 |
| 1910s | 11,562 | #102 (1910) | #137 |
| 1920s | 12,179 | #163 (1920) | #179 |
| 1930s | 7,920 | #205 (1930) | #218 |
| 1940s | 9,208 | #213 (1944) | #225 |
| 1950s | 10,296 | #222 (1958) | #260 |
| 1960s | 7,810 | #255 (1960) | #347 |
| 1970s | 2,976 | #488 (1972) | #585 |
| 1980s | 1,792 | #700 (1981) | #905 |
| 1990s | 1,164 | #1,088 (1990) | #1,461 |
| 2000s | 879 | #1,730 (2000) | #2,102 |
| 2010s | 858 | #1,989 (2017) | #2,216 |
| 2020s | 523 | #1,911 (2025) | #2,155 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Susie in 1916
girls
#155
1,313 births · 1 in 795 girls
Top girls' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 795 of them was named Susie, which outranked 97.0% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).