Suzanne
#2,387 for girls in 2025, 75 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1946 · 5,948 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 219,309since 1880
Suzanne over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,387 | 75 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,533 | 70 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,674 | 65 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,995 | 55 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,037 | 54 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,498 | 43 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,130 | 51 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,004 | 54 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,432 | 74 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,617 | 67 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,351 | 78 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,371 | 77 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,032 | 95 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,189 | 86 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,614 | 68 | — | |
| 2010 | #2,202 | 88 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,375 | 81 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,854 | 115 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,770 | 121 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,691 | 124 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,645 | 121 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,436 | 143 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,267 | 165 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,165 | 176 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,050 | 204 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,019 | 207 | — | |
| 1999 | #948 | 219 | — | |
| 1998 | #835 | 255 | — | |
| 1997 | #773 | 271 | — | |
| 1996 | #667 | 333 | — | |
| 1995 | #631 | 345 | — | |
| 1994 | #560 | 424 | — | |
| 1993 | #521 | 469 | — | |
| 1992 | #442 | 570 | — | |
| 1991 | #396 | 646 | — | |
| 1990 | #370 | 716 | — | |
| 1989 | #309 | 836 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #279 | 891 | — | |
| 1987 | #266 | 948 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #255 | 1,009 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #235 | 1,099 | — | |
| 1984 | #205 | 1,293 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | #189 | 1,403 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #174 | 1,626 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #161 | 1,776 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #139 | 2,103 | #3,838 | 10 |
| 1979 | #127 | 2,245 | #4,068 | 9 |
| 1978 | #117 | 2,507 | #3,215 | 12 |
| 1977 | #121 | 2,373 | #3,203 | 12 |
| 1976 | #126 | 2,200 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #121 | 2,319 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #111 | 2,697 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #98 | 3,036 | #2,857 | 12 |
| 1972 | #92 | 3,300 | #2,819 | 12 |
| 1971 | #88 | 3,932 | #2,464 | 15 |
| 1970 | #87 | 4,425 | #3,282 | 9 |
| 1969 | #75 | 4,902 | #2,415 | 13 |
| 1968 | #69 | 5,040 | #1,962 | 17 |
| 1967 | #63 | 5,489 | #1,974 | 16 |
| 1966 | #62 | 5,684 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #65 | 5,912 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1964 | #67 | 6,485 | #2,546 | 11 |
| 1963 | #65 | 6,821 | #2,414 | 12 |
| 1962 | #65 | 6,851 | #2,035 | 16 |
| 1961 | #68 | 6,611 | #2,148 | 15 |
| 1960 | #78 | 5,966 | #2,871 | 9 |
| 1959 | #96 | 5,161 | #2,530 | 11 |
| 1958 | #104 | 4,637 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #102 | 4,660 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #94 | 5,024 | #2,628 | 10 |
| 1955 | #86 | 5,137 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #82 | 5,236 | #2,592 | 10 |
| 1953 | #78 | 5,472 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #84 | 4,909 | #2,514 | 10 |
| 1951 | #83 | 4,828 | #3,364 | 6 |
| 1950 | #71 | 5,266 | #2,321 | 11 |
| 1949 | #62 | 5,609 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #66 | 5,448 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #53 | 6,231 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #52 | 5,948 | #2,403 | 10 |
| 1945 | #68 | 3,770 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #78 | 3,462 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #86 | 3,280 | #1,764 | 17 |
| 1942 | #103 | 2,708 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #97 | 2,611 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #109 | 2,338 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #122 | 2,031 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #133 | 1,807 | #2,479 | 9 |
| 1937 | #145 | 1,546 | — | |
| 1936 | #151 | 1,350 | — | |
| 1935 | #154 | 1,310 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #153 | 1,340 | — | |
| 1933 | #181 | 950 | — | |
| 1932 | #215 | 828 | — | |
| 1931 | #214 | 805 | — | |
| 1930 | #217 | 793 | — | |
| 1929 | #259 | 603 | — | |
| 1928 | #267 | 583 | — | |
| 1927 | #296 | 509 | — | |
| 1926 | #294 | 522 | — | |
| 1925 | #327 | 414 | — | |
| 1924 | #335 | 405 | — | |
| 1923 | #349 | 359 | — | |
| 1922 | #362 | 334 | — | |
| 1921 | #338 | 376 | — | |
| 1920 | #388 | 285 | — | |
| 1919 | #472 | 199 | — | |
| 1918 | #434 | 234 | — | |
| 1917 | #465 | 194 | — | |
| 1916 | #502 | 167 | — | |
| 1915 | #474 | 169 | — | |
| 1914 | #483 | 131 | — | |
| 1913 | #512 | 98 | — | |
| 1912 | #531 | 84 | — | |
| 1911 | #519 | 64 | — | |
| 1910 | #536 | 58 | — | |
| 1909 | #500 | 56 | — | |
| 1908 | #602 | 39 | — | |
| 1907 | #726 | 27 | — | |
| 1906 | #818 | 20 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #653 | 28 | — | |
| 1903 | #712 | 22 | — | |
| 1902 | #642 | 27 | — | |
| 1901 | #771 | 18 | — | |
| 1900 | #970 | 15 | — | |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | — | |
| 1898 | #840 | 16 | — | |
| 1897 | #931 | 12 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,122 | 9 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | #812 | 14 | — | |
| 1893 | #955 | 10 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,099 | 7 | — | |
| 1889 | #802 | 11 | — | |
| 1888 | #837 | 10 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 | — | |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 | — | |
| 1885 | #1,047 | 5 | — | |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | — | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | — | |
| 1881 | #740 | 6 | — | |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Suzanne was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1885, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Suzanne is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Pennsylvania#274 · 1 in 3,306
- Michigan#293 · 1 in 2,934
- Minnesota#318 · 1 in 2,706
- New York#333 · 1 in 4,272
- Massachusetts#335 · 1 in 4,753
Best ever in a state: #18 in Rhode Island, 1947.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | #274 | 27 | 1 in 3,306 |
| Michigan | #293 | 11 | 1 in 2,934 |
| Minnesota | #318 | 8 | 1 in 2,706 |
| New York | #333 | 22 | 1 in 4,272 |
| Massachusetts | #335 | 7 | 1 in 4,753 |
| New Jersey | #343 | 5 | 1 in 5,741 |
| Iowa | #387 | 5 | 1 in 4,139 |
| Ohio | #393 | 9 | 1 in 5,331 |
| Indiana | #397 | 5 | 1 in 4,742 |
| Illinois | #400 | 11 | 1 in 5,266 |
| Texas | #839 | 5 | 1 in 9,009 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Suzanne
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 146 spots since 2024 (#2,533 → #2,387)
- 1,111 spots since 2020 (#3,498 → #2,387)
- 36 spots since 2015 (#2,351 → #2,387)
- Biggest jump: 216 spots in 1893 (#1,171 → #955)
- Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1895 (#812 → #1,123)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1946 at #52 (5,948 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 28 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 30 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1959–1973
- Top 1,000: 112 yrs · run 1897–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 264
- Highest: 1 in 264 girls born in 1946 were named Suzanne (0.38%)
- Latest: 1 in 21,430 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 27.2% of all girls named Suzanne (59,761) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 70 | #530 (1882) | #833 |
| 1890s | 104 | #812 (1894) | #1,022 |
| 1900s | 268 | #500 (1909) | #732 |
| 1910s | 1,398 | #434 (1918) | #493 |
| 1920s | 4,390 | #259 (1929) | #322 |
| 1930s | 12,760 | #122 (1939) | #169 |
| 1940s | 41,405 | #52 (1946) | #77 |
| 1950s | 50,330 | #71 (1950) | #88 |
| 1960s | 59,761 | #62 (1966) | #68 |
| 1970s | 29,034 | #87 (1970) | #109 |
| 1980s | 12,984 | #139 (1980) | #221 |
| 1990s | 4,248 | #370 (1990) | #614 |
| 2000s | 1,457 | #1,019 (2000) | #1,527 |
| 2010s | 738 | #2,032 (2013) | #2,494 |
| 2020s | 362 | #2,387 (2025) | #2,854 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Suzanne in 1916
girls
#502
167 births · 1 in 6,253 girls
Top girls' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 6,253 of them was named Suzanne, which outranked 90.3% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).